Categories Science
The hearings are meant as a questioning of the scientific process
— Ashish K. Jha, MD, MPH (@ashishkjha) December 7, 2020
To sew doubt on what we know and how we know it
So a group of us organized a response, which we just posted on our website
It isn't pro or anti hydroxy
Its about the scientific method and why it matters
2/3
The goal of science is to acquire knowledge. The goal of medicine is to help the sick. That's a fundamental distinction.
Also, scientists stand apart from their subject matter--as distantly as possible. Physicians, on the contrary, are in "a relationship" with patients. 2/
Of course, medical care should rely on scientific knowledge, but that means that science should be at the service of the patient-physician relationship, not the other way around! /3
Also, scientific knowledge can never be the ultimate arbiter of medical decisions.
First, scientific knowledge is often limited or provisional, especially with a new disease.
Second, for every patient there are myriad circumstances that influence a medical decision. /3
Third, even if excellent scientific knowledge is present, the physician must always judge how it applies to the patient, or whether it applies at all.
Fourth--and most pertinent here--one cannot narrowly limit the scientific knowledge to only RCTs as you do in your statement. /4
For me, an incredible group of young scholars doing highly relevant science was the #Bestof2020. Here are my favorite 2020 paper by each of several young scholars with whom I get to work
To see where some of these folks were last year see this thread
let's start this #BestOfResp2020 with @UM_IHPI
It's time for #BestOf2019 lists
— Jack Iwashyna (@iwashyna) December 26, 2019
I thought I would try something new. Here are my single favorite paper by each of several young scholars with whom I get to work. They are all rock-stars. In lots of cases these were hard choices 'cause they were very productive this year...
.@msjoding changed the way I look at pulse oximetry in @nejm, rethinking my bedside care
This paper has rightly gotten a lot of
1/ Our research letter on racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement, out today in NEJM https://t.co/6dLuNGosxp pic.twitter.com/XXsfWfc5dv
— Michael Sjoding (@msjoding) December 17, 2020
But I think it is useful to look at it as an example of what makes Mike's work so interesting. A grant to build a dataset just to look at this project would, I think, have been un-fundable. Instead Mike had built an infrastructure to look at ARDS detection
When @msjoding came across Prof Amy Moran-Thomas's provocative @BostonReview essay (https://t.co/VB63h74o9U) he was able to pivot that data infrastructure to ask an important question...
Simple concept, go through each substantive chapter & log the topic of each paragraph in one line. I do this by hand on a legal pad, so the description has to be super brief. 1/
#SocAF #PhDChat #AcademicChatter
Reverse outlined my book manuscript today...highly recommend doing this for any manuscript. It allows you to see things you might not see otherwise and really consider the organization. #SocAF #AcademicChatter #PhDChat
— Brittany P. Battle, PhD (@Dr_B_Pearl) November 1, 2020
As I go, I write out the subheadings within the chapter with the title & a brief description of the content there (few words). I also note how many paragraphs of "set-up" are at the start of each chapter. 2/
For each paragraph, if it contains empirical data, I make a note of the case/example/quote..still only on a single line. This is indented under the paragraph topic line. For these lines, I wrote 'data' in the margin to flag where empirical data were included. 3/
I use post-it strips to flag things that I think of as I go...cite X or include Y example here or this needs to be fleshed out. 4/
Initially, this outline allows me to see where I'm light on data, when the set-up of sections isn't parallel (e.g. 3 paragraphs for one chapter and 5 for another), where I can include better examples, where my paragraphs are redundant or don't flow well one to the next. 5/
Graduate students of the Department of Ecology participate in wildlife scientific investigations, field behavior experiments, and genetic sample collection
https://t.co/Gdp74Onoel
Archived:
https://t.co/ursD2GvzcX
2. The latest research of the Department of Ecology
https://t.co/a7M0zwH9YE
Archived:
https://t.co/s1dZlpHu6A
3. Survey of bat field surgery in 2020:
from Guangdong to Yunnan
https://t.co/om0IG3HOBY
Archived:
https://t.co/7HKK59NYq2
4. Wuhan University Bat Research
Jiao Hengwu, a postdoctoral fellow in Dept of Ecology
https://t.co/pC0Oo2u2ta
Archived: Not Yet as a Chinese VPN is needed to access these pages and if a Chinese IP is used, https://t.co/mA4co7ioje is not accessible.
I shit on the great fearwall!
5. Ecologists of Wuhan University publish article in Science, calling for a comprehensive understanding of bats - Huabin Zhao (to be investigated)
https://t.co/hLrOVzMiga
Archived:
https://t.co/CQhmXRn5ia
Publication:
https://t.co/dEN8tc2NET
Search "Huabin Zhao live bat Wuhan"
In an earlier thread here: https://t.co/wfr5uu6s23 I discussed how Deleuze got rid of the concept of species in Aristotle's system by using the category of the individual singularity to encompass all actual ontological entities.
When it comes to heritage within the western tradition the way I assess it is not correctness but based on how interesting, remarkable and important the thinker is. This is important because whilst I embrace the entire western philosophical tradition as all having important
— Marcus Cunningham (@MarcusC31391111) November 17, 2020
But here we'll look at difference and repetition to take a stab at the broader category of genera.
From Somers-Hall's Book on Difference and Repetition.
"Second, Deleuze argues that while Aristotle provides an account of the determination of objects, he cannot provide an account of the constitution of objects. As we saw, properties are understood as properties of something, and the same could be said of differences.
https://t.co/zXuFN66SWe
Up until now, certification data for aircraft engine particle emissions have been reported in terms of a "smoke number", which is derived from the change in reflectance of a Whatman 4 filter after collecting 16.2 kg/m² exhaust. 2/
https://t.co/6fa9Kkdupr
One challenge with the smoke number measurement is that the filter doesn't capture all of the particles -- especially small ones. Is the decrease in smoke number over time because we are trading a few large soot particles for many more smaller soot particles? 3/
While smoke numbers are not particularly helpful for quantitatively assessing particle emissions impacts on air quality & upper tropospheric composition, they have been a huge success in motivating the reduction of unsightly exhaust plumes! 4/
Photo credit: flickr/dsleeter_2000
The new EI data are much more useful for #AirQuality and #Climate modeling efforts seeking to understand the environmental impacts of aviation. Since they're collected at ground conditions, the data are most relevant to AQ, but maybe can be extrapolated to cruise conditions? 5/
Falling bacterial communities from the atmosphere | Environmental Microbiome | Full Text https://t.co/sXCeAJ7Ba7
— Laurence Badgley (@BadgleyLaurence) December 11, 2020
Korean scientists quantify lift off, descent, & propagation of various bacteria “species” in the atmosphere & as high as 1,000 meters. These micro-spaceships average about 8 micrometers (if I got that right).
Atmospheric density of bacteria particles relates, in part, to their ability to nucleate with other airborne particles. Scientists can even differentiate the aerodynamic properties of these bacteria from larger (factor of 10x) pollen spores & larger fungal spores (factor of 5x).
Most surprisingly, these bacterial-driven spaceships can live & propagate while in the atmosphere via nutrient atmospheric milieus & sources of alcohols & other organic substrates.
In the mid-1980’s, Princess Stephanie (sister of Prince Rainier of Monaco) invited me to present at an intimate “Energy Medicine” symposium in that small kingdom. I remember it was their national holiday of fireworks & celebration.
Did you know that extreme abrupt climate change heat waves are projected to impact more than 3.5 billion people by the end of the 2040s including some which will be unsurvivable without air conditioning or do you get your news from the front pages of profit-maximising newspapers?
— Ben See (@ClimateBen) December 5, 2020
I'll add 4 sources here. The most important one is the video abstract of a paper by @EdwardByers , part 2/2. Because only this source shows how important global solidarity today is in alleviating poverty so as to lower the vulnerability in climate
"Global exposure and vulnerability to multi-sector development and climate change hotspots" https://t.co/zEyCX8SFug
— anlomedad (@anlomedad) August 21, 2020
Clip 2/2 of the paper's abstract as video. (Great #scicomm!)
It explains risks and people's vulnerability at 1.5C, 2C and 3C in world regions by 2050. pic.twitter.com/X55YB0hfwu
Or check out IPCC SR15 table 3.4. The figures in millions of people exposed or exposed and vulnerable are for the year 2050 on the respective warming pathways toward 2100. So in all likelihood we're already in for the 2˚ columns.
We can lower the impact only in global solidarity
condensed the figures into 3 stills for their primer on climate impacts, "The hard truths of climate change — by the numbers" https://t.co/qTqBVheHIl
But it doesn't show how global solidarity and alleviating poverty from today onwards can significantly lower vulnerability
Here's an interactive map to explore climate risks and hotspots: https://t.co/mbNk6m21lW
IMO, this info should be on newspapers' frontpage everyday as a constant warning where we're headed if we continue to hope for incremental efficiency improvements to our current system setup
Climate change will affect HUNDREDS of millions with impacts like floods, heatwaves, and drought - these places at risk are aka #HOTSPOTS \U0001f525
— Edwards Byers (@EdwardByers) October 27, 2020
\u2b07\ufe0f\U0001f9f5 on our new Global Hotspots Explorer \U0001f4e2https://t.co/tuPmqzLeIN
Partnership: @IIASAVienna @theGEF @UNIDO pic.twitter.com/LSCREyuok2
We worked with investigative partners @CNN (https://t.co/OqHbuglzDQ), @the_ins_ru (https://t.co/LIknsacbkH), and @derspiegel on this investigation. More to come!
Let's meet the crew!
Stanislav Makshakov, who coordinated the whole operation. He reports to General Kirill Vasilyev, director of the FSB Criminalistics Institute.
Oleg Tayakin, cover name Oleg “Tarasov”. A senior member of the FSB squad, typically coordinating other officers and operating primarily out of the central office at Akademika Vargi 2a. He worked as a surgeon before joining the FSB’s Criminalistics Institute.
Alexey Alexandrov, cover name “Alexey Frolov”. Graduated medical school in Moscow in 2006, worked as an emergency & military doctor doctor before joining the FSB in 2013. He was present at both 2020 poisonings, one suspected by Navalny + wife in Kaliningrad and the other in Tomsk