Mollyycolllinss Categories For later read
I cannot explain it, but it seems like the concept of "separation of powers" has become deeply alien and upsetting to most people. *Nothing* can be independent. And so we keep blurring the powers, and it causes systemic dysfunction. There's no long-term view.
— Kerry (@kerry62189) December 24, 2020
Naturally, this tends to lessen the public's respect for the whole system. It doesn't sound very attractive, or at least sounds like a particularly inefficient way of guarding against radical change. "They wanted to force compromise," is better, but also backfires.
It confuses the public into being mad that everyone "can't just get a long and compromise," like it's a matter of personal attitudes and conflict is a sign something is wrong. A more invigorating and accurate framing:

We've basically inverted this framing into something very demoralizing. "Congress isn't supposed to do anything," rather than "Congress is gunning for a showdown." And we're so confused that one of the impeachment charges against Trump was "Obstruction of Congress."

The point is that the branches were supposed to be actively tactical, and were given a set of tools to use against each other. Not "do nothing."

Instead of gathering dusts in my bookmarks I have compiled them into one guide:
With: @gaganbiyani @RomeenSheth @josephflaherty @yoheinakajima @daytonmills @micahjay1 @paigefinnn @dunkhippo33 @amanda_robs @pinverrr
1/10. Adjusting your mental mode to the process of
At Udemy, we were 3 first-time entrepreneurs trying to raise seed capital. We made every mistake in the book.
— Gagan Biyani (@gaganbiyani) October 7, 2020
We got 200+ no\u2019s and wasted 12 months fundraising.
We eventually pulled through, just barely. \U0001f605
This thread shares our mistakes as lessons for founders.
**Read On**
2/10. Fundamentals for building the slide
0/ There\u2019s a lot of noise on how to pitch your startup.
— Romeen Sheth (@RomeenSheth) January 5, 2021
Keep it simple. Every good pitch boils down to five ingredients. If you have all 5, you'll get funded. Miss 1 and it can be fatal.
I made a chart describing how the ingredients relate to each other.
Let's dig in \U0001f447 pic.twitter.com/pSeH8yzfKp
3/10. How to craft the most important slide in the
Every pitch deck needs a \u201cteam\u201d slide.
— Joseph Flaherty (@josephflaherty) January 31, 2020
At the early stage of a startup when the product concept is fuzzy and revenue is non-existent, VCs are essentially backing the team above all else.
But almost all team slides are sub-optimal.
Here are two ways they could be better:
/1
4/10. One way of raising a seed round:
How to raise a seed round. Just one process, adjust accordingly. Missing lots of nuance. \U0001f447
— Yohei Nakajima \U0001f64b\U0001f3fb\u200d\u2642\ufe0f (@yoheinakajima) December 20, 2020
he's sure that if he hadn't had the help he does from the very beginning, he'd have lost a long time ago.
"It's not up to me." (It's up to you.)
— cas \U0001f338 (@dekuthepastry) January 19, 2021
shouto steps out of his office. he's the last to leave tonight, though that's no surprise. he's usually one of the lastest working heroes in the agency.
he'd been hoping to get back to his apartment without a hitch, but he can tell that won't be the case. not tonight.
not when it feels like someone's watching his every move.
he continues walking for a beat, stepping out of view of his agency. he reaches a fire escape stairwell against the side of another building and climbs to the top, quiet as he can.
shouto could use his ice to get up,
but keeping inconspicuous is more important than speed.
he settles on the edge of the building, legs relishing in the pull of gravity for but a moment.
"shadow," shouto says aloud then, unsurprised.
when he blinks, the vigilante stands beside him, usual dark get-up donned, though this time he doesn't have his mask and hood pulled up. he looks... normal. if anything, that feels stranger than seeing nothing but the man's green eyes.
We are exclusively focused on the *supply chain*. We neglect the *demand* for this content.
The truth is that people searched for an excuse, or opening, to be radicalized.
Keep in mind: Hitler launched the campaign of lies and evil that brought the Holocaust in an age when the Internet was yet to be even dreamed of.
— Brent Staples (@BrentNYT) January 11, 2021
I find the comparison to drugs and addiction helpful here, and it is one that I do carefully.
100 people to to the doctor and get an opioid after a procedure. About 95 will never use again.
A lot of us are exposed to extremist content. Most of us don’t get radicalized.
So while the supply and exposure played a role in both addiction and radicalization, it is not magic. It doesn’t just take over people. It taps into demand.
So maybe the question is less about how they got the supply and more why they find it so appealing.
That’s tougher.
It is much easier to imagine an immediate policy solution to Trump’s twitter account or YouTube’s auto play than to the coercive impact of 401 years of America apartheid and racist myth making.
But again drugs suggest that those quick supply cuts don’t work.
A century of drug busts made the problem worse. This observation led to the iron law of prohibition: the harder the enforcement, the harder the drugs.
When you cut supply, people who want drugs *will* find drugs — and often more dangerous drugs.
This is where my insight ends.
6. What about the exception for \u201ccases of impeachment\u201d?
— Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) January 19, 2021
Some argue that this means that no pardons can be issued *while* the President is under impeachment or for offenses by others that are *related* to the basis for an impeachment.
I (and most scholars) strongly disagree.
Is it only limited when the president is impeached and removed? Clinton’s pardons were allowed to stand, after he was impeached by the House—but the impeachment cause was so trivial—& they were also unrelated to the causes of his impeachment.
I actually think that allowing Clinton to grant pardons after impeachment was a big mistake, one that went against the intention of the Constitution, & one that helped to create the current mess. But that narrow precedent stands. What about the longer history & larger question?
After impeachment, President Johnson gave at least two pardons but they were reversed by President Grant immediately afterwards. How many did he give once impeached? Can other historians pipe in?
The revised edition of Joseph Story’s textbook of constitutional interpretation, published in 1868, said that presidents cannot pardon after impeachment as such a power “might become ... a protection against political offenses...the party accused might be acting under ...”


Such “pseudo-cuneiform” text is known from some seals and charms, like these Lamaštu amulets (https://t.co/JBcbmybEmH & https://t.co/fByNIVOzF5). Presumably the intended viewers couldn't read cuneiform, so it didn't matter if the signs were nonsense. They still looked impressive!

Of course, such “pseudo-writing” is not restricted to cuneiform, but is found all over the world and for all writing systems. For a nice overview, see e.g. Houston 2018, “Writing that Isn’t: Pseudo-Scripts in Comparative View”, https://t.co/G0at5siAxS

In fact, some authors have suggested that “pseudo-texts are relatively rare in cuneiform” (Veldhuis, via Houston 2018) — of course excluding modern fake antiquities, which we already mentioned in a previous thread a few days ago:
Fact 20: Cuneiform tablets have been forged for ages! Ancient forgeries are often more difficult to identify, while modern fakes can sometimes be pretty clumsy. Here\u2019s a short thread on cuneiform forgery. #AdventCalendar pic.twitter.com/zPKSfCmNLQ
— Team Cuneiform (@cooleiform) December 20, 2020
Certainly they seem to be a lot harder to find than I expected! The few images above are pretty much all we found while researching (a.k.a. googling) material for this thread. I'm sure more are known in the literature, but my usually decent web search skills are failing me here.
Popping back on briefly to share some insights on media consumption, spread of conspiracy theories, & epistemelogical divides.
— hannah anderson (@sometimesalight) January 12, 2021
1. The increased burden of sifting fact from fiction is one that only the economically privileged have the bandwidth to keep up with day-to-day, especially w/the SPEED of news generation we've seen in the last 6-10 years. This contributes to polarization & significantly... 2/12
... disadvantages blue collar America (on the left and the right) in an info economy, and is a massive catalyst for populist sentiments that make it exponentially harder for already-weak institutions to lead or swim against the tide (see Yuval Levin's "A Time to Build"). 3/12
2. I cannot agree more effusively with @sometimesalight's point re: social media & narrative. Social media platforms function as counterfeit institutions (social spaces that form identity via narrative, connection via shared purpose, & virtue via participation). 4/12
Prior to SocMed's ubiquity(approx. 2010), sifting/weighing primarily happened in traditional institutions (esp. churches) where perspectives tempered by wisdom, virtue, & relationship both evaluated & prioritized info. They served as both refuge & filter, solvent & catalyst. 5/12
This is very important for people in leadership positions. \u201cHey, have a second?\u201d can send someone with anxiety into a world of panic. Did I mess something up? Am
— Seth Vargo (@sethvargo) January 23, 2021
I getting fired? Is my manager quitting? Is the company going under? https://t.co/AFltjJ0NNe
Once, long ago, my manager came to me on a Friday afternoon: "Are you going to be here on Monday?" 2/
Now, this is the 1990s: to work from home, you needed a modem (!!) -- and at the time, I owned no computer so even that wasn't happening. So I was emphatically going to be there on Monday, if for no other reason that I had nowhere else to work. 3/
"Yes, of course I'm going to be here on Monday."
"Okay, we need to talk Monday."
"Is there something wrong? Can we talk now?"
"Let's talk Monday." 4/
My early-twentysomething self was (obviously?) very anxious, so I immediately went to the office of the senior engineer in the group (and my mentor), Jeff Bonwick to see if he knew of anything that I might have screwed up... 5/