Fact 23: Not all "cuneiform writing" actually meant something. Sometimes just imitating the general appearance of cuneiform-like signs could be enough — why bother to learn the whole complex writing system if others can't read it anyway?

Such “pseudo-cuneiform” text is known from some seals and charms, like these Lamaštu amulets (https://t.co/JBcbmybEmH & https://t.co/fByNIVOzF5). Presumably the intended viewers couldn't read cuneiform, so it didn't matter if the signs were nonsense. They still looked impressive!
Of course, such “pseudo-writing” is not restricted to cuneiform, but is found all over the world and for all writing systems. For a nice overview, see e.g. Houston 2018, “Writing that Isn’t: Pseudo-Scripts in Comparative View”, https://t.co/G0at5siAxS
In fact, some authors have suggested that “pseudo-texts are relatively rare in cuneiform” (Veldhuis, via Houston 2018) — of course excluding modern fake antiquities, which we already mentioned in a previous thread a few days ago: https://t.co/PCSBlc8gjK
Certainly they seem to be a lot harder to find than I expected! The few images above are pretty much all we found while researching (a.k.a. googling) material for this thread. I'm sure more are known in the literature, but my usually decent web search skills are failing me here.
So instead of sticking to my original topic, let me digress a bit. Because what I did find instead was sort of interesting too, if not quite what I was planning to make this thread about. 😃
At first I tried just searching for “pseudocuneiform” on Google, but the first result I got (after Wikipedia) was this patent for a “pseudo-cuneiform tactile display” for blind readers: https://t.co/yh2q3tV7Sk 😮 And the rest of the results weren’t much more relevant, either.
Another curious search result I got was this medal from 1987, featuring Nebuchadnezzar II and Saddam Hussein(!) and described by the @britishmuseum as having “pseudocuneiform inscriptions” on both sides: https://t.co/gtsoDbvbzu I think they're wrong, though!
The inscription on the reverse seems to be actual Old Babylonian cuneiform, with the Sumerian name of the city of Babylon, KA.DINGIR.RA{ki}, clearly readable on the right. Alas, the rest of the inscription (except for the sign AN on the lower left) is worn out and hard to read.
Luckily https://t.co/duCpvWzMe1 shows the top three signs to be ki-šár-ra, meaning "of the whole world" in Sumerian. What I'm unsure of is the sign before them that looks like U+AB. I'm 90% sure it's a real sign, since the rest of the text makes sense, but I don't recognize it.
In context, I'd rather like to read it as ezen = "festival", but it doesn't quite match any variant of that sign listed in Labat. Maybe it's a (modern) scribal error?
Also, can anyone here read the non-English text on the obverse? I think it might be stylized Arabic, but since none of us can actually read even normal Arabic… (I know, being able to read Akkadian but not Arabic seems kind of backwards. What can I say? It’s on my to do list.🙄)
Anyway, sorry for the random digression. Unless of course you find trying to decipher a modern cuneiform inscription from the 1980s as interesting as I do, in which case I'm not sorry at all. 😁 And if you know any good references for ancient pseudo-cuneiform text, let me know!

More from For later read

How I created content in 2020

A thread...

Back in Aug 2016, I started creating content to share my experiences as an entrepreneur.
Over 3 years I had put out 1,200+ hours of content - posting every week without


Little did I know that something I started almost 4 years back would give my life an entirely new direction.

At the end of 2019, my biggest platform was LinkedIn with ~700K followers.

In Jan 2020, I decided to build a team that would help me with the content.

I ran a month long recruitment drive to hire a team of interns.

It comprised 4 detailed rounds - starting with my loved 20 questions, then an assignment, then a WhatsApp video round and finally F2F.

Through 1,200+ applications, I finally selected 6 profiles, starting March.

I am a firm believer in @peterthiel's one task, one person philosophy
So the team was structured such that everyone was responsible for ONLY one task

1. Content ideas
2. Videography
3. Video editing
4. LinkedIn (+TikTok) distribution
5. FB+IG distribution
6. YouTube distribution

You May Also Like

https://t.co/6cRR2B3jBE
Viruses and other pathogens are often studied as stand-alone entities, despite that, in nature, they mostly live in multispecies associations called biofilms—both externally and within the host.

https://t.co/FBfXhUrH5d


Microorganisms in biofilms are enclosed by an extracellular matrix that confers protection and improves survival. Previous studies have shown that viruses can secondarily colonize preexisting biofilms, and viral biofilms have also been described.


...we raise the perspective that CoVs can persistently infect bats due to their association with biofilm structures. This phenomenon potentially provides an optimal environment for nonpathogenic & well-adapted viruses to interact with the host, as well as for viral recombination.


Biofilms can also enhance virion viability in extracellular environments, such as on fomites and in aquatic sediments, allowing viral persistence and dissemination.
I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.


Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel

He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:

He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:

He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party