ThomassRichards's Categories

ThomassRichards's Authors

Latest Saves

If anyone thinks this is a good faith proposal, designed to secure democratic consent for changes to public monuments, let's look at what Robert Jenrick said four months ago about the procedures he is about to impose. [THREAD]


2. In a speech last September, Jenrick complained that "the planning system is broken". Only "1% of people" had "the esoteric knowledge to navigate [its] arcane and protracted world", shutting out those "who don’t have the time to contribute to the lengthy and archaic process".

3. If campaigners make it through that process (which Jenrick himself calls "as inconsistent as it is slow") more barriers lie ahead. "I will not hesitate to use my powers as Secretary of State" to enforce the view, to "be set out in law", that statues should "almost always" stay

4. When this govt wants councils to do something - like building houses - it invariably overrides the planning system. When it wants to *stop* them doing something - like moving statues - it enforces it. This is not an attempt to democratise change. It's an attempt to obstruct it

5.If the goal were to prevent direct action against statues, blocking lawful & constitutional avenues for change would be a foolish way of doing it. As I wrote here, we need good faith mechanisms where the case for change can be argued & contested lawfully
Reporters, pundits, activists. Before you echo the notion that Palestinians are being "corralled into small, crowded enclaves", which is in vogue in some circles, here are some facts that you won't find in @btselem's new position paper. Read and decide for yourself.

Thread:


Starting with the West Bank, specifically Area C from which allegedly Palestinians are being systematically pushed into the enclaves of Areas A and B, and replaced by Jewish settlers. If so, we should've seen the demographic balance in Area C shift in the Jews' favor. Has it? /2

Well, there's no evidence for that, certainly none in the paper. Latest UN estimate is ~ 300k Palestinians in Area C in 2013, probably >3 times their number in 1995 when the area was delineated. Jewish population growth in the same area & period was slower or similar at 2.6%./3

While good population stats for Area C are unavailable, there are construction surveys based on aerial photos. Do they support Btselem's claim? Quite the contrary. At least one shows that in recent yrs the total Palestinian residential area expanded more than the Jewish one./4


The same analysis by @RegavimIsrael found that the number of Palestinian structures in Area C increased by 28,600 during 2009-2019, nearly doubling in one decade, far more than the 18,600 built in Jewish settlements in that period, according to official statistics. /5
So many of you have tweeted this excellent 🧵at me. Thank you.

Couple of things to clarify in case you don't know what these systems are

/1


Daniel mentions 2 different systems: EMCS used to register movements of excise goods (wine) and CHIEF for customs.

As excise products are subject to additional controls EMCS was used even when we were in the EU. And it still is now.

/2

CHIEF is different, it's a customs systems. Reminder, as an EU member we didn't have customs borders with other EU states.

We've now introduced a new customs border so all movements to/from the EU need to be logged in CHIEF AS WELL AS other relevant systems.

/3

CHIEF isn't easy to use. Kudos to Daniel for managing to input directly into it. The additional software helps but yes, there is a cost involved. Or you can pay the broker.

Part of that extra admin cost we've been warning about for the last 5 years

/4

Another issue is that CHIEF will soon (ish) be replaced by CDS. A new version. So even if you learn how to deal with CHIEF now you'll soon need to re-learn on CDS.

/5
@Ayjchan 1. Great idea & it is all for a good cause, isn't it?
I predicted this in April and was the first to catch them doing it on Dec 2.
https://t.co/PMcICHQWUi
So, make sure to credit me in any article you write!
Taiwan News reported it on basis of my tweet as @keverington can confirm


@keverington 2. Here you go, Alina, about


@keverington 3. My prediction from


@keverington 4. Supporting Links


@keverington 5. Holmes and
A THREAD OF PEOPLE DISCUSSING MY THREAD:

here's a good thought about it


and here's another good place to get started on it


this person is saying things about the thread


oh jeez did i forget to add part 5 hold on
Saw this paper on floating on the TL and decided to take a break from death by Rā„¢ļø

A lot to unpack...but we’re in the middle of a pancetta so I’m gonna leave most of it in the bag 🧵

https://t.co/XrV77u6rUp


I almost quit after the section on ā€œRacial Categorizations in the United Statesā€ b/c it oversimplifies & inaccurately recounts the history of census racial designations.

(No ā€œBlackā€ or ā€œNativeā€ in the 8/2/1790 census, btw. Indigenous ppl were first counted in the 1860 census)


Many weren’t ā€œwhiteā€ until coming to the US & many immigrated to access ā€œwhitenessā€

The US census can’t be used to demonstrate the merits of race as a proxy for biology or ancestry - white is a group for the non-Black/non-othered & includes Northern European & North African folx

The authors then refer to ethnicity as a way to capture ā€œcommon values, cultural normsā€

The oversimplification is offensive. Hispanic/Latino is not a monolithic grouping of people. The authors even show in (figure 1) how different ancestry can be *within* this ethnic group.

That difference in ancestry translates to VERY different cultures in terms of food, customs, & even language. Sociopolitical relations also translate to different ways that people are treated based on the precise origins of their Hispanic identity.