7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
I’m just going to lay this down now so it’s on record:

Trump’s campaign has used the exact same strategy it used in 2016: smear his opponent; attempt to demotivate their base; and actively attempt to prevent or obstruct them from voting.

It is a push-down strategy.

1/


In 2016, didn’t win because he made a winning case to a big enough population.

He won because his opponent’s turnout was pushed down by a full-court press that tapped everything from misogyny to poll tampering.

2/

He is trying to run the exact same playbook against Biden.

But it isn’t working because:

1) We now understand it

2) Many who were effectively suppressed last time have had four years to see what that cost

3) Biden isn’t susceptible to the same illegitimate biases

3/

And 4) Many people who first engaged with politics because of Bernie are now well past the “...or Bust” vibe of 2016 and are now solidly active progressive voters

The media, pundits and analysts never fully reckoned with the extent to which Hillary’s vote was just suppressed.
4/

Instead, they overestimated Trump’s strength.

Trump only won by smothering just enough of his opponent’s support.

Some of the voters who that succeeded with in 2016 are vehemently un-smotherable this time.

5/
Short complilation of Trump Parades

Don’t know if it’s significant, but it appears that Trump enthusiasm is high

P.S.-don’t block roads

Arizona


California


Pennsylvania


Israel?


Virginia
What if Biden is actually good at this and Twitter, whose cognoscenti insisted for the entire primary that he wasn't, is actually bad at this?

Just a thought.


Biden's extraordinary polling strength, which by the way predates the coronavirus outbreak, is as much a repudiation of the political elite's collective wisdom as Trump's victory was. We should be talking more about why the elites keeping getting the electorate completely wrong.


Here's one obvious reason this keeps happening: A constant overemphasis on the votes and issues of the young, who don't typically vote, and an disinterest in the votes of seniors, who are most likely to vote. Trump won them in 2016. Biden is winning them in 2020. Take note!


Old folks are not on Twitter. They don't drive the social media conversation. Most campaign reporters are young, and naturally gravitate towards the issues of their generation. But this leads to reporting that doesn't align with the driving concerns of much of the electorate.


This is convenient, but wrong. Biden has been polling this well against Trump since late 2019. Other Democratic candidates like Warren and even Bernie (who polled pretty well) did not. This difference requires explanation if we are being honest and not projecting our preferences.
1/ WHO's WHO & how did we get here?? HINDSIGHT=2020
#InnocenceProject Corrupt too? Like ACLU, RedCross,SEIU,BLM,CIA,FBI,DOJ,IRS,USPTO,FCC,SEC, under RenegadeObama?EXCLUSIVE: Valerie Jarrett Joins Board of Directors for the Innocence Project ;via=Snip Daily

2/Is #ShadowGovt doing Education Infiltration too?Former Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett joins Ariel Investment
https://t.co/qYKxDHi3T3 founder&chairmanJohnW.RogersJr. a longtime friend of Obama's. Former ObamaSec'y of Education Arne Duncan also was appointed toAriel board

3/Is #ShadowGovt trying to wreck UBER in favor of corrupting LYFT?Lyft appoints former Obama adviser to board | https://t.co/X07u3OfxxN... Ride-hailing company Lyft Inc said on Monday it appointed Valerie Jarrett, an adviser to former President Barack Obama, to its board.

Facebook? #ShadowGovt Is this how DARPA gets in, hmm?
Facebook Goes Into Overdrive - Appoints Former Top Obama Advisor to Board of Directors

4/This list can go on..and on..an ON. It's not just aSWAMP, it's a deliberate &structured Parallel Construct by the prior Regime to OVERTHROW Our American Government from within: Beginning with CORRUPTING the Transition of Power, & ending w/ STEALING A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.. If
People are already attacking Siegel as a 'Fox News guy'.

See...this is why I don't believe the Left really believes in science either...just their narrative.

Siegel does work for Fox, but is a Professor at NYU, FACP, etc.

But liberals are going to dismiss him...why?


If your first response is to dismiss someone because of their political or media affiliation...maybe consider that it is YOU that is the biased one.

Just saying.

Siegel may do a good job, or bad job (like Sanjay Gupta, who has done a good job in the past, but been awful of late). But he is a good physician. Just dismissing him without evidence is exactly the kind of thing Trump would do.

If we were consistent, we'd demand Biden perform tests on air too.

Of course, Dems don't want to do that. So there is a ton of hypocrisy here.