It's lovely to see Tove Ditlevsen gaining her deserved recognition in the world! But it is not true that she is unanimously celebrated in Denmark. She has always been at the center of a almost century long discussion of taste and literary quality. Thread
@PenguinUKBooks @fsgbooks

Just this Saturday, in an article in major Danish newspaper Politiken about Ditlevsens' emerging international succes, the journalist wrote that she "had never reached modernism".
Ditlevsen has been taught in Danish schools as the harper's article says, but 15 years ago in 2006 (she died in the 1970ies!) the omission of her poems on a list for mandatory poems for schoolchildren sparked a fierce debate.
Head of the committee selecting the poems stated that Ditlevsen simply did not meet their standard for quality. No other female writers (or writers of color) had poems on the list. It contained 24 poems from the Middle ages - today. You can see it here: https://t.co/5fFhUJi9tf
This list was issued by the Ministry of culture in a dare I say right wing attempt by the prime minister at the time Anders Fogh Rasmussen to dominate the cultural debate and make way for a shift in values. In this he was succesful.
In her own lifetime Ditlevsens book did not necessarily receive good reviews. It is true that she won prizes (De gyldne lauerbær famously being for having sold well).
What is interesting in her story is not that has been "forgotten" - she never went out of print. She is dearly loved by Danish readers, songs with her lyrics are played at parties, everyone knows her name.
Despite her enormous popularity spanding several decades, the literary recognition of her work has been somewhat absent. She has been seen as a celebrity, trash, "housewife fiction". Words like "sentimental" and "kliché" stuck to her name.
I have talked to multiple students at the Literary faculty in the University in Copenhagen being advised against doing papers on her, because her writing was not deemed 'serious'.
This all began to change around 2015. Theater group Sort Samvittighed staged a play about her life at the Royal theater. Together we published a collection of her forgotten nonfiction texts, titled "I wanted to be a widow, I wanted to be a poet."
At the time I was just hired as en editor at Gyldendal and began to reissue her books. Only Dependency was issued as a classic in Gyldendal's series of classics. And only a few years earlier. Her selected poems had been in print forever.
I started to reissue her books, avoiding the classics series (also I was a junior editor, I didn't had that kind of pull) beginning with the first to volumes of The Copenhagen trilogy, The Widow book, Faces and Vilhelm's room.
The widow-book became a hit and a collection of her poetry published two years later (I did the edit) became a bestseller 100 years after Tove Ditlevsens was born.
Think pieces about "Tove-fever" were everywhere. A another play about her life was staged to great succes. Still the literary gatekeepers were reluctant to acknowledge her as an important artist in Scandinavian literature. Trying to get around it with "important cultural figure".
It was intersting, but not suprising, to see critics fighting against this canonization of Tove Ditlevsen (remember the quarrel in 2006). Heres a quote from Mikkel Bruun Zangenberg in Weekendavisen from 2018:
I pulled the translation of this qoute from here: https://t.co/Ys5ei0uo9c
You can read an interesting run-through of the debate at the time (yes, of course we have passionate literary debates in Denmark!)
Back to the quote. It echoes the Harper's article. Is the succes of Ditlevsen and authors alike in part because of a great marketing strategy? I also like how he went after my looks on instagram. You know you onto something when they go for your womanly looks!
Also, Hekseskolen does not teach it's student to take selfies or post on instagram. We held literary studies ind ... Tove Ditlevsen, Ingeborg Bachmann, Hiromi Itō etc. But you know ... it's probably just selfies.
While editing the Widow-book, one of our great Danish poets told me that it was a shame that Tove Ditlevsen never learned to write about anything but her own life. Otherwise she could have been one of the greats.
This taps into the idea of female life (and all minority experience) as being personal, individual and not of common experience. This is why she is "forgotten" og maybe a better word would be misunderstood.
Works by female and minority writers of Ditlevsens generation (born 1910's, Shirley Jackson could be another example) are discussed in this matter all the time. They have not been afforded literary research, work about style, metaphor, form.
It is worth to notice each time this happens - usually it is a sign that we cannot enter the work with the literary tools we usually use. The work is doing something else.
The central literary modes of style at the time of Ditlevsens life were not available to her, because the world of ideas and values it described did not admit her access. She had to find out how language would shape itself around her experience.
I hav believed for quite some time that this is not modernism. There is some parallel artistic wave, and I see this in works from many continents. Ionly have one more tweet available in this thread, but honestly I could go on forever.
This work, rethinking writers, and lives, voices, that did not fall pleasantly into place in history, is central to everything I do. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

More from World

You May Also Like

The first ever world map was sketched thousands of years ago by Indian saint
“Ramanujacharya” who simply translated the following verse from Mahabharat and gave the world its real face

In Mahabharat,it is described how 'Maharishi Ved Vyasa' gave away his divine vision to Sanjay


Dhritarashtra's charioteer so that he could describe him the events of the upcoming war.

But, even before questions of war could begin, Dhritarashtra asked him to describe how the world looks like from space.

This is how he described the face of the world:

सुदर्शनं प्रवक्ष्यामि द्वीपं तु कुरुनन्दन। परिमण्डलो महाराज द्वीपोऽसौ चक्रसंस्थितः॥
यथा हि पुरुषः पश्येदादर्शे मुखमात्मनः। एवं सुदर्शनद्वीपो दृश्यते चन्द्रमण्डले॥ द्विरंशे पिप्पलस्तत्र द्विरंशे च शशो महान्।

—वेद व्यास, भीष्म पर्व, महाभारत


Meaning:-

हे कुरुनन्दन ! सुदर्शन नामक यह द्वीप चक्र की भाँति गोलाकार स्थित है, जैसे पुरुष दर्पण में अपना मुख देखता है, उसी प्रकार यह द्वीप चन्द्रमण्डल में दिखायी देता है। इसके दो अंशो मे पीपल और दो अंशो मे विशाल शश (खरगोश) दिखायी देता है।


Meaning: "Just like a man sees his face in the mirror, so does the Earth appears in the Universe. In the first part you see leaves of the Peepal Tree, and in the next part you see a Rabbit."

Based on this shloka, Saint Ramanujacharya sketched out the map, but the world laughed
Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.

He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...


... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:


Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.

Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9


Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."

I wonder why...

Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x


Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.

Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq
**Thread on Bravery of Sikhs**
(I am forced to do this due to continuous hounding of Sikh Extremists since yesterday)

Rani Jindan Kaur, wife of Maharaja Ranjit Singh had illegitimate relations with Lal Singh (PM of Ranjit Singh). Along with Lal Singh, she attacked Jammu, burnt - https://t.co/EfjAq59AyI


Hindu villages of Jasrota, caused rebellion in Jammu, attacked Kishtwar.

Ancestors of Raja Ranjit Singh, The Sansi Tribe used to give daughters as concubines to Jahangir.


The Ludhiana Political Agency (Later NW Fronties Prov) was formed by less than 4000 British soldiers who advanced from Delhi and reached Ludhiana, receiving submissions of all sikh chiefs along the way. The submission of the troops of Raja of Lahore (Ranjit Singh) at Ambala.

Dabistan a contemporary book on Sikh History tells us that Guru Hargobind broke Naina devi Idol Same source describes Guru Hargobind serving a eunuch
YarKhan. (ref was proudly shared by a sikh on twitter)
Gobind Singh followed Bahadur Shah to Deccan to fight for him.


In Zafarnama, Guru Gobind Singh states that the reason he was in conflict with the Hill Rajas was that while they were worshiping idols, while he was an idol-breaker.

And idiot Hindus place him along Maharana, Prithviraj and Shivaji as saviours of Dharma.