Categories Trading
Would love to know about some of yours.
@saxena_puru @BrianFeroldi @GavinSBaker @7Innovator @dhaval_kotecha @Gautam__Baid @richard_chu97 @10kdiver @FromValue @investing_city
Below thread has the references to each of these 10 concepts.
Note : Many of these are my past Tweets related to these topics. Not trying to self promote them. Adding them only because they have the original links, added context and my highlights & fav pts.
Let's dive in. ⬇️⬇️
1⃣ Benjamin Graham's Mr. Market analogy.
An extremely useful concept, especially when
Market is panicking (& throwing out good Co's at bargain prices) & when
Market is too complacent (& awarding high valuations to hype and
Excellent compilation of quotes from Benjamin Graham's "The Intelligent Investor". \U0001f44f
— Ram Bhupatiraju (@RamBhupatiraju) May 25, 2020
cc: @dmuthuk @Gautam__Baidhttps://t.co/LNKNVXVj1b
2⃣ Philip Fisher's hyper-focus on growth stocks (written 60 years ago).
Very useful and mostly still applicable stuff on how to deeply analyze Growth Co's (except Stock based Compensation & Adjusted EBITDA of
Great summary of Philip Fisher's "Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits". It's no secret that this is one of THE BEST books for Individual investors but it's still enlightening to re-read the book or these summaries.\U0001f44d
— Ram Bhupatiraju (@RamBhupatiraju) June 4, 2020
cc:@saxena_puru @Gautam__Baid @dmuthukhttps://t.co/u16X3CKj8V
3⃣ Peter Lynch’s empowering writing on the edge of the individual investor when they invest in what they know (or can
Peter Lynch's "Use Your Edge" essay has some great lessons for individual investors. \U0001f44f
— Ram Bhupatiraju (@RamBhupatiraju) November 25, 2020
Solid advice at the end of the article (my fav points highlighted).\U0001f447https://t.co/nkUVDh0NVA pic.twitter.com/aQ1eFr2SGC
E19 is HERE \U0001f4a7\U0001f426\U0001f4a7
— The All-In Podcast \U0001f4a7\U0001f426 (@theallinpod) January 30, 2021
Breaking down & debating Robinhood's decision:
-- understanding the full WSB saga
-- how/why it happened
-- how it can be prevented in the future & more
\U0001f447\U0001f447
\U0001f50a: https://t.co/w8QSGBUQSi
\U0001f4fa: https://t.co/OU5W2qn7JN
Like he actually connects the two and mentions collateral requirements and says RH should go to jail
This is maybe the worst discussion I’ve heard of GME from people who clearly know better. They’re encouraging people to “watch billions” to understand how hedge funds work.
Oh just got to the point where they call for a short term transaction tax to REPLACE the capital gains tax.
Chamath calls lowering the cap gains tax “genius”
Oh now Chamath believes the class actions will work because of the “implied losses,” because users clearly lost tens of billions theoretical gains!
The solution is to move accounts to other brokers (like sofi)
Long-term expectations do not change as frequently as daily market fluctuations would make it seem.
A quick update on Treasury rates through the lens of the DKW model
*As of Dec. 31*
1/
In previous threads, I made the distinction between long-term secular trends in growth and inflation and shorter-term (2-6 quarters) trends in nGDP
Consensus continues to conflate the inflation story, mixing and matching long-term and short-term charts to fit what is generally a secular inflation narrative.
— Eric Basmajian (@EPBResearch) January 4, 2021
Here are my two cents to make the distinction clear.
1)
Right now, the long-term trends are unaltered because long-term trends just don't change that fast but we have a very strong cyclical upturn in the economy, centered primarily on the shift to goods consumption bolstering the manufacturing sector and industrial commodities.
3/
As long as the industrial sector continues to roar, TSY rates will have an upward bias as rates generally follow the trend in nGDP growth
A 10yr TSY has longterm expectations embedded in the rate so several qrters, while important, won't necessarily change the longterm trend
4/
This is confirmed by the Dec update to the DKW model which breaks down *actual* inflation expectations, the expected real short-term rate (real growth), term premium, liquidity premium etc.
The DKW model is one of many models that is useful but has many limitations.
5/
A summary on Mirror Protocol, how it works, and its potential
🧵👇
1/
@mirror_protocol is a decentralized synthetics protocol built primarily on Terra blockchain. It enables users to gain exposure to various real-world assets (stocks, cryptocurrencies, etc.) through the creation and trading of on-chain synthetic assets, called mAssets
2/
At the time of writing, the assets supported consists mainly of US-based equities (e.g. $FB, $AMZN, $ABNB), with other asset class such as cryptocurrencies coming in the pipeline starting with $BTC and $ETH, as well as a number of others currently in governance voting process
3/
The protocol the offers numerous advantages and benefits over traditional exchanges and markets
4/
1) First, unlike the example that we saw with Robinhood this week, there's no central entity with the power to pause/restrict trading on any asset, much less the ridiculous one-sided disablement of buying or selling that we've
Robinhood restricted crypto trading due to "extraordinary market conditions" and Coinbase is investigating a site outage LMAO
— Larry Cermak (@lawmaster) January 29, 2021
#bitcoin $36k calls which saw whale buying at 87% IV are finally seeing a large drop in OI... Sales coming in at 136%@CanteringClark @7ommyZero @samchepal @OptionPit @Options @DeribitExchange pic.twitter.com/HC12MA6V13
— GenesisVolatility (@GenesisVol) January 12, 2021
2. The $36k JAN-29-2021 calls began trading on @DeribitExchange on Oct. 31, 2020 and had an initial delta of around 3%. At this time, BTC’s index price was trading around $13.5k. On this date, it seemed like a long shot that prices could do a ~3x within 90 days.
3. My guess is the buyer of these calls was trading a re-pricing of risk as opposed to speculating that the price of BTC would actually be >= $36k on Jan 29/2021 (one thing we can say with confidence is they were smart and used @tradeparadigm to avoid massive slippage).
4. This thread does an excellent job explaining how traders can make money by trading relative probabilities.
BIG BTC TRADE!
— Rob Levy (@robbylevy) October 22, 2020
Yesterday there was a buyer of over 5000 BTC $50,000 calls expiring December 31, 2021.
Buyer paid from $1,100 up to $1,200 per call option.
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN??
Time for a thread \U0001f447\U0001f447\U0001f447
5. If the trader believed the market was pricing too low of a probability for an option reaching ITM, they could purchase options with the intention of selling them before maturity once the market’s expectations become more bullish (as we’ve seen over the past few weeks).
They don't call him the ZOG Emperor for nothing. pic.twitter.com/QkEObaF7FC
— Johnny Gat (@vigilante_intel) December 30, 2020
I have repeatedly warned about the section 230 issue. You don't repeal it, you reform/enforce it. This will be a death blow to alternative tech platforms like GAB, who do not have teams of corporate lawyers to field frivolous lawfare attacks that will be waged if this happens...
It will give big tech the excuse they need to ban & censor even more accounts and to *really* act us publishers, editorializing. It gives them the excuse that they no longer have immunity and thus have to censor to avoid legal liability for posts/user behavior...
This will then cement the big tech companies who do have teams of corporate lawyers monopolies. This is what silicon valley has been lobbying for. They want to he regulated so they can use that as an excuse to purge content they don't like...
Removing section 230 will be the end of the internet as we know it. It will be the end of alt tech platforms like Gab that so many conservatives have been relegated to. So why are "Republicans" pushing to disenfranchise their own constituents even more? Because big donors want it