💥and so it begins..💥
It's time, my friends 🤩🤩

[Thread] #ProjectOdin

https://t.co/fO90N78fta
new quantum-based internet #ElonMusk #QVS #QFS #ProjectOdin

https://t.co/lA6N2ZpCFJ
Political justification ⏬⏬
#ProjectOdin
#ProjectOdin #Starlink #ElonMusk #QuantumInternet
Beyond imagination 🤩
even the one of #ElonMusk 😎😎

#ProjectOdin #Starlink #QuantumInternet
backup of backup of backup 👻
Days of healing darkness will come😉
#NothingCanStopWhatIsComing
"If we can't fix it.. we left & found better ways" 😎
#Starlink Satellite Internet explained
#ProjectOdin
https://t.co/30n40s4ECu
https://t.co/rdfoDNS3GE
😉 #ProjectOdin #Starlink #Odin
https://t.co/jshgOTUgwy
@threadreaderapp please unroll

More from Science

JUST ONE PERSON—UK 🇬🇧 scientists think one immunocompromised person who cleared virus slowly & only partially wiped out an infection, leaving behind genetically-hardier viruses that rebound & learn how to survive better. That’s likely how #B117 started. 🧵 https://t.co/bMMjM8Hiuz


2) The leading hypothesis is that the new variant evolved within just one person, chronically infected with the virus for so long it was able to evolve into a new, more infectious form.

same thing happened in Boston in another immunocompromised person that was sick for 155 days.

3) What happened in Boston with one 45 year old man who was highly infectious for 155 days straight before he died... is exactly what scientists think happened in Kent, England that gave rise to #B117.


4) Doctors were shocked to find virus has evolved many different forms inside of this one immunocompromised man. 20 new mutations in one virus, akin to the #B117. This is possibly how #B1351 in South Africa 🇿🇦 and #P1 in Brazil 🇧🇷 also evolved.


5) “On its own, the appearance of a new variant in genomic databases doesn’t tell us much. “That’s just one genome amongst thousands every week. It wouldn’t necessarily stick out,” says Oliver Pybus, a professor of evolution and infectious disease at Oxford.

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?