Waist Trainers are useless.
It’s a scam, a fraud and a deceit.

They use ladies who already have slim waists and flat tummies to advertise it.

If you wear it for “fashion”, that’s ok.
If you wear it for flat tummy, you are fooling yourself and wasting your money.

Happy weekend.

Waist trainers can harm you
Waist trainers can harm you.

Can cause skin irritation,
Can cause organ damage,
Can worsen heartburn,
Can cause breathing problems,
Cannot cause weight loss,
Cannot give flat tummy,

Sorry to break your heart
But actually, waist trainers can harm you.
Waist trainers cannot give you any curves that you never had naturally.

If you have the curve already,
A waist trainer may help it show.
If you never had any curves,
A waist trainer can never give you one.

If the hourglass was never there,
A waist trainer won’t give you one.
Waist trainers can’t cause flat tummy.
And it surely canNOT give you “curves”.

You take soft drinks, eat junk food, and swallow Eba at 2am like a hired killer;

If you like wear waist trainer,
Once you remove it, your tummy will fall down on your thighs like the wall of Jericho.
What a waist trainer does is to give you an ILLUSION of a flat tummy or a curvy appearance.But it is a temporary illusion.

A waist trainer NEVER changes your body on the long term, never gives you a flat tummy and it can NEVER make you curvy. Except you already had it naturally.
The truth of the matter is there are NO easy or quick fixes to a big tummy.
Those who tell you otherwise are playing on your ignorance and taking you for an idiot.

If you want a flat tummy-
You have to WORK for it-

Discipline your diet,
Cut out junk/soft drinks,
Join a gym.
Celebs like Kim Kardashian and Niki Minaj do cosmetic surgery for a banging body, then tell you to wear waist trainer as though that’s how they got their hot bodies.

Don’t be a fool.

There is NO scientific evidence ANYWHERE that waist trainers give flat tummy or better curves.
What you do with a waist trainer is squeezing your tummy into an unnatural inconvenient position for a temporary illusion of a hot body- but it can NEVER give you any permanent results.

Because once you take off the waist trainer, the breeze will blow and fowlyansh will show.
If you really want a flat tummy,
You have to be ready to work hard for it- there are NO fast answers, NO easy routes and surely NO quick fixes.

Sit-ups, abdominal crunches and plank poses are exercise routines that can give you that. Google them to learn more.

Or join a gym.
People are putting their internal organs at risk just to achieve a body image that is only temporary.

Again, there is NO scientific evidence to support the wildly believed claims of ‘waist training’, however there is scientific proof that it can have very negative side effects.
We know it can worsen heartburn for people. It can cause back pain and poor posture. It can cause you problems with breathing.

With prolonged use, it can damage your internal organs like your liver and intestine. But above all, it can cause you depression- Because it’s ALL lies.
And also the psychological damage it does to women.

You constantly remind yourself of how much you dislike your body and are being fooled into thinking that your ideal figure can only come thru a waist trainer.

Yet we know that with diet and exercise discipline, YOU can do it.
The people who aggressively market waist trainers as the magical answer to a banging body exploit your obsession over how you look and they cash out over your total ignorance about the fact that waist trainers can achieve NO permanent significant results.

It’s a WASTE of time.
In conclusion: Two things I want you to take away from today’s post;
1. Waist trainers is NOT the (long term) answer to a better looking body. It’s a scam and a fraud.

2. Waist trainers can seriously HARM you in many ways that you never know. They are NOT harmless.

Tell others.

More from Health

this simple, counter narrative fact keeps cropping up all over the world.

hospital and ICU utilization has been and remains low this year.

it's terribly curious that so few of these monitoring tools provide historical baselines.

getting them is like pulling teeth.


we might think of this as an oversight until you see stuff like this:

this woman was arrested for filming and sharing the fact that their are empty hospitals in the UK.

that's full blown soviet. what possible honest purpose does that

this is the action of a police state and a propaganda ministry, not a well intentioned government and a public heath agency.

"we cannot let people see the truth for fear they might base their actions on real facts" is not much of a mantra for just governance.


90% full ICU sounds scary until you realize that 90-100% full is normal in flu season.

staffed ICU beds are expensive to leave empty. it's like flying with 15% of the plane empty. hospitals don't do that.

and all US hospitals are mandated to be able to flex to 120% ICU.

the US is currently at historically low ICU utilization for this time of year.

61% is "you're all going to go out of business" territory as is 66% full hospital use.

can you blame them for mining CARES act money? they'll die without it.
Now you know I love to sh-t in Harvard. But I also like accuracy. So I decided to go look at Harvard’s catalog to see its lack of military history that this article describes (they only teach history of pets it claims) and what I found shocked me! Shocked me! A thread: 1/


First off, Harvard students literally have multiple sections of military history that they can take listed. (It appears these ones are taught at MIT, so they might have to walk down the street for these) but... 2/


Say they want to stay on campus...they can only take numerous classes on war and diplomacy...3/


They have an entire class on Yalta. That’s right. An entire class on Yalta. 4/


But wait! There is more! They can take the British Empire, The Fall of the Roman Empire for those wanting traditional topics... 5/
Some thoughts on this: Firstly, it might be personal preference, but I am not keen on this kind of campaign as I feel like it trivialises cancer. Sometimes the serious message gets lost because people are sharing pics of cats or whatever and the important context is gone.


More importantly, the statistic being used in the campaign is misleading. It says 57% of women put off cervical screening if they can't get waxed. But on further investigation, that's not accurate.

The page here goes on to say "57% of women who regularly have their pubic hair professionally removed would put off attending their cervical screening appointment if they hadn’t been able to visit a beauty salon."

So the 57% represents a concern not across the whole population of women, but only those who regularly get waxed. So how big of an issue is this across the whole population? And what else is stopping people getting smears?

I think campaigns for cancer screening are really tricky because there is so much nuance that often doesn't fit into a catchy headline or hashtag. It's certainly not easy and is part of a bigger conversation.

You May Also Like