In Brahm Puran, Brahma preached this to Marichi. So this Puran of ten thousand shlokas is called Brahm Puran.
STORY OF PURANAS AND SUB PURANA (उप पुराण).
We have already gone through the series on importance & characteristics of all the eighteen Purans. We also know that originally there were hundred crore shlokas but were divided by Vyas in each Kalp and was compiled as eighteen Purans
In Brahm Puran, Brahma preached this to Marichi. So this Puran of ten thousand shlokas is called Brahm Puran.
Vishnu Puran is primarily based in Varah kalp. This book is on Vishnu and this book has twenty three thousand shlokas.
In Bhagwat Puran, which is written with the base of Gayatri mantra describes Dharma extensively. It has 18000 shlokas. It also mentions the story of Vritrasur.
Markandeya Puran has nine thousand shlokas and here it is through the birds that Dharma is described.
In Bhavishya Puran, based in Aghor Kalp, Brahma preaches to Manu about the importance of Surya and foresees the future or bhavishya happenings. It has 14500 shlokas.
In Vamaan Puran Brahma describes the importance of Trivikrampur through Dharma, Arth and Kaam. It has ten thousand shlokas.
In Matsya Puran, in the very beginning, Bhagwan in the form of Matsya/fish encourages the Rishis,
Garud Puran describes the origin of Universe as told by Vishnu to Garud. Based in Garud Kalp, this book has 18000 shlokas.
In Brahmand Puran Brahma describes the future Kalps. It has twelve thousand shlokas.
The Sub Purans are as follows
Sanat Kumar
Narsingh
Skand
Nandishwar
Durvaasa
Narad
Kapil
Manu
Ushna
Brahmand
Varun
Kalika
Maheshwar
Saamb
Saur
Parashar
Marichi
Bhargav
So this way we get to know the importance of some in these sub purans.
Instagram link 👇
https://t.co/pidcghlLSe
Facebook link👇
https://t.co/EVyZz1frHQ
https://t.co/A6sXofFJZC
#THREAD
— Anshul Pandey (@Anshulspiritual) January 10, 2021
PURANAS.
SO I HAVE INCLUDED ALL THE PURANAS IMPORTANCE AND CHARACTERISTICS
From BRAMHA PURAN to BRAHMANDA PURAN
This thread is for those ppl who missed my PURAN series. All the Puranas are included in the below thread.
So lets start..... pic.twitter.com/4R9myViMn7
https://t.co/emKZTtHNw9
More from Anshul Pandey
WHY DID KING DAKSH BEHAVE NEGATIVELY TOWARDS SHIVA AND SATI.
It was actually the shakti form of devi which took birth as Sati in Daksh's house who acquired this name due to her satya swarup.
Everyone is aware of the story as to why Sati jumped into the Yagya fire.
But there is a story behind the reason for the negative behaviour of Daksh.
It so happened that once Rishi Durvasa went to Devi Jambunadeshwari and after her darshan recited the Mayabeej mantra. The devi happily gave him a divine Garland. Durvasa happily accepted it and left.
On his way he met Daksh who was eager to get the divine Garland. He requested the Rishi to give him that Garland. Knowing that Daksh was a good person, Durvasa gave the garland to him.
But Daksh casually kept the garland on his bed and went about doing his earthly instinctive work. Due to this insulting behaviour of Daksh for the divine garland, he developed a negative feeling for Shiva and Sati(Aadi Shakti).
Source - Devi puran
Instagram link👇
https://t.co/papGLZvcaI
Facebook
It was actually the shakti form of devi which took birth as Sati in Daksh's house who acquired this name due to her satya swarup.
Everyone is aware of the story as to why Sati jumped into the Yagya fire.
But there is a story behind the reason for the negative behaviour of Daksh.
It so happened that once Rishi Durvasa went to Devi Jambunadeshwari and after her darshan recited the Mayabeej mantra. The devi happily gave him a divine Garland. Durvasa happily accepted it and left.
On his way he met Daksh who was eager to get the divine Garland. He requested the Rishi to give him that Garland. Knowing that Daksh was a good person, Durvasa gave the garland to him.
But Daksh casually kept the garland on his bed and went about doing his earthly instinctive work. Due to this insulting behaviour of Daksh for the divine garland, he developed a negative feeling for Shiva and Sati(Aadi Shakti).
Source - Devi puran
Instagram link👇
https://t.co/papGLZvcaI
THE ONLY TIME WHEN DURYODHAN AND DUSHASAN HELPED YUDHISHTIR I.E DURING RAJSUYA YAGYA / ARRAGEMENTS OF RAJSUYA YAGYA!!
https://t.co/64r7BmTN6N
https://t.co/vwg4NFMYgy
https://t.co/CtFXR0TNrx
Instagram link👇
https://t.co/0E8eGSiUmr
Facebook link👇
https://t.co/j1XLUq4oBM
#InspiredBySwamiAnjaninandanDass
#MahabharatPositivity - Sabha Parva
https://t.co/64r7BmTN6N
https://t.co/vwg4NFMYgy
https://t.co/CtFXR0TNrx
Instagram link👇
https://t.co/0E8eGSiUmr
Facebook link👇
https://t.co/j1XLUq4oBM
#InspiredBySwamiAnjaninandanDass
#MahabharatPositivity - Sabha Parva
More from Religion
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.