Mollyycolllinss Categories Society
I do *not* fuck with pimps.
I do not like pimps.
I think that they are generally scum.
But they probably don’t operate like how you imagine.
I feel like so many people don\u2019t know what a pimp actually is, like, in the real world, and that lack of understanding is often harmful to sex workers.
— \u2728Jessica Starling\u2728 (@J3ssicaStarling) December 24, 2020
Would anyone be interested in an educational thread based on my and other ppls experiences?
First, I wanna address the cultural conception of the “pimp”
This conception is based in white supremacy
It is a black and/or foreign man, who kidnaps little white girls and sells their innocence against their will with violence
This is what you’ve been told is a “pimp”
I need you to delete this from your brain because this caricature of white supremacist fear of physically and sexually aggressive black men does not exist
The first person in the sex industry who tried to be my “pimp” was a skinny 30 year old white woman who was also a stripper.
There’s a reason anti-SW orgs push the imagery of evil non-white men as pimps
I also need everyone to know 99.9999% of pimps are not in the business of kidnapping people and locking them in a hotel room against their will to service customers.
I can’t say it never ever ever ever could happen, but, the VAST majority of the time, it is not that
In the most foundational sense, unity exists whether we want it to or not. Our fortunes are tied together. We all impact each other. That form of unity carries risks, benefits, and, mostly, responsibilities. /1
Just curious on your perspective on the GOP calling for unity days after protesting the election results. They caused the rift and now we have to just move on? It's like an abuser hitting you then buying you flowers. Platitudes do not heal a wound.
— kathy cushing (@Kathycush) January 12, 2021
The trouble with calling for "unity" after you, say, abused a procedure to jeopardize and break trust and invite violence in the foundation of representative government, is that it sounds like a shield, not a shared responsibility. /2
It sounds like "we are all one, so there can be no critique of each other." But then saying, "and actually THOSE PEOPLE are the REAL problem" which turns it into "we are all one, but I am the best, so there can be no critique of me." /3
Living into our unity means that we absolutely have to look at each other sometimes and say "you are sorely wrong about this, and you must accept responsibility for your wrongness for the sake of all of us." /4
That does not equal "you should no longer exist and we hate you forever." If you are a United States Senator (for example) and you translate "there must be accountability" to "I've been banished along with 70+ million others," you're being immature and purposely disingenuous. /5
I'm saying no disabled person is oppressed specifically because they are or are seen as smart.
This..... this has been bothering me for a while actually. I say this as a disabled smart kid (though not gifted): I am so tired of disabled smart kid tears.
— TheDisabilityEnthusiast (@twitchyspoonie) January 13, 2021
Y'all are not oppressed because society thought you were smart. https://t.co/ZiyreEP0bt
When I asked for accommodations in school and they wouldn't give them to me because I'm "smart" (which is a social construct btw), I wasn't actually being oppressed because I was smart. I was being oppressed because I was disabled.
If the school didn't see me as smart, I would've been put into special ed, which is often extremely abusive and really its own layer of oppression. I would've been able to advocate for myself even less and much of my autonomy would've been even more stripped away.
I've experienced only the tiniest slice of what people who aren't perceived as intelligent have experienced and even then there's a marked difference.
People often don't see me as intelligent because they mistake my Tourette's for an intellectual disability or severe mental health issue.
For many, I am immediately more humanized as soon as I can speak coherent sentences and they recognize me as smart.
They are offered mainly 2 my liberal friends, who do not yet realise, how Gandhi will be deified again, as an exemplar of Hindu thought, to annihilate Dr B R Ambedkar, & bring back a redefined secularism.
https://t.co/uMs33oOu2E
https://t.co/ADv9gvxSJK
India’s Right Wing intellectuals, both on the economic right & left, liberal or orthodox, secular or Hindutvawadi, have long sought to discredit Arundhati Roy, as an outdated Marxist.
So the third slide is addressed to these denizens. I will let her speak 4 herself.
https://t.co/lEUrqIJ54n
Most unions aim to deliver benefits to members, even at cost to society. The new one at Google aims to charge members to deliver benefits to society. Let's see how far that goes (via @bopinion) https://t.co/fswlwP2j28
— Bloomberg Economics (@economics) January 8, 2021
1) "There’s an easy solution to that problem — go work somewhere else" - this suggestion is akin to right wing fascists telling dissidents to just leave when we disagree w their governance. Deciding to stay and be a positive change is CRUCIAL when a company like
Google is in all of our back-pockets-- literally. If every ethicist and conscientious objector simply leaves, the gross impact of this corporation is in a much worse place for all of, something that should trouble every Google user.
2) Claiming that full-timers fear losing our jobs to "cheap contractor labor" and noting "many temp workers put in the same hours as full-time employees, but with none of the insurance, benefits or worker protections" proves one of the reasons that contractor
solidarity is so important to the tech labor movement-- no one's labor should be arbitrarily devalued. @AlphabetWorkers is committed to fighting for fair treatment of contractors bc it's the right thing to do. Implying selfish motivations with no basis is petty & divisive.
What does good leadership look like when everyone works from home?\u2013Top scientists @raffasadun and Ernst Fehr will provide you with some answers on 27 January \u2013 online and for free in our Academy of Behavioral Economics https://t.co/Di6hRqPvAA
— G. Duttweiler Inst' (@GDInstitute) January 15, 2021
Ernst Fehr is talking about evidence and challenges of work at home arrangements.
Key question: Do we have the technological capacities to work at home? And is it a trend or a sustainable transformation?
Ernst Fehr @econ_uzh #EconomicsForSociety
Will this prevail in the long-run?
Ernst Fehr @econ_uzh #EconomicsForSociety
The problem of sustaining cooperation in the long-run: How do we prevent the deterioration of collaboration?
Ernst Fehr @econ_uzh #EconomicsForSociety
If you would like to donate, but don't use facebook, you can also donate here: https://t.co/oIuAf5WXRm
Truthout is an indy abolitionist publication and we are 89% reader funded. That’s why we are still here, on a corporate news landscape, where independent news is largely dying. Our work is sustained because the people who read (and listen to) our content believe in what we do.
People also donate out of respect for how TO treats its workers. When the pandemic began, we all got a “preparation day” off and a $200 stipend to fill our freezers. We also have unlimited sick leave. Keep in mind, we're an indy, reader-funded publication. https://t.co/o3hI1VrXMu
We also have the most generous parental leave plan in the industry, unlimited bereavement, and unlimited days off for staff grappling with climate catastrophes. https://t.co/o3hI1VamnU