7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
1/ WHO's WHO & how did we get here?? HINDSIGHT=2020
#InnocenceProject Corrupt too? Like ACLU, RedCross,SEIU,BLM,CIA,FBI,DOJ,IRS,USPTO,FCC,SEC, under RenegadeObama?EXCLUSIVE: Valerie Jarrett Joins Board of Directors for the Innocence Project ;via=Snip Daily

2/Is #ShadowGovt doing Education Infiltration too?Former Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett joins Ariel Investment
https://t.co/qYKxDHi3T3 founder&chairmanJohnW.RogersJr. a longtime friend of Obama's. Former ObamaSec'y of Education Arne Duncan also was appointed toAriel board

3/Is #ShadowGovt trying to wreck UBER in favor of corrupting LYFT?Lyft appoints former Obama adviser to board | https://t.co/X07u3OfxxN... Ride-hailing company Lyft Inc said on Monday it appointed Valerie Jarrett, an adviser to former President Barack Obama, to its board.

Facebook? #ShadowGovt Is this how DARPA gets in, hmm?
Facebook Goes Into Overdrive - Appoints Former Top Obama Advisor to Board of Directors

4/This list can go on..and on..an ON. It's not just aSWAMP, it's a deliberate &structured Parallel Construct by the prior Regime to OVERTHROW Our American Government from within: Beginning with CORRUPTING the Transition of Power, & ending w/ STEALING A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.. If
What if Biden is actually good at this and Twitter, whose cognoscenti insisted for the entire primary that he wasn't, is actually bad at this?

Just a thought.


Biden's extraordinary polling strength, which by the way predates the coronavirus outbreak, is as much a repudiation of the political elite's collective wisdom as Trump's victory was. We should be talking more about why the elites keeping getting the electorate completely wrong.


Here's one obvious reason this keeps happening: A constant overemphasis on the votes and issues of the young, who don't typically vote, and an disinterest in the votes of seniors, who are most likely to vote. Trump won them in 2016. Biden is winning them in 2020. Take note!


Old folks are not on Twitter. They don't drive the social media conversation. Most campaign reporters are young, and naturally gravitate towards the issues of their generation. But this leads to reporting that doesn't align with the driving concerns of much of the electorate.


This is convenient, but wrong. Biden has been polling this well against Trump since late 2019. Other Democratic candidates like Warren and even Bernie (who polled pretty well) did not. This difference requires explanation if we are being honest and not projecting our preferences.
THREAD: This is it. Election Day is upon us! Here's what you need to know. First, we are CLOSED today in order to make it easy for all our staff to vote, volunteer as poll workers and monitors, and otherwise be involved in our Democracy. We will return to normal hours tomorrow.

1/ If you've yet to vote, go to
https://t.co/4sDkivd6rc to get all the info you need. Be sure to bring a mask and whatever voter ID your state requires. If you have a mail-in ballot, DO NOT MAIL IT IN: go to https://t.co/yf60tNfk2O to find out where you can drop it off. If you've

2/ voted, thank you! Now remind at least THREE friends / family members to do the same. Vote Tripling is proven to be extremely effective; don't assume someone has voted. A nudge from you can make all the difference. Again, https://t.co/4sDkivd6rc has all the info they need.

3/ If you have any questions about voting, or experience voter intimidation, call, text, or chat with the @VoterProtection hotline: https://t.co/LheFc5O2ZJ. Know your rights: no one can prevent you from exercising your sacred right to vote!

4/ If you need a ride to the polls, both @lyft and @Uber are offering discounted rides, or you can do an online search for volunteers offering rides to the polls in your area. Before you vote, be informed: click here to find what's on your ballot:
So shortly after the 2016 election, I pointed out how odd it was that the Reason homepage was dominated by stories either mocking and ridiculing the left for being fearful of what was to come, or articles about how Trump might actually be good for libertarians.


Now, in 2020, we have one party so upset about the election, they’re openly fomenting a crisis of democracy. Here’s the Reason homepage today. There’s one article about all of that. There’s a hell of a lot more about the threat posed by Joe Biden. And more riciduling the left.


I’m picking on Reason. And I’ll add that there are people there who have sufficiently grasped the threat the last four years, despite the general editorial direction of the magazine. But it really underscores the disappointment I’ve had with my fellow libertarians in general ...

... in the Trump era. We’re supposed to be the alarmists. Proudly! We’re supposed to the ones who overreact when government overreaches. Because alarmism is a hell of a lot better than complacency. And history tells us that governments tend not to give powers ...

... back once they’ve claimed them. In the Trump era, too many libertarians not only stopped being alarmists, they spent most of their time scolding and ridiculing the people who were. I mean, it’s still bizarre to me that the philosophy that ...
Scientifically, there should be a single consistent standard.

As long as that is true, it's fine.

Cuomo's standard was neither consistent nor scientific. That is a clear first amendment violation.


Gorsuch is SCIENTIFICALLY RIGHT HERE.

If people can't admit that, then they are allowing their biases to


This on the other hand is 100% BS.

Not a single scientist I know supports this double standard. The best ones know that the type ofvenue is irrelevant... Only the size and # of people


In short, it is the LEFT here using religious bias to promote an antiscientific standard and allowing the State to violate Rights.

The Liberals and CJJR should be ashamed.

Another good thread here.

A consistent standard would have passed constitutional muster.
(1/6) I've been reading through the account of @LeftwingGc & their opinion that American radfems need to reject groups like WoLF which ally with right-wing organizations. I understand their concern that it could lead to us winning single-sex spaces and losing women's rights. ➡️


(2/6) I'm a lifelong liberal Democrat. I want to believe those who say that American feminists don't need alliances with the right, but the evidence so far doesn't support it.

We are losing on every front. Every court case that transactivists bring takes another chunk out➡️

(3/6) of women's sex-based protections & girls' futures.

With the ACLU on their side and the Democrats having gone so far left that they've traveled up the other side of the ideological horseshoe w/o realizing it, we're as outgunned as a kid waving a water pistol at a tank.➡️

(4/6) If there's a plan to get back what we've lost and reverse the tide while holding fast to our leftwing status, I want to hear it. But I haven't.

And what I do hear sounds awfully familiar: I've seen most of it over the last couple of years from certain British academic➡️

(5/6) feminists - women who have, not entirely without cause, been accused of snobbery and purity politics by many of the people who worked to bring about the recent string of UK successes against gender extremism.

Radical feminists in the US are a scattered group, dwindling➡️