7 days 30 days All time Recent Popular
(1/6) I've been reading through the account of @LeftwingGc & their opinion that American radfems need to reject groups like WoLF which ally with right-wing organizations. I understand their concern that it could lead to us winning single-sex spaces and losing women's rights. ➡️


(2/6) I'm a lifelong liberal Democrat. I want to believe those who say that American feminists don't need alliances with the right, but the evidence so far doesn't support it.

We are losing on every front. Every court case that transactivists bring takes another chunk out➡️

(3/6) of women's sex-based protections & girls' futures.

With the ACLU on their side and the Democrats having gone so far left that they've traveled up the other side of the ideological horseshoe w/o realizing it, we're as outgunned as a kid waving a water pistol at a tank.➡️

(4/6) If there's a plan to get back what we've lost and reverse the tide while holding fast to our leftwing status, I want to hear it. But I haven't.

And what I do hear sounds awfully familiar: I've seen most of it over the last couple of years from certain British academic➡️

(5/6) feminists - women who have, not entirely without cause, been accused of snobbery and purity politics by many of the people who worked to bring about the recent string of UK successes against gender extremism.

Radical feminists in the US are a scattered group, dwindling➡️
The West keeps repeating the same mistake again and again since the Soviets disintegrated 1991. We think that negotiating with gangsters can make them better people. It´s not money-driven behaviour. It´s about breaking moral tabus. This is what it takes to become a real gangster.


This is what Pennyworth in Dark Knight says: "Some guys just want to watch the world burn." There is an empty place in them, where other people have dignity. In order to make this place less itchy, they want to burn down all the different civilizations and people.

3/3 This is the "Dark Arousal" I describe in my second book "Feed the Demons": As a fallen angel, you need to make the Earth to hell. This is the only way how to get back your dignity. Money is just the upper layer. We deeply misunderstood #Russia. @MagdaVasaryova @anneapplebaum

Compile please
While I’m surprised to see someone who slapped his name on a Chicago skyscraper say ‘Illinois has no place to go,’ I want to offer @realDonaldTrump five exciting places to go in the great state of Illinois.


First thing's first, enjoy a Chicago classic at the one and only @TheWienerCircle. They have real hot dogs and real talk — all for the price of one.


If you want to get out of town, take the @Amtrak from Union Station all the way to Quincy, Alton or Carbondale. You might even run into @JoeBiden, who actually rides @Amtrak.

Things don’t seem to be going your way so you may need to scream into a canyon, Starved Rock State Park has more than 13 miles of trail that are open all year long. https://t.co/EaSIggAqjB


Looking for what real presidential leadership looks like? Visit our capital city of Springfield to see Honest Abe’s home, an adjective that will never be used to describe you.
He wouldn't be the first to follow along that path. Eric Goldman was seen as Dad's successor as WH professor-in-residence; @JeffShesol joined Clinton's staff after his book on RFK & LBJ caught the president's eye.


Meacham would also follow an even richer history of former journalists writing for presidents. Raymond Moley wrote for FDR even as he edited the magazine that became Newsweek (which Meacham himself later led). 2/

FDR's call for "bold persistent experimentation" came from a reporter's writing a speech for him in 1932 basically on a dare. 3/

Emmet Hughes helped Eisenhower while still a Time/Life employee. 4/

Ray Price and Pat Buchanan both came from newspaper backgrounds, as editorial writers. 5/
Scientifically, there should be a single consistent standard.

As long as that is true, it's fine.

Cuomo's standard was neither consistent nor scientific. That is a clear first amendment violation.


Gorsuch is SCIENTIFICALLY RIGHT HERE.

If people can't admit that, then they are allowing their biases to


This on the other hand is 100% BS.

Not a single scientist I know supports this double standard. The best ones know that the type ofvenue is irrelevant... Only the size and # of people


In short, it is the LEFT here using religious bias to promote an antiscientific standard and allowing the State to violate Rights.

The Liberals and CJJR should be ashamed.

Another good thread here.

A consistent standard would have passed constitutional muster.