Categories Society
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
The phrase that popped into my head was: we raised an army to fight nothing
And when I say "we" I mean white Christian patriarchal American culture. The same kind of martial "manhood" culture that Kristen Kobes du Mez talks about in Jesus and John Wayne.
In that book she's talking about the specifically evangelical version of the culture, but one of the things that's happened there, is that mainstream patriarchal culture is often pretty much identical to evangelical patriarchal culture with the serial numbers (slightly) filed off
But that book helped clarify what the leaders of that movement thought they were doing, and they thought they were raising warriors, men who would fight for God and Country (& the honor of pure womanhood) in the coming war.
WHAT coming war? Never mind. THE war. You know.
THE war is against communism, or against terrorists, or against Muslims, or against Foreign Devils of Unspecified Origin.
It's against Urban Violence and Liberal Traitors and Lizard People, the apocalyptic fighting in the street which is surely coming.
I don't know how you look at what's happening in DC and not immediately understand white male rage as a national threat https://t.co/HKrUPhexn3
— Jessica Valenti (@JessicaValenti) January 6, 2021
And when I say "we" I mean white Christian patriarchal American culture. The same kind of martial "manhood" culture that Kristen Kobes du Mez talks about in Jesus and John Wayne.
In that book she's talking about the specifically evangelical version of the culture, but one of the things that's happened there, is that mainstream patriarchal culture is often pretty much identical to evangelical patriarchal culture with the serial numbers (slightly) filed off
But that book helped clarify what the leaders of that movement thought they were doing, and they thought they were raising warriors, men who would fight for God and Country (& the honor of pure womanhood) in the coming war.
WHAT coming war? Never mind. THE war. You know.
THE war is against communism, or against terrorists, or against Muslims, or against Foreign Devils of Unspecified Origin.
It's against Urban Violence and Liberal Traitors and Lizard People, the apocalyptic fighting in the street which is surely coming.
At this point, the countries with most genomic data to analyze spread of the variant virus belonging to https://t.co/ImaHU6Jxdv B.1.1.7 lineage or @nextstrain clade 20I/501Y.V1 are the UK, Denmark and the USA. Here I compare growth rates of B.1.17 across these countries. 1/13
Working from @GISAID data, the UK has 18776 genomes, Denmark has 6089 genomes and the USA has 3093 genomes from specimens collected after Dec 15, 2020. Here, I'm looking at daily genomes with collection dates up to Jan 6 that were not pre-screened by "S dropout". 2/13
For the UK, we can see a steady increase in the frequency of sequenced variant viruses belonging to the B.1.1.7 lineage, reaching ~70% frequency at the end of December. Solid line is a 7 day sliding window average. 3/13
We can fit a logistic growth model to the frequency of B.1.1.7 in the UK data to estimate the rate of frequency increase through time. 4/13
And following @erikmvolz et al (https://t.co/l2ElhJVk8b) we can convert from a measured frequency growth rate to an estimate of increased transmissibility by assuming a particular generation time, which I take to be between 5 days and 6.5 days. 5/13
Working from @GISAID data, the UK has 18776 genomes, Denmark has 6089 genomes and the USA has 3093 genomes from specimens collected after Dec 15, 2020. Here, I'm looking at daily genomes with collection dates up to Jan 6 that were not pre-screened by "S dropout". 2/13
For the UK, we can see a steady increase in the frequency of sequenced variant viruses belonging to the B.1.1.7 lineage, reaching ~70% frequency at the end of December. Solid line is a 7 day sliding window average. 3/13
We can fit a logistic growth model to the frequency of B.1.1.7 in the UK data to estimate the rate of frequency increase through time. 4/13
And following @erikmvolz et al (https://t.co/l2ElhJVk8b) we can convert from a measured frequency growth rate to an estimate of increased transmissibility by assuming a particular generation time, which I take to be between 5 days and 6.5 days. 5/13
Hi @eiaine, since you quoted me in your op-ed (“Why do we demand democracy from our government, then cede our individual power in our workplaces?”) before going on to misrepresent & misunderstand labor tactics & @AlphabetWorkers, I'll be replying in this thread 🧵:
1) "There’s an easy solution to that problem — go work somewhere else" - this suggestion is akin to right wing fascists telling dissidents to just leave when we disagree w their governance. Deciding to stay and be a positive change is CRUCIAL when a company like
Google is in all of our back-pockets-- literally. If every ethicist and conscientious objector simply leaves, the gross impact of this corporation is in a much worse place for all of, something that should trouble every Google user.
2) Claiming that full-timers fear losing our jobs to "cheap contractor labor" and noting "many temp workers put in the same hours as full-time employees, but with none of the insurance, benefits or worker protections" proves one of the reasons that contractor
solidarity is so important to the tech labor movement-- no one's labor should be arbitrarily devalued. @AlphabetWorkers is committed to fighting for fair treatment of contractors bc it's the right thing to do. Implying selfish motivations with no basis is petty & divisive.
Most unions aim to deliver benefits to members, even at cost to society. The new one at Google aims to charge members to deliver benefits to society. Let's see how far that goes (via @bopinion) https://t.co/fswlwP2j28
— Bloomberg Economics (@economics) January 8, 2021
1) "There’s an easy solution to that problem — go work somewhere else" - this suggestion is akin to right wing fascists telling dissidents to just leave when we disagree w their governance. Deciding to stay and be a positive change is CRUCIAL when a company like
Google is in all of our back-pockets-- literally. If every ethicist and conscientious objector simply leaves, the gross impact of this corporation is in a much worse place for all of, something that should trouble every Google user.
2) Claiming that full-timers fear losing our jobs to "cheap contractor labor" and noting "many temp workers put in the same hours as full-time employees, but with none of the insurance, benefits or worker protections" proves one of the reasons that contractor
solidarity is so important to the tech labor movement-- no one's labor should be arbitrarily devalued. @AlphabetWorkers is committed to fighting for fair treatment of contractors bc it's the right thing to do. Implying selfish motivations with no basis is petty & divisive.
I have distracted myself this week with the extraordinarily mundane task of designing a sample identifier scheme. I want to share some decisions I made in the hope that it saves somebody else some time.
The first choice was the alphabet. I wanted to use human friendly, familiar ASCII characters, but intentionally leave out potentially confusing characters. I'd previously read about "Crockford's base32" (https://t.co/xa3WREc1RQ) which tries to address this problem.
But my search led me instead to z-base32 (https://t.co/5PlTgAgyDU). The z-base32 alphabet is shuffled to try and make encoded identifiers easier to discern. I don't actually need the encoding, but I liked the idea that this shuffle makes sequential identifiers less sequential.
z-base32 takes the interesting choice of using the letters in lowercase to help identifiers form "coastlines" that aid with human recognition. The lab quickly fed back they didn't like this, so I force the alphabet back to uppercase.
With the alphabet decided, I wanted to pick a checking scheme. I learned that each algorithm catches different types of errors, so one needs some knowledge of how the identifiers will be used when making a decision.
The first choice was the alphabet. I wanted to use human friendly, familiar ASCII characters, but intentionally leave out potentially confusing characters. I'd previously read about "Crockford's base32" (https://t.co/xa3WREc1RQ) which tries to address this problem.
But my search led me instead to z-base32 (https://t.co/5PlTgAgyDU). The z-base32 alphabet is shuffled to try and make encoded identifiers easier to discern. I don't actually need the encoding, but I liked the idea that this shuffle makes sequential identifiers less sequential.
z-base32 takes the interesting choice of using the letters in lowercase to help identifiers form "coastlines" that aid with human recognition. The lab quickly fed back they didn't like this, so I force the alphabet back to uppercase.
With the alphabet decided, I wanted to pick a checking scheme. I learned that each algorithm catches different types of errors, so one needs some knowledge of how the identifiers will be used when making a decision.
New preprint, “Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions for Suicide Prevention: Promise, Challenges, and Future Directions” with @walthdempsey, Evan Kleiman, @drkatebentley, @SusanMurphylab1, and @mk_nock! https://t.co/QeMh22Dvu9
First we highlight three hindrances to treatment efficacy for suicidal thoughts and behaviors:
-Frequency
-Accessibility
-Content
Most existing interventions are infrequent, not accessible when most needed, and not systematically tailored to the person using their own data.
Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) are a potential solution to these hindrances to treatment efficacy. JITAIs are designed to provide the right type of support at the right time by adapting to changes in internal states and external contexts
Components of JITAIs include:
-Decision points
-Intervention options
-Tailoring variables
-Decision rules
-Proximal outcomes
-Distal outcomes
Image from (https://t.co/7OGzELv8HL)
We provide an example of a JITAI and Micro-randomized Trial (https://t.co/dbQIWHO0dU) for suicide prevention. This intervention would specifically be targeting social support based on our previous work (https://t.co/e53j9VVE1u).
First we highlight three hindrances to treatment efficacy for suicidal thoughts and behaviors:
-Frequency
-Accessibility
-Content
Most existing interventions are infrequent, not accessible when most needed, and not systematically tailored to the person using their own data.
Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) are a potential solution to these hindrances to treatment efficacy. JITAIs are designed to provide the right type of support at the right time by adapting to changes in internal states and external contexts
Components of JITAIs include:
-Decision points
-Intervention options
-Tailoring variables
-Decision rules
-Proximal outcomes
-Distal outcomes
Image from (https://t.co/7OGzELv8HL)
We provide an example of a JITAI and Micro-randomized Trial (https://t.co/dbQIWHO0dU) for suicide prevention. This intervention would specifically be targeting social support based on our previous work (https://t.co/e53j9VVE1u).
But you couldn't pay for the Jobs I did for you.
Celebrities and this public showcasing of being nice.
You and your brand are evil!
I know this might not even blow up cos I have very little followers but I will just call on few sensible people I've noticed on here @SMiTHiE___ @Shawnifee @SavvyRinu. Your retweets would go a long way into creating awareness of hoe some of these so called celebrities are evil.
August last year, I messaged Lilo on Twitter here trying to secure a graphic designer Job on her team cos I really saw she lacked that and needed one. Fastfoward, she replied and told me to send my portfolio to her mail which I did.
I knew she was going to be really busy...
Cos it was just like few weeks after she left the house. She responded after a week or so and I started talking to someone on her team and she told me they'd just want to try me cos they have so many other people trying to secure that position on the team so they gave me a test..
They told me to make a design of a brand she's working on launching which I did and Lilo really liked it and approved it.
I was really excited as I'm just a student and just trying to make money for myself, I put into so much effort designing just trying to secure a spot....
Celebrities and this public showcasing of being nice.
You and your brand are evil!
Order it! I\u2019ll pay for you.
— Lilo Aderogba \U0001f33a\U0001f33a\U0001f33a (@Liloaderogba) January 6, 2021
Happy new year \U0001f33a \U0001f495 https://t.co/811ncG9ebY
I know this might not even blow up cos I have very little followers but I will just call on few sensible people I've noticed on here @SMiTHiE___ @Shawnifee @SavvyRinu. Your retweets would go a long way into creating awareness of hoe some of these so called celebrities are evil.
August last year, I messaged Lilo on Twitter here trying to secure a graphic designer Job on her team cos I really saw she lacked that and needed one. Fastfoward, she replied and told me to send my portfolio to her mail which I did.
I knew she was going to be really busy...
Cos it was just like few weeks after she left the house. She responded after a week or so and I started talking to someone on her team and she told me they'd just want to try me cos they have so many other people trying to secure that position on the team so they gave me a test..
They told me to make a design of a brand she's working on launching which I did and Lilo really liked it and approved it.
I was really excited as I'm just a student and just trying to make money for myself, I put into so much effort designing just trying to secure a spot....