BC SCIENCE
Saved by @Mollyycolllinss

https://t.co/odzm9VTdwZ

Thread for today. /0

 It is fashionable for people to create sympathy to the unseen / unknown organisms. The poor things that can't stand up and fight for their own existence.

It makes for a brilliant narrative. It melts your hearts. And you get to play saviour of the oppressed by outraging. /1
But, for most part, such things are also false.

Amazon are the lungs of the world. Never mind that most of the world's oxygen production happens in open oceans. But these are harmless ones. Of course, we all love to maintain forests.
However, some things are sheer scare mongering.

For instance - take this: coral reefs will be permanently gone if mean / median temperatures raise by 1°C ..

But, really - how? Then you get a lecture on how CO2 will affect calcification.

Dig a bit deeper from another angle+
+ and you find that the earth was much much warmer during the age of Dinosaurs. So much so, that we had cold blooded lizards growing to sizes of buildings. Surely, there must have been tons of CO2 then!

And the ocean temps were quite high too.
How do we know corals survived it? Wasn't that a long time ago?

Here is the catch - Corals have been in existence for the last one billion years (or more).
No one asks, why would this 1° raise kill corals if the much warmer Triassic temps didn't?

Second one are news like the one quoted above. (Shark eggs are unviable **due to global warming**).

This is a false flag. Is there a correlation between these two? Maybe.
Is there a proven cause effect? It is almost impossible to do. While one can argue the reverse is also valid: that one can't disprove this isn't due to temperature, we can derive lessons from other strands of nature.

Intriguing and relevant are lessons from the fruit fly!
The fruit fly is a good system for drawing some inferences and ask the same questions of other systems. Like sharks or corals.
In 2010, Frankel et al published an excellent paper

https://t.co/8Q9ARW5iV5

Some background: information in DNA is controlled by short segments of DNA called enhancers. In 2010, Frankel et al found a particular enhancer that seemed redundant.
The function regulated by this family of enhancers was embryo development. That is the growth of the fly from its egg.

They deleted this "redundant" copy of the enhancer, and saw that it had zero impact on development. But then - when they deleted it and ++
++ grew the eggs in elevated temperatures, the eggs didn't develop into full live insects.

That is, this seemingly redundant enhancer was a contingency plan put in place by nature to deal with unforeseen events.

It is entirely coincidental that the best example to ++
++ describe contingency plans in living systems also involves survival in increased temperature.

Now we can at least use these lessons to ask questions about Sharks and corals!

If Drosophila, a relatively recent organism, can have contingency plans - won't the sharks have it?
Sharks have been around since before bony fishes. they have been around for 450 million years. They have seen the landmass become Pangaea, and then split again. And yet, we are to believe that sharks haven't witnessed / survived global temperature changes.
If sharks have it - logically they should - why won't the corals have it?

Remember - the entire argument isn't about whether or not warming occurs .. but it is about whether the scaremongering holds water.

If we have understood something about life, it is that it survives.
But then, does it mean there won't be any impact?

No. That is not the message. It is that the lower an organism is on the evolutionary scale, the lesser it will be hit.

Someone mentioned polar Bears. They will be hit. They are complex organisms with specific habitat reqs.
So, naturally - that organism which is most fastidious about its habitat, will be the most hit with climate change?

Guess the most fastidious numerous animal? Humans.

Climate change - irrespective of the cause, is seen to affect glaciers. No amount of wishing away changes it.
Humans will be the hardest hit - especially in zones where they are concentrated with depleting fresh water and forest cover (we come to rain forests again).

The complex web of life means that the over exploitation is the problem. So what is the way ahead?
Spoiler alert: short of cutting down human population by 90%, there is no solution.

All the measures (green tech) is just band aid on a open surgical wound. You can assuage your heart .. but it won't stop.

Take the example of China. ~1.25B people.
Think about it: China is a growing economy that wants to become a first world country in a hurry. It has 1.25B people.

What does it mean to be a first world country? Typically two things: food + water surplus, energy surplus.

What did China do to address these problems?
It trawled the oceans! And how?

https://t.co/2MkOv6O6CG

And they have been doing it for almost two decades now.

What the white man did to American Bison, Chinese are doing to the oceans. In a far larger scale.
As for water, we know their dam building activities. To think dams don't affect life forms is naive, so I will leave that there.

Last is Energy: China gets as much as 60% of its total energy from burning coal.

Energy is the currency of civilization.
And what we discussed is just one 1/6th of the global population. India is trying to climb the same ladder.

Everyone wants AC to protect them from the summer. Everyone wants a car. Everyone wants fresh water and food.

Nope. Global warming isn't going anywhere.
Then the argument is "don't have kids. Save the world". This is as foolish an argument as any. Having one child who would take the fight to save the world to the next generation, outweighs leaving the world to those who don't think it needs saving.

Politically incorrect.
What then is the solution? Likely, none for the next 200yr (short of a catastrophe).

For now, understand that anyone promising to do this within the next 30yrs is bullshitting.

Why? After India, it will be the turn of entire African continent to become energy and food surplus.
So, the only hope for the world is to become energy rich as soon as possible - and built technologically protected enclaves to save as many species as possible -- while keeping the population growth rate slightly negative and let it fall to sustainable levels.
Don't be anti technology. Organic sounds good. But GMO that produces twice as much food for the same resources, is much better. Don't shy away from incrementalism. Don't shy away from talking the stark truth: we will have to exploit nature to keep humans alive.
If you have to exploit the oceans to give humans food and water, you have to do it. Else, someone who is willing to do that will come to power. You won't like it, but you won't have a choice either.

Like all things humans - civilizational values are key in resolving this issue.
And with that we come to this last point. Not all civilizations are made equal. Some have values that are inherently better suited to sustainable living and existence than others.

Pick your value systems carefully.
Last but not least, and circling around to where we started: it is easy to tug at the nice part of your heart. It is difficult to reconcile the harsh realities with what we want it to be. Don't give into rhetoric of revolutionary changes and fast solutions. They are ruinous.
End of rant: don't take it at face value just because a scientist says so. Measure everything up against reality. You will see that most scientists are just cocooned IYIs. It takes wisdom to solve problems. // Fin.

More from Science

Eric Holthaus
Eric Holthaus
@EricHolthaus
JUST IN: The U.S. National Climate Assessment is now public.

This is the report that the Trump Administration doesn’t want you to see. Years in the making, released on the day after Thanksgiving. #ClimateFriday

Here are some of the main

This report is mandated by Congress and focused on the impacts of climate change in the U.S.

Basically: This is what our best scientists think will happen to us as a result of the actions our government is (not) taking to address the most important problem in human history.
/2

300 experts in 13 federal agencies volunteered their time to make sure you have this information.

Please share it widely.
/3

The top finding:

“Climate change is projected to significantly affect human health, the economy, and the environment in the United

To expand on that finding:

“In the absence of more significant global mitigation efforts, climate change is projected to impose substantial damages on the U.S. economy, human health, and the environment. ...”
/5
SCIENCE
10-K Diver
10-K Diver
@10kdiver
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll help you understand the basics of Binomial Thinking.

The future is always uncertain. There are many different ways it can unfold -- some more likely than others. Binomial thinking helps us embrace this view.


2/

The S&P 500 index is at ~3768 today.

Suppose we want to predict where it will be 10 years from now.

Historically, we know that this index has returned ~10% per year.

If we simply extrapolate this, we get an estimate of ~9773 for the index 10 years from now:


3/

What we just did is called a "point estimate" -- a prediction about the future that's a single number (9773).

But of course, we know the future is uncertain. It's impossible to predict it so precisely.

So, there's a sense of *false precision* in point estimates like this.

4/

To emphasize the uncertainty inherent in such predictions, a better approach is to predict a *range* of values rather than a single number.

For example, we may say the index will return somewhere in the *range* of 8% to 12% (instead of a fixed 10%) per year.

5/

10 years from now, this implies an index value in the *range* [8135, 11703]:
SCIENCE
Advertisement
Lea Kissner
Lea Kissner
@LeaKissner
Next up at #enigma2021, Sanghyun Hong will be speaking about "A SOUND MIND IN A VULNERABLE BODY: PRACTICAL HARDWARE ATTACKS ON DEEP LEARNING"

(Hint: speaker is on the

In recent years ML models have worked from research labs to production, which makes ML security important. Adversarial ML research studies how to mess with ML

For example by messing with the training data (c.f. Tay which became super-racist super-fast) or by foiling ML models by changing inputs in ways humans can't see.


Prior work considers ML models in a standalone, mathematical way
* looks at the robustness in an isolated manner
* doesn't look at the whole ecosystem and how the model is used -- ML models are running in real hardware with real software which has real vulns!


This talk focuses on hardware-level vulnerabilities. This is particularly interesting because these can break cryptographic guarantees (because those are outside of their threat models)
e.g. fault injection attacks, side-channel attacks
SCIENCE
Eric Feigl-Ding
Eric Feigl-Ding
@DrEricDing
JUST ONE PERSON—UK 🇬🇧 scientists think one immunocompromised person who cleared virus slowly & only partially wiped out an infection, leaving behind genetically-hardier viruses that rebound & learn how to survive better. That’s likely how #B117 started. 🧵 https://t.co/bMMjM8Hiuz


2) The leading hypothesis is that the new variant evolved within just one person, chronically infected with the virus for so long it was able to evolve into a new, more infectious form.

same thing happened in Boston in another immunocompromised person that was sick for 155 days.

3) What happened in Boston with one 45 year old man who was highly infectious for 155 days straight before he died... is exactly what scientists think happened in Kent, England that gave rise to #B117.


4) Doctors were shocked to find virus has evolved many different forms inside of this one immunocompromised man. 20 new mutations in one virus, akin to the #B117. This is possibly how #B1351 in South Africa 🇿🇦 and #P1 in Brazil 🇧🇷 also evolved.


5) “On its own, the appearance of a new variant in genomic databases doesn’t tell us much. “That’s just one genome amongst thousands every week. It wouldn’t necessarily stick out,” says Oliver Pybus, a professor of evolution and infectious disease at Oxford.
SCIENCE
Michael Nielsen
Michael Nielsen
@michael_nielsen
What are the classics of the "Science of Science" or "Meta Science"? If you were teaching a class on the subject, what would go in the syllabus?

Here's a (very disorganized and incomplete) handful of suggestions, which I may add to. Suggestions welcome, especially if you've dug into relevant literatures.

1. The already classic "Estimating the reproducibility of
psychological science" from the Open Science Collaboration of @BrianNosek et al. https://t.co/yjGczLZ6Je

(Look at that abstract, wow!)


Many people had pointed out problems with standard statistical methods, going back decades (what are the best refs?). But this paper was a sledgehammer, making it impossible to ignore the question: what, if anything, were we actually learning from all those statistical studies?

2. Dean Keith Simonton's book "Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist". If an essentially scientometric book could be described as a fun romp through science & creativity, this would be it
SCIENCE

You May Also Like

Tom Hirst
Tom Hirst
@tom_hirst
How to create a freelancing website that makes money.

Everything I've learned.

A thread.

As a freelancer,

Your website is everything.

First, prioritise its existence.

Second, prioritise its improvement.

The technology you use is irrelevant.

- WordPress
- Notion
- Carrd
- Wix

It doesn't matter which you choose,

What matters is you have a website.

Pick a platform that you're comfortable with.

If you can:

- Capture leads
- Add content easily
- Have a clear design

You're good.

If your website doesn't get leads,

It's not working.

Don't rest on a website that doesn't work for you.

Improve it until it does.
STARTUPS
Patrick Chovanec
Patrick Chovanec
@prchovanec
I'm going to do two history threads on Ethiopia, one on its ancient history, one on its modern story (1800 to today). 🇪🇹

I'll begin with the ancient history ... and it goes way back. Because modern humans - and before that, the ancestors of humans - almost certainly originated in Ethiopia. 🇪🇹 (sub-thread):


The first likely historical reference to Ethiopia is ancient Egyptian records of trade expeditions to the "Land of Punt" in search of gold, ebony, ivory, incense, and wild animals, starting in c 2500 BC 🇪🇹


Ethiopians themselves believe that the Queen of Sheba, who visited Israel's King Solomon in the Bible (c 950 BC), came from Ethiopia (not Yemen, as others believe). Here she is meeting Solomon in a stain-glassed window in Addis Ababa's Holy Trinity Church. 🇪🇹


References to the Queen of Sheba are everywhere in Ethiopia. The national airline's frequent flier miles are even called "ShebaMiles". 🇪🇹
CULTURE
Advertisement
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson
@mijustin
A lot of bootstrappers think they have a marketing problem:

"I need to get better at marketing."

But, it's more likely that you have a product problem:

"Do customers really want this? Do they care enough about this to switch to a new solution?"

☝️ this is why most of my book, @marketingdevs, is about:

1. Choosing the right market
2. Building something they want

"If your product is remarkable, getting noticed is a lot easier." – @peldi


I was reminded of this concept again this morning while reading @pjrvs' book (Company of One):

"Sales increase when you honestly evaluate what someone needs and then teach them the value of what you're selling."


To succeed, your product has to offer an outcome that is highly desirable to a large group of customers.

The number of sales your product receives is a multiple of these two variables:

1. How big is the target market?
2. How desirable is the outcome you're offering them?
STARTUPS
Adam McKay
Adam McKay
@GhostPanther
1) My Stan Lee story happened when I was in 5th grade. I was visiting NYC with my Dad and had read the address for Marvel in the comics I read constantly. I begged my Dad to take me and to his credit he did. And guess what? It was just an office.

2) We were down in the lobby and I was kind of crushed. I don’t know what I expected, The Thing and the Yancy Street Gang to be sitting around smoking cigars? Anyway, my Dad was taking a beat to figure where we were going next and a guy came up to us.

3) He was wearing a white shirt and tie and said to Dad “Is he disappointed because. The Marvel offices were just offices?” My Dad said yes and then the guy who had gray around his temples and a mustache said “hold on a second” and opened one of those office mailboxes with a key.

4) He then handed me a thick stack of EVERY SINGLE MARVEL COMIC COMING OUT THE NEXT MONTH. “Here you go. Keep reading Marvel comics” he said and then walked off. I left in a daze and about 15 minutes later it hit me “Gray around the temples, mustache... That was Stan Lee!”

5) Later when I wrote on the Ant Man movie I told Kevin Feige the story, the year, look of the guy etc and Kevin said “That’s exactly the kind of thing Stan would do and he would have been there then. That was him.” Rest In Peace Stan Lee and thank you for the comics.
CULTURE
Stephen Fasenfeld \U0001f600
Stephen Fasenfeld 😀...
@fasenfeld
1. “Who Are Ireland’s Members Of The World Economic Forum Implementing The Great Reset In 2021 ? 🧵1/28

🕵️🔎 Politicians, Musicians, Clergy, Bankers, Journalists, Human Rights, Artificial Intelligence, Sustainability, Corporations & Agriculture


2. In previous threads I have looked at 🇮🇪 key players in the Trilateral Commission as well as 🇮🇪 people who have attended the Bilderberger meetings. I also looked at the 🇮🇪 in the Young Global Leaders which is a site run by the WEF. You will see a lot of crossover between them.

3. The purpose of this thread is to compile all the Irish members into one thread for ease of access and reading rather than having to dive through the WEF site. This is by no means definitive and I will be adding more over time when they pop out of the woodwork.

4. Ireland’s WEF members are drawn from all walks of life but can be split into 2 separate areas. The WEF calls the first category “people” and the 2nd one “agenda contributors”. In total Ireland has a minimum of 61 members. Some of the names will be familiar and others will not

5. In this thread I’m just going to concentrate on the 21 people (there are probably a lot more). There are also 40 “agenda contributors” which I will cover in a separate thread. The agenda contributors are those who write articles or do research for the WEF site.
ECONOMY