Folks asked about my reverse outline process so here's a thread..
Simple concept, go through each substantive chapter & log the topic of each paragraph in one line. I do this by hand on a legal pad, so the description has to be super brief. 1/
#SocAF #PhDChat #AcademicChatter

As I go, I write out the subheadings within the chapter with the title & a brief description of the content there (few words). I also note how many paragraphs of "set-up" are at the start of each chapter. 2/
For each paragraph, if it contains empirical data, I make a note of the case/example/quote..still only on a single line. This is indented under the paragraph topic line. For these lines, I wrote 'data' in the margin to flag where empirical data were included. 3/
I use post-it strips to flag things that I think of as I go...cite X or include Y example here or this needs to be fleshed out. 4/
Initially, this outline allows me to see where I'm light on data, when the set-up of sections isn't parallel (e.g. 3 paragraphs for one chapter and 5 for another), where I can include better examples, where my paragraphs are redundant or don't flow well one to the next. 5/
Now that this is done, I will cut the one line descriptions individually & do some visual mapping on a dry erase board, literally moving paragraphs or examples around, inserting new examples, or flagging where a new paragraph would go with a highlighted strip. 6/
I made two copies of the complete outline, so that I can use the original in that form, have one to cut, and one to copy again if needed/to cut paragraph strips from if they get loss/damaged. 7/
I learned the cutting & moving tip from my dissertation chair and am excited to use it for my book manuscript, as he's used it for his books. 8/
But the reverse outlining thing is also useful for article manuscripts. It allows you to much more easily see the whole paper - where reorganization is necessary, if the argument flows, what's redundant. 9/
Here's what the outline looks like. This is one subsection from one chapter. 10/
Here's the cutting part (excuse the sewing cutting board, my dry erase board is on the way). I move as necessary...reordering, moving to a new subsection or chapter, adding "strips" or deleting them entirely. I'll cut the data strips away from the topic strips if needed. 11/
I have a bunch of teeny magnets to hold the strips on the board. Then the moving begins. I'll use post-its or write directly on the board things that need to be addressed. 12/
I'll start doing one chapter at a time and then will zoom out to a couple at once, then finally having all 5 up there. I'll do the intro and conclusion once the substantive chapters are super tight. 13/
I highly recommend doing this by hand..I've tried on the computer, and not the same result. Only having one line really makes you parse down what the paragraph is about. If you can't do it in one line, there might be too much going on in the paragraph. 14/
It also allows you to handle the text which I think there is something to be said for...it's why I do my qualitative coding by hand. Maybe it's "not real," but it makes a difference for at least some folks. 15/
Try to do the entire outline in one sitting/day/as close together as possible. Seeing the entire thing at a single time makes a difference. Things jumped out at me that I'd just read 2 chapters ago. It's easier to see connections/redundancies. 16/
Color coding is useful also..once I start the next phase, I'm going to highlight different types of data/quotes from particular individuals in different colors. I'll easily see if there's too much from one person, or not enough examples from x type of hearing. 17/
Hope this is useful! Happy writing! 18/18

More from Science

Epic thread incoming:

I'm going to answer the question so many people have been asking this week:

WHAT IS PROJECT X???

Here's the definitive thread to tell you - and show you -precisely what Project X is

Grab a drink, sit down with me and let's #TalkLiberation

<3

1/?

"Project X" is actually called "PanQuake".

Pan means "all". Quake is the huge effect our voices can have when our communications are uncensored and when we have access to brand new functionality that *enhances* our social reach, rather than diminishes it

Here's our logo:

2/?


You can follow the fledgling official PanQuake Twitter account here: @pan_quake and see our super cool new website here:
https://t.co/F7wLSeM6aK

You can find our donation page here: https://t.co/VICFnsR0RX

Keep reading this thread to find out why we created it & what it is

3/?

SPOILER ALERT: Much of the content below this point is from my personal slides & speech notes from today's launch event. That stream got totally ruined by (big) tech problems, but I'm happy to report everything is turning out wonderfully


Here are some of our most high profile & dedicated public advocates for PanQuake - many of whom were scheduled to appear at our launch. All of whom stuck around for hours, to do a prerecord of the event, which is being edited, processed & uploaded for you as I write this.

5/?

You May Also Like

@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.