"The new answer to a 77-year-old problem"

😭

https://t.co/hm9NoaU4nr
https://t.co/8fKDiKjSWc
https://t.co/jkaicC1F2x
https://t.co/PpxWT4Jef4
https://t.co/cGQyg9kuOA
https://t.co/2wwPQa8CQ5
https://t.co/7yNW4KgCPi
You've come this far and you're thinking... oh... but plot the difference...

Ok. https://t.co/ifP2RNpLIn
Or this. https://t.co/gwF3u4BVGQ
I will say, box plots / dynamite plots are a terrible way to display data and too many people still use them. But people make a lot of poor choices in their figures. Since you've come this far I'll share this ultimate useless figure... enjoy Figure 1... https://t.co/qI1RUtK0Fn

More from Science

Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

https://t.co/mzS7vVSREJ

https://t.co/353PdAX2fa

https://t.co/3yBImjOdd4

In some cases, almost 100% of the light energy can be converted to the second harmonic frequency. These cases typically involve intense pulsed laser beams passing through large crystals, and careful alignment to obtain phase matching.
What are the classics of the "Science of Science" or "Meta Science"? If you were teaching a class on the subject, what would go in the syllabus?

Here's a (very disorganized and incomplete) handful of suggestions, which I may add to. Suggestions welcome, especially if you've dug into relevant literatures.

1. The already classic "Estimating the reproducibility of
psychological science" from the Open Science Collaboration of @BrianNosek et al.
https://t.co/yjGczLZ6Je

(Look at that abstract, wow!)


Many people had pointed out problems with standard statistical methods, going back decades (what are the best refs?). But this paper was a sledgehammer, making it impossible to ignore the question: what, if anything, were we actually learning from all those statistical studies?

2. Dean Keith Simonton's book "Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist". If an essentially scientometric book could be described as a fun romp through science & creativity, this would be it

You May Also Like