Have been bullish on #gold since $1786, Gold at $1910 today.
#investing
On crossing $1786, #Gold is moving to $1850 pic.twitter.com/PzmIv34nuC
— Kirtan A Shah (@KirtanShahCFP) April 20, 2021
More from Kirtan A Shah
Hit the 're-tweet' and help us educated more investors
Yes Bank’s additional Tier 1 bonds, written off. Lakshmi Villas Banks Tier 2 bonds, written off. Understand what & why of ATI and Tier 2 bonds in this thread.
https://t.co/VBmV2dwpPn (1/n)
Yes Bank\u2019s additional Tier 1 bonds, written off. Lakshmi Villas Banks Tier 2 bonds, written off. Understand what & why of ATI and Tier 2 bonds in this thread.
— Kirtan A Shah (@KirtanShahCFP) December 4, 2020
Do \u2018re-tweet\u2019 and help us benefit more investors (1/n)
'Floating Rate Funds' - A case for debt investing in the current interest rate situation
'Floating Rate Funds' - A case for debt investing in the current interest rate situation (A Thread)
— Kirtan A Shah (@KirtanShahCFP) November 27, 2020
You should not miss this if you invest in Debt.
Do \u2018re-tweet\u2019 & help us benefit more investors (1/n)
Fixed Income investment strategies
It’s a misconception that FD, RBI Bond, PPF etc have no risk. The reason we don’t see the risk in them is because for us, risk ONLY means loss of capital.
Fixed Income investment strategies (Thread)
— Kirtan A Shah (@KirtanShahCFP) November 20, 2020
Do 're-tweet' & help us reach & benefit investors
It\u2019s a misconception that FD, RBI Bond, PPF etc have no risk. The reason we don\u2019t see the risk in them is because for us, risk ONLY means loss of capital. (1/n)
Index Funds v/s ETFs
While index funds and ETF’s look similar, there are multiple differences you need to keep in mind before investing in either of them. Let me highlight the important ones
Index Funds v/s ETFs
— Kirtan A Shah (@KirtanShahCFP) November 17, 2020
Do 're-tweet' so that we can reach a larger audience :)
(Thread)
(1) While index funds and ETF\u2019s look similar, there are multiple differences you need to keep in mind before investing in either of them. Let me highlight the important ones (1/n)
More from Gold
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x