Categories For later read
Popping back on briefly to share some insights on media consumption, spread of conspiracy theories, & epistemelogical divides.
— hannah anderson (@sometimesalight) January 12, 2021
1. The increased burden of sifting fact from fiction is one that only the economically privileged have the bandwidth to keep up with day-to-day, especially w/the SPEED of news generation we've seen in the last 6-10 years. This contributes to polarization & significantly... 2/12
... disadvantages blue collar America (on the left and the right) in an info economy, and is a massive catalyst for populist sentiments that make it exponentially harder for already-weak institutions to lead or swim against the tide (see Yuval Levin's "A Time to Build"). 3/12
2. I cannot agree more effusively with @sometimesalight's point re: social media & narrative. Social media platforms function as counterfeit institutions (social spaces that form identity via narrative, connection via shared purpose, & virtue via participation). 4/12
Prior to SocMed's ubiquity(approx. 2010), sifting/weighing primarily happened in traditional institutions (esp. churches) where perspectives tempered by wisdom, virtue, & relationship both evaluated & prioritized info. They served as both refuge & filter, solvent & catalyst. 5/12
This is very important for people in leadership positions. \u201cHey, have a second?\u201d can send someone with anxiety into a world of panic. Did I mess something up? Am
— Seth Vargo (@sethvargo) January 23, 2021
I getting fired? Is my manager quitting? Is the company going under? https://t.co/AFltjJ0NNe
Once, long ago, my manager came to me on a Friday afternoon: "Are you going to be here on Monday?" 2/
Now, this is the 1990s: to work from home, you needed a modem (!!) -- and at the time, I owned no computer so even that wasn't happening. So I was emphatically going to be there on Monday, if for no other reason that I had nowhere else to work. 3/
"Yes, of course I'm going to be here on Monday."
"Okay, we need to talk Monday."
"Is there something wrong? Can we talk now?"
"Let's talk Monday." 4/
My early-twentysomething self was (obviously?) very anxious, so I immediately went to the office of the senior engineer in the group (and my mentor), Jeff Bonwick to see if he knew of anything that I might have screwed up... 5/
@cledocumenters
@NeighborUpCle
Join us and watch the Public Safet & Justice Affairs Committee meeting here,
The agenda for the meeting can be accessed here,
https://t.co/qV0kOQeinp

Here is a preview of the members attending.

Agenda item #1 a Call to Order has happened.
Note:
Agenda item #2 Roll call has happened.
Note: the Roll call has happened.
This piece by @ThatShockratees is the best thing you will read today.
— Greg Olear (@gregolear) December 15, 2020
We know Biden will replace Trump as President. We didn't know MVP Kamala can replace Mitch as presiding officer of the Senate.https://t.co/vSOlywz8Hn
The problem with that attack is encapsulated in the Senate's official history (cited graf 7) - https://t.co/UwF93b9YaA
The Senate's official history on its https://t.co/gLTPXi8eiT site recounts the Constitutional fact that the majority leader's presiding powers are derivative.
A power informally delegated by the VP can be taken back, so the Senate history accurately describes the majority leader as "an emperor without clothes." So, if the VP used presiding power to give priority to a senator moving a House-passed bill to the floor, and . . .
. . . the House purported to override that action by 1) self-recognizing the ML to do something different, and then 2) sustaining a point of order limiting the VP's presiding power, what would be the legal basis and remedy for that action?
Several principles intersect here that arise from agency rulemaking. But first, we have to recognize the Supremacy Clause - the Constitution is a superior law to any other law, rule or precedent.
So how does @xuenay do
5/ But I don't want to have to wait to share these models! I've already begun to share them with coaching clients, with great results.
— Matty G (@mattgoldenberg) January 7, 2021
So over the next few weeks, I want to do a few tweetstorms sharing the https://t.co/WlcYFIARFW models. I'll quote tweet them in this thread.
2/ Like with all of these models, this is inspired by interview @xuenay but not necessarily endorsed by him. There's a necessary translation process that goes from his head to my head to paper!
3/Let's first talk about beliefs and motivations. What's his primary motivation to start this process?
For him, it's a process of seeing people disagree, and feeling a visceral sense of frustration at people talking post each other.
5/ For him, it's almost a proprioceptive sense of two different shapes. One person is saying circle, and the other is hearing square. It's really important to make these shapes match up!
6/ There are two underlying values here. The less salient one is wanting a sense of admiration from others. It's really nice to get praise for creating good explanations that unify two viewpoints.
1. Blumenthal
Yesterday\u2019s insurrection was instigated & incited by President Trump. He is unfit to hold office for even one day longer.
— Richard Blumenthal (@SenBlumenthal) January 7, 2021
The 25th Amendment should be invoked &, if the VP & Cabinet refuse to act, Senate Republicans must join the House to impeach & remove Trump.
2.
Donald Trump has shown he is a direct threat to the safety and security of Americans and the integrity of our democracy. The Vice President & Cabinet should immediately invoke the 25th Amendment to remove the President from office.
— Cory Booker (@CoryBooker) January 7, 2021
3.
President Trump must be removed from office for inciting yesterday's violent insurrection.
— Sherrod Brown (@SenSherrodBrown) January 7, 2021
I am calling on the cabinet and vice president to immediately invoke the 25th Amendment. pic.twitter.com/tilP7y24jk
4.
I call on Vice President Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment and begin the process of removing the powers of the presidency from Donald Trump. This is the quickest way to protect our domestic and national security.
— Senator Bob Casey (@SenBobCasey) January 7, 2021