Categories Economy
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
Sir @LLinWood
You opened a portal
I went through a journey and this is what I found
I started looking for Italian luxury fashion industries
Connect with the way of Silk?
Story always repeated itself https://t.co/op65Y1OMtz
China slowly buying everything
Industries and part of banks power
With politicians signing agreements
And powerful industries in main sectors too
You opened a portal
I went through a journey and this is what I found
I started looking for Italian luxury fashion industries
Connect with the way of Silk?
Story always repeated itself https://t.co/op65Y1OMtz
Did you know that Chinese Communist Party owns THE Panama Canal?
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 13, 2020
Did you know that CCP built its own Suez Canal next to one built by America?
Do you know how much land CCP has purchased in Africa, South America & United States?
Wake up America.#FightBack
China slowly buying everything
Industries and part of banks power
With politicians signing agreements
And powerful industries in main sectors too
1/9. There are many problems with this rule. Pruitt/Wheeler threw out EPA's own established procedures to short-circuit the science review: changes to the review process since 2017 undermined its quality, credibility, and integrity.
2/9. Pruitt/Wheeler kicked all 7 members off the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, and replaced them under a policy found to be arbitrary and capricious by the U.S. district court of SDNY. The repopulated CASAC has the appearance of lack of impartiality.
3/9. Wheeler refused to form a CASAC Ozone Review Panel 3 months after EPA issued a call for nominations for such a panel, thereby depriving CASAC of the breadth, depth, and diversity of expertise, experience and perspectives needed for ozone NAAQS Review.
4/9. The Ozone review process was truncated and accelerated, leading to inadequate scientific review, and inappropriate commingling of science and policy reviews. Fewer opportunities for public comment created a less transparent NAAQS scientific review process
5/9. As professional malpractice, the stripped down and reconstituted CASAC offered advice outside of its expertise, particularly with regard to epidemiology (there were zero epidemiologists on CASAC). The CASAC chair imposed a burden of proof contrary to that of the CAA.
#EPA's status quo rule to leave its current ground-level ozone standard in place cleared #OIRA review yesterday after just two weeks. An agency announcement is coming this afternoon. #AirPollution pic.twitter.com/lIGAQBBgkL
— Sean Reilly (@SeanatGreenwire) December 23, 2020
2/9. Pruitt/Wheeler kicked all 7 members off the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, and replaced them under a policy found to be arbitrary and capricious by the U.S. district court of SDNY. The repopulated CASAC has the appearance of lack of impartiality.
3/9. Wheeler refused to form a CASAC Ozone Review Panel 3 months after EPA issued a call for nominations for such a panel, thereby depriving CASAC of the breadth, depth, and diversity of expertise, experience and perspectives needed for ozone NAAQS Review.
4/9. The Ozone review process was truncated and accelerated, leading to inadequate scientific review, and inappropriate commingling of science and policy reviews. Fewer opportunities for public comment created a less transparent NAAQS scientific review process
5/9. As professional malpractice, the stripped down and reconstituted CASAC offered advice outside of its expertise, particularly with regard to epidemiology (there were zero epidemiologists on CASAC). The CASAC chair imposed a burden of proof contrary to that of the CAA.
#Thread: Though it's important to shed light on the ongoing humanitarian crisis in #Yemen, you could read this entire @reuters article (and most articles written about Yemen) and not know why this boy is starving or who is responsible for these conditions:
The boy travelled from Al-Jawf to Sana'a because al-Jawf is among "high intensity battlefronts" & is the target of repeated civilian airstrikes. https://t.co/1KlIN5ixTf
Also, roads are "damaged" because they're frequently bombed by US/Saudi airstrikes:
Shockingly, he's one of the lucky ones who managed to make it to a hospital.
Only 51% of health facilities are (barely) functioning: https://t.co/GBgKXM562t
And hospitals have been frequently targeted by airstrikes: For example:
International aid & donations are necessary for Faid & millions to survive because of the Saudi/US/UAE blockade that prevents Yemenis from trade and makes them reliant on aid instead. Before the war, Yemen imported 90% of its food; now, 80% rely on aid.
Famine hasn't been declared because the UN faces immense pressure from its top donors, the US & Saudi, who are also causing the famine in Yemen.
The US went as far as pressuring the UN to restrict aid to Northern Yemen, where 70% of Yemenis live:
The boy travelled from Al-Jawf to Sana'a because al-Jawf is among "high intensity battlefronts" & is the target of repeated civilian airstrikes. https://t.co/1KlIN5ixTf
Also, roads are "damaged" because they're frequently bombed by US/Saudi airstrikes:
Shockingly, he's one of the lucky ones who managed to make it to a hospital.
Only 51% of health facilities are (barely) functioning: https://t.co/GBgKXM562t
And hospitals have been frequently targeted by airstrikes: For example:
International aid & donations are necessary for Faid & millions to survive because of the Saudi/US/UAE blockade that prevents Yemenis from trade and makes them reliant on aid instead. Before the war, Yemen imported 90% of its food; now, 80% rely on aid.
Famine hasn't been declared because the UN faces immense pressure from its top donors, the US & Saudi, who are also causing the famine in Yemen.
The US went as far as pressuring the UN to restrict aid to Northern Yemen, where 70% of Yemenis live:
Yesterday, I published my #Festivus waste report, which highlighted $54 billion in truly outlandish waste in government.
Remember this the next time they tell you there’s “nothing to cut.”
I’ll give you some examples of it here:
Researchers used federal funds from grants worth $1,327,781.72 to see if you’ll eat ground-up bugs. Read more here: https://t.co/BU1CjiZdgS
The National Institutes of Health is spending $3,452,234.00 to test if social media messages will get moms to stop their adolescent daughters from using indoor tanning salons. Read more here: https://t.co/BU1CjiZdgS
Remember this the next time they tell you there’s “nothing to cut.”
I’ll give you some examples of it here:
Researchers used federal funds from grants worth $1,327,781.72 to see if you’ll eat ground-up bugs. Read more here: https://t.co/BU1CjiZdgS
The National Institutes of Health is spending $3,452,234.00 to test if social media messages will get moms to stop their adolescent daughters from using indoor tanning salons. Read more here: https://t.co/BU1CjiZdgS
1/
🧵 THREAD about probably one of the BEST discussions about social value of work, economic wealth and fairness in a while.
40 mins with @amolrajan, @PJTheEconomist @elerianm @KGerlich777 Louise Casey
@davidgraeber 🗣️ "The more your job helps others, the less you get paid"
2/
Reminded me of @euan_lawson for @BJGPjournal quoting Michael Sandel on meritocracy: https://t.co/tAl6sobtKW
🗣️ "In an unequal society, those who land on top want to believe their success is morally justified. In a meritocratic society, this means the winners must believe...
3/
🗣️ "...they have earned their success through their own talent and hard work.… at a time when racism and sexism are out of favor (discredited though not eliminated), credentialism is the last acceptable prejudice."
4/
@PJTheEconomist over the last 20 years:
⬇️ 30% per person spending on social care
⬆️ 100% more hospital doctors.
No extra GPs - actually the number of full time equivalents is dropping: https://t.co/n20woUk0Wu
And they aren't equally distributed either (inverse-care law)
5/
When we look at care work @KGerlich777 talks about care sector:
➡️ How it is heavily gendered? 80% women
➡️ How poorly it is paid and misconceptions about what it involves.
Louise Casey explaining needed huge reform and re-structure
🧵 THREAD about probably one of the BEST discussions about social value of work, economic wealth and fairness in a while.
40 mins with @amolrajan, @PJTheEconomist @elerianm @KGerlich777 Louise Casey
@davidgraeber 🗣️ "The more your job helps others, the less you get paid"
Wow: thanks for the humbling response #RETHINK on @BBCRadio4
— Amol Rajan (@amolrajan) January 4, 2021
Superb guests were @PJTheEconomist, @elerianm, Louise Casey, and Karolina Gerlich from the Care Workers' Charity.
But most credit to the producers: Louise Hidalgo, Derrick Bennett, Ros Jones https://t.co/vYHRDHvihq
2/
Reminded me of @euan_lawson for @BJGPjournal quoting Michael Sandel on meritocracy: https://t.co/tAl6sobtKW
🗣️ "In an unequal society, those who land on top want to believe their success is morally justified. In a meritocratic society, this means the winners must believe...
3/
🗣️ "...they have earned their success through their own talent and hard work.… at a time when racism and sexism are out of favor (discredited though not eliminated), credentialism is the last acceptable prejudice."
4/
@PJTheEconomist over the last 20 years:
⬇️ 30% per person spending on social care
⬆️ 100% more hospital doctors.
No extra GPs - actually the number of full time equivalents is dropping: https://t.co/n20woUk0Wu
And they aren't equally distributed either (inverse-care law)
5/
When we look at care work @KGerlich777 talks about care sector:
➡️ How it is heavily gendered? 80% women
➡️ How poorly it is paid and misconceptions about what it involves.
Louise Casey explaining needed huge reform and re-structure