THREAD: STOP UNDERVALUE THE PRIVATE INVESTORS

The misunderstanding of private investors - primarily known as amateur investors when talked about - done by media and professionals is too much.

Are you ready? Hope you will enjoy this one and bring your voice into the debate👇👇

1/x

Are private investors just a bunch of happy gamblers who should let the “real deal” aka professionals invest for them instead? Idk, maybe, maybe not. Peoples own choice, right? But I have an opinion about how media undervalue private investors.

2/

There are many smart persons out there, which have a great skill to hold the same (or more ) knowledge and understanding than professionals.

Why? Because the world has developed so much and the information-level have changed💨

3/

Earlier on you would not get access to accounting; it could be sent by Bloomberg terminal, send by post and even cost money. Now every accounting for every public company is available for free right after disclosure.

4/

Professionals had exclusive access to the board, and even the founders, the professionals had access to industry experts and could connect the dots faster.

Now every interview with the company, blog post by an industry leader or a Q&A with founders is available realtime.

With $GME hitting all time highs, making people millions & some even billions, let's take a look at one of the gaming companies set to IPO soon.

Time for a thread 👇 👇👇

1/ Roblox is like the world’s largest:

🏨 HOTEL COMPANY #AirBnB 👉 doesn’t own real estate
🚕 TAXI COMPANY #Uber 👉 doesn’t own any cars

AND

🎮 DIGITAL PLAYGROUND COMPANY #Roblox 👉 doesn’t create any games

2/ Digital Disney World.

Remember building imaginary forts with your friends in your backyard?

It's like that except digital, pros are building the structures and your parents are spending a lot of $$$ buying gear, digital pets and accessories.

Making $RBLX very rich!

3/ Business Model.

Online gaming platform where millions of kids (and some adults) come to play, learn, communicate, explore, and expand their friendships.

All in 3D digital worlds that are entirely user-built.

4/ Highlights.

- Founded in 2004
- $589MM revenue
- +170MM monthly active users (Oct 2020)
- Freemium, monthly subscription & one-time payments
- US$29.5B Valuation

Ok, here's the $CRESY thread (also posted to https://t.co/fxuIdqDOtQ, where the format may be a bit easier to read).

I haven't been this excited about a position in a long time. I think $CRESY is worth far more than its $6 trading price today. Here's why...

Here's what we have...

More than 1.3M acres of wholly owned SA farmland (beef, corn, soy, sugarcane

62.4% stake in a truly impressive real estate portfolio - 15 malls, 4 skyscrapers, 3 luxury hotels, nearly 1000 acres of land in Buenos Aires and Montevideo, the Buenos Aires fairground, 2 convention centers, a consumer bank, a commercial bank, and an arena, and a US REIT.

A 50% stake in Argentina's biggest ag exchange, and a 22.5% stake in an Ag fintech platform that just raised more money than any Latin American agtech startup in history from Bay Area VCs.

The farming segment itself is profitable, and with the prices of all the commodities they produce skyrocketing, despite more than doubling since the March lows, CRESY is still trading lower YoY and seriously lagging its fundamentals.

Earnings are set to explode.

$TSLAQ Instead of having an accrual palooza, I will dribble these out as I have time and available information. The first account to be reviewed: Automotive Leasing Revenues. The remainder of the planet calls this Sales-Type Leasing (ASC 842.) (1/n)

GAAP allows revenue recognition if a manufacture or dealer leases the preponderance of useful life and economic value of inventory. Computer manufactures are significant users of this accounting treatment. The journal entries for this type of leasing are: (2/n)

The sales are the present value of the payments plus down payment. COGS is the cost of the equipment less the present value of the residual payment. (3/n)

The final receivable entry is the residual value added to the lease payment receivable to remove inventory from the financial statements. $TSLA classifies the lease receivable as an Operating Lease Vehicles, net on the balance sheet and they are subject to depreciation. (4/n)

The assumptions in the calculation that can be subject to manipulation: the implicit interest rate of the lease and the residual payments. Lower rates increase capitalization of the lease which gives higher revenues. Larger residual decreases cost of goods sold. (5/n)

How I Trade

Easy. I trade with the trend. Buy low sell high for up trends. Sell high, buy low during down trends. I don’t care about fundamentals. Often I don’t even know what sector the stock is in. Half my trades, don’t even know the name of the company.

I look at the setup. I look for skew. If a few other variables line up. I stalk it for an entry.

Then I use options to maximize my capital. I mitigate the risk with diversification.

How to spot the trend?

Let’s take a look at this chart. Now. Let’s trade it.

I have no idea how. There are no landmarks. It could be going up, or down, maybe sideways. If I have no clue where it’s going. How do I make a plan? Where do I enter? Where is the exit?

Elliott Waves Principle

Now this one. A simple fact. If you see a 1-2 setup. 3 is next. 3 runs fast and hard. Usually between 100% to 161.8% of 1. However if price break down below 2. This trade is invalid. We have to consider an alternative.

Can you manage a trade like this?

How long does it take to learn Elliott Waves?

Months probably years to be an expert in it.

Not that is not going to do you any good eh? Years to master something before making any money.

I've been trying to understand for some time the impact of $GBTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Trust) on the price of $BTC. Here's a good article to start, and here's a thread on my current thoughts...

There's no doubt that $GBTC has been a driving force in allowing investors to gain exposure to $BTC. For many investors, it provides the easiest way to get crypto exposure. As a result, $GBTC often trades at a large premium (20%-30%) over spot $BTC 2/9

Recently in January, $BTC prices have declined from a high of >$40k to <$30k (now back near $35k). $GBTC's premium to NAV has also dropped to <5% 3/9

It's worth understanding the mechanics of $GBTC. $GBTC allows accredited investors to buy private shares for 0% premium to NAV, and in return the accredited investors are locked up for 6 months. If you are a non-accredited investor, i.e. retail, you don't have this option 4/9

Many sophisticated investors have taken advantage of this arbitrage opportunity. One way an accredited investor can buy private shares of $GBTC is by depositing BTC (often times with leverage). In doing so, they can collect the $GBTC premium 5/9

Things I've learned trading for the past 4 years in no particular order while reflecting this Sunday on it all:

* It always goes higher than you expect it will.

* It always comes back down.

* It is very easy to make money in these markets. It is much harder to keep it.

* You will FOMO no matter how much you say you won't. Make sure you don't FOMO with everything and blow your account.

* You don't need some fancy indicator to be profitable. Get solid with a few (personally for me, Ichimoku and OBV are my favorites)

* Horizontal levels are more reliable than diagonal.

* Trade with friends. They'll tell you when you've fucked up and shame you for it.

* You can follow someone else's TA, but you better be able to tell if they're full of shit or not.

* Risk Management will ultimately lead to your success over time. Luck runs out.

* "As soon as you stop trying to get rich quick, you'll get rich quick."

* Beware of getting sucked into coin communities. They're full of hopium, bag hodlers, and outrageous price predictions. Echo chambers are dangerous.

* Always leave behind a small moon bag. Makes you feel better when it does another 10x.

A lot has been written today about the $GME pump on /r/WallStreetBets from a financial angle.

But I think there's another angle - this it also works as a *multiplayer game* and one with an interesting design.

Don't believe me? Let's look at it structurally!

1/

WSB pump of $GME exhibits a number of gamelike elements:
1. resource mechanics
2. multiplayer social mechanics
3. progression mechanics
4. multi-system interactions
5. prediction complexity, and
6. a powerful player fantasy to tie them together

2/

1. Just by itself, the stock market is an engrossing game (for those who can afford the time and money). It's got a variety of simple resource mechanics (buy / sell stocks), more complex mechanics (buy / sell options), super complex mechanics (would you like some futures?) ... 3/

... and a very high analytic complexity (which mechanic should I apply to maximize return, short term or long term?).

Like in chess, this analysis is very hard but therefore interesting.

And the system gives somewhat clear feedback about how well you're playing ($$$). 4/

2. Now WSB specifically adds social mechanics. Being a lone wolf timing the market is one thing - but banding together to see what you can do together, now that's something else!

Specifically WSB allows not just socializing/meta, but also for coordination. 5/

Mkt view :
Only 290 companies trading above dec 2017 prices which was top of overall broader market. If one looks at nifty which is concentrated in 5 stocks, then it may scare them. Whereas individual stocks have yet lot of room to grow.

In history of markets, when interest rates can not grow and remain so low for another 1 year minimum then stock prices are bound to soar.

How to play in current markets :
1. Debt free and low working capital companies ( as% of sales) with less receivable days and small cash conversion cycles . This ensures company always has money to operate n stay afloat.

2. High growth companies with above 1st condition. Top line of 10% plus and bottom line of 25% plus consistently with increasing or stable operating margins make the company do better in robustness of share price.

In such pandemic corona conditions or earlier demonetization, nbfc liquidity crunch, ilfs, small & midcap dwnfall from 2018: if all of these situations can not stop these companies then What will?

THE ONE WHO STAYED BEHIND

Dimitar Berbatov & Christiano Ronaldo played for Manchester United in the 2008/2009 football session.
That was the only season both players were on the books of Manchester United at the same time...

Berbatov said of Ronaldo; “I was lucky to play alongside Ronaldo for a season. He was 100% professional, on the training pitch & off it.
I don't remember him ever being late for training...

He was always preparing in the gym, after training he would stay & do extra work like working on his shooting, then he would go swimming & go to the gym again…”
The club had strict training sessions. The players had to fit into the training schedules to stay fit & competitive...

They all wanted to excel.
They stuck religiously to these training schedules.
Their lifestyles- their training, eating, drinking, sleeping- everything was under scrutiny.
They were professional athletes, their physical fitness was very key to their success...

So they aligned themselves to these rigid training schedules.
when the training sessions were over, the players would leave for home.
BUT RONALDO WOULD STAY BEHIND!
He would train more.
He would practice more.
He would go swimming to tone his muscles more...

Good evening and welcome to this week’s edition of 11 Wall Street.

This is a weekly thread where i look at happenings in the US equity space in the outgone week.

Please retweet from the very first tweet, so those on your timeline do not miss out.

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to share.

It was a red week across board. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (commonly known as the Dow) fell by 0.91%.

The S&P 500 index fell by 1.48% and the NASDAQ composite index dipped by 1.54%.

Last week marked the commencement of the earnings season, with a number of banks releasing their earnings.

JP Morgan released its Q4 2020 numbers. It made $31.6 billion in revenue and an earnings per share of $3.79

Citigroup made $16.5 billion in revenue, and an earnings per share of $2.08.

Wells Fargo made$17.9 billion in revenue and an earnings per share of $0.64