Ok, here's the $CRESY thread (also posted to https://t.co/fxuIdqDOtQ, where the format may be a bit easier to read).

I haven't been this excited about a position in a long time. I think $CRESY is worth far more than its $6 trading price today. Here's why...

Here's what we have...

More than 1.3M acres of wholly owned SA farmland (beef, corn, soy, sugarcane
62.4% stake in a truly impressive real estate portfolio - 15 malls, 4 skyscrapers, 3 luxury hotels, nearly 1000 acres of land in Buenos Aires and Montevideo, the Buenos Aires fairground, 2 convention centers, a consumer bank, a commercial bank, and an arena, and a US REIT.
A 50% stake in Argentina's biggest ag exchange, and a 22.5% stake in an Ag fintech platform that just raised more money than any Latin American agtech startup in history from Bay Area VCs.
The farming segment itself is profitable, and with the prices of all the commodities they produce skyrocketing, despite more than doubling since the March lows, CRESY is still trading lower YoY and seriously lagging its fundamentals.

Earnings are set to explode.
The land $CRESY possesses is worth perhaps billions.

According to one analysis by @ristic_nick, Los Pozos alone is worth $600M alone. $CRESY has assessed one farm at $10k/hectare.

If we assume a $2k average per hectare (~$800/acre), we arrive at around 1.1B in value.
Farms run by BrasilAgro, which $CRESY owns 33.6% of, add more than 200 additional hectares to the mix. Their BrasilAgro stake is worth ~100M in the open market, and the stake in the land itself is worth ~150M at $2k/hectare. Not to mention BrasilAgro is highly profitable.
The real estate segment is currently trading at just 161M USD (62.4% stake in 257M in capitalization via $IRS). Just two years ago the cap was over a billion. Given most of properties are located in Argentina, valuation likely due to the fact Argentina has been a basket case.
After shedding a number of non core assets, however, like the Lipstick building in New York and an Israeli portfolio, leverage is remarkably low from a loan to value ratio.

If we assume the valuation the loans are based on to be correct, $IRS assets are worth > $4B today.
I don't think it's hard to imagine the assets are worth that much. I mean, these guys own 15 malls, 3 luxury hotels, 4 skyscrapers, 2 capital city convention centers, a fairground, and nearly 1000 acres in core urban real estate. $4B may be trough Argentine disaster pricing.
There's a saying, "In Argentina, we buy our land with cash and our sneakers with credit cards". It's almost unimaginable to see a real estate company with such low leverage and such quality assets, and no history of dilution, trading at such extreme lows.

Blame Argentina!
The real estate segment also owns a 30% stake in a healthy publicly traded consumer bank, and a 37.7% stake in a commercial bank. The commercial bank is losing money, but has a reasonably healthy balance sheet. The consumer bank is profitable.
Next, we have a 50% stake in fyo. FYO started as an ag tech startup in 2000 and evolved into one of the most important brick and mortar commodity exchanges in Latin America. They do futures, options, brokering and trading.
Next, we have a 22.5% stake in Agrofy. Agrofy recently raised 23M in series B money from SP Ventures. This was the largest LatAm agtech deal ever done. Agrofy has 2.6M in annual revenue, which has increased 50% YoY.

They are building Amazon for LatAm ag tech - farms and land.
$CRESY is undervalued by at least 30% upside, sum of parts trading value. Price in ~30% rises since their Q3 report in all the commodities they produce, a normalization in the Argentine economy, and possible unicorn status for Agrofy.

What's $CRESY worth? A hell of a lot more.
Disclosure, I bought some shares last week as well as sold $5 strike puts. After spending a few days reviewing the pieces, I'll be buying more shares, not only in $CRESY, but perhaps in $IRS as well.

#BUY

More from Trading

You May Also Like

Trading view scanner process -

1 - open trading view in your browser and select stock scanner in left corner down side .

2 - touch the percentage% gain change ( and u can see higest gainer of today)


3. Then, start with 6% gainer to 20% gainer and look charts of everyone in daily Timeframe . (For fno selection u can choose 1% to 4% )

4. Then manually select the stocks which are going to give all time high BO or 52 high BO or already given.

5. U can also select those stocks which are going to give range breakout or already given range BO

6 . If in 15 min chart📊 any stock sustaing near BO zone or after BO then select it on your watchlist

7 . Now next day if any stock show momentum u can take trade in it with RM

This looks very easy & simple but,

U will amazed to see it's result if you follow proper risk management.

I did 4x my capital by trading in only momentum stocks.

I will keep sharing such learning thread 🧵 for you 🙏💞🙏

Keep learning / keep sharing 🙏
@AdityaTodmal
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x