My 10 most popular tweets from 2020

Happy New Year everybody!

[THREAD] ⬇️

1/ Thread on how American Express works
https://t.co/mjAMgZtTnN
2/ Thread on how Coca-Cola makes money
https://t.co/v93n0PmoOr
3/ Thread explaining popular software terms
https://t.co/49Q8rztOAc
4/ On consistency https://t.co/opB78u3sH3
5/ Walmart's 50-year track record https://t.co/yssyd16eyz
6/ "10k in 10 tweets" series
https://t.co/A93YGFyWzl
7/ Twilio and WhatsApp https://t.co/49soATUoRV
8/ Alipay stats https://t.co/xPZnO6PW3s
9/ 10k everyday
https://t.co/CYE06MuUbG
10/ Thread from Charlie Munger's Daily Journal Meeting
https://t.co/4iEROFrQfe
End/

Happy New Year! I appreciate you!

More from Twitter

A lot of people are trying to figure out what UCP means by putting this biblical quote out into the twitter verse at Christmas.

Many have piped up with commentary and criticized the mix of religion and politics. A convention long held in Canada.


The quote is often repeated at Christmas. “A child is born...” makes reference to the birth of Jesus. Makes sense.

But what does it mean?

Christians (and other religious observers with their religious texts) have made an art form out of interpreting what passages mean.

To those most radically devout (some might say zealously faithful), hidden divine meanings are gleaned from “correctly” reading the bible.

That’s what Dominionists believe. That god himself wrote the bible. Through inspiration of the actual authors, & only they can interpret.

And thus, the “inerrant“ bible serves as a strict road map to save ones soul.

Many devout Christians view the passage as a prophecy made centuries before the birth of Christ. A promise made by god through one of his prophets. Jews interpret the passage very differently.

The Anglican Priest is (obviously) correct about this being supersessionism, and a form of Anti-Semitism.

Troublesome as it is for a Canadian provincial govt to be tweeting out Anti-Semitic propaganda, that’s not the only meaning this passage has for Dominionist Christians.

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".