As usual, so much vying for our attention. But tonight two members of Biden team gave the most detailed interview to date abt incoming Admin’s plans for dealing w asylum, Central American migration, & the southern border. It was more a statement of purpose than an action plan. 1/

There are very encouraging signs and, as expected, some lacunae. A few noteworthy details: (1) The advisors said Biden will “expand legal pathways for migration...allowing people to apply for refugee resettlement & temporary worker and employment-based programs” in the region. 2/
All presidential admins (some MUCH more cynically than others) stress the dangerousness of the overland journey to the US. It obviously *is* dangerous. It’s also true that large #s of those arriving at US border don’t qualify for asylum under strict dictates of US imm law. 3/
All legal/policy/humanitarian experts I consult agree: there need to be *more* ways, not less, to give people a chance both to seek asylum & come to US legally (if not permanently) to work. Regional processing helps w this. Language used by Biden team is good in this regard. 4/
What else is striking abt Biden team’s language from interview? (2) Asylum officers will adjudicate claims. This is on the progressive wish-list. It’s a practical and humane way to give people speedier relief and take pressure off of a beleaguered immigration court system. 5/
3) “Other innovative programs to reduce reliance on detention.” The devil will be in the details here, like everything else, but any signal that the new Admin will explore alternatives to detention for those awaiting legal findings in their cases is welcome & sorely needed. 6/
(4) Biden assails the “asylum cooperative agreements” with Guate/El Salvador/Honduras adopted during Trump era. These deals masqueraded as a “regional approach” to asylum, but “solved” the problem at the US border by ending asylum there, & forcing migrants to other countries. 7/
These deals (which were also more popularly known as safe third country agreements) are, in the words of the Biden team, “not who we are as a country.” 8/
Lastly, there are a few esp complex policy matters at border in the immediate term. Biden advisors reiterate that the President will end MPP/Remain in Mexico, which has forced tens of thousands of people into northern Mexico to wait for asylum hearing by US immigration judges. 9/
Arguably, until recently, no single policy has had a greater impact on asylum seekers. A real nightmare. There are currently more than 20K people stuck in northern Mex & thousands of others who abandoned their claims or were shunted away. Fixing this is urgent but also hard. 10/
Biden team hasn’t gone into specifics abt how, exactly, it’ll go abt getting people to safety & giving them their asylum hearings. It would be great to have concrete details now. But, in fairness, the logistics are technical & complicated. This will be a huge one to watch. 11/
The Biden team, in this interview, is also circumspect abt lifting the CDC’s public health order (Title 42), which the Trump Administration adopted in March. In the name of public health, due to Covid, Trump Admin has used this order to turn away 90% of those seeking asylum. 12/
It’s now been amply documented that the Trump Admin adopted Title 42 in bad faith, over the objections of CDC personnel & public health experts. There was no public-health justification for this, and, in fact, it reflected longstanding xenophobic fantasies of WH inner circle. 13/
That said, there are legit concerns abt how the incoming admin can handle the arrival of large #s of people in coming months (due to Covid, hurricanes in the region, continued violence, poverty, Trump’s exit). Title 42 authority is the crucible where these anxieties play out. 14/
A whole lot can be written abt Title 42. Already a federal judge has halted the policy as it applies to unaccompanied kids. The epidemiologists I interview all say there’s NO public-health rationale for a policy that keeps out asylum seekers due to COVID at this point. 15/
In a general sense, though, it’s also true that the US borderlands have been hit very hard by the pandemic. Large #s of CBP personnel are infected. Hospitals are full. Questions remain abt how to get PPE, testing, & social-distancing protocols into place at the border. 16/
So it’s not a big surprise that the Biden team isn’t offering tons of specifics on this just yet. Much more to come! End/

More from Trump

It’s not clear how Dr. Sean Conley has determined Trump will no longer need to isolate only 10 days after symptom onset.

Looks like the CDC Guidelines say Trump should be in the category that needs to isolate for 20 days after symptom onset.👇

Plus ...



2. Fauci on Thursday used a (test-based) approach, in which case, per Fauci:

Trump needs to isolate for 10 days after symptoms RESOLVE (not symptoms onset) and then two negative tests.

Note: based on his coughing on Hannity last night, Trump’s symptoms haven’t resolved yet.


3. Here’s a longer quote from Fauci (via @MarionRenault):

https://t.co/oRdrtxQe80


4. Also noteworthy: on Hannity last night, Trump wouldn’t say he’s tested negative.👇

Thus failing one of the conditions required by Fauci for Trump to be considered no longer contagious.


5/5. This resource on coronavirus (UpToDate) has been specially made available to the public. It describes the test-based and non-test-based approaches.
@Nick_Carmody @NBCNews @BandyXLee1 @Narcopath_UK @narceducator The same tactics used with Trump were used with Hitler by the Evangelicals to set up someone who exhibits qualities as an AntiChrist into a role of a Saint but this time targetting Muslims as Killers of Americans & still using gay people as abomination of God to con churches...1/

@NBCNews @BandyXLee1 @Narcopath_UK @narceducator This was by design and process that developed over 60 years of psychological influencing through a collaboration of the entertainment world, religious broadcasts, oil/gas loyalists who bastardized the US Constitution, and #KochNetwork #DarkMoney orgs connected to DeVos...2/

@NBCNews @BandyXLee1 @Narcopath_UK @narceducator Judeo-Christian America never existed. 1A was designed to removed Roman Catholic Church of England hold over the newly formed US Government. It demands zero influence of religion over law or government decisions. The Virginia Baptist insisted on it w/ Thomas Jefferson...2/

@NBCNews @BandyXLee1 @Narcopath_UK @narceducator Judeo-Christian is coined from Nitzche's book "The AntiChrist" that means Jews converting to Christianity. It is used in the context we see today to tie in a Jewish Jesus into the Torah so that the strict rules of the Torah are elevated to a Christian philosophy. A paradox...4/

@NBCNews @BandyXLee1 @Narcopath_UK @narceducator It is a paradox because Jesus was a rebel Jew. He defied the teachings of the Torah which pissed off the Pharisees - Jewish religious leaders. He elevated poor & people society condemned to same level as leaders. He is nothing like what we see today as American Christianity...5/

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.