1/ Just realized this morning that it was 5 years ago today that I invested in @densityio ... it has truly been such a great career experience for me. Some notes ...
More from Trading
Collaborated with @niki_poojary
Here's what you'll learn in this thread:
1. Capture Overnight Theta Decay
2. Trading Opening Range Breakouts
3. Reversal Trading Setups
4. Selling strangles and straddles in Bank Nifty
6. NR4 + IB
7. NR 21-Vwap Strategy
Let's dive in ↓
1/ STBT option Selling (Positional Setup):
The setup uses price action to sell options for overnight theta decay.
Check Bank Nifty at 3:15 everyday.
Sell directional credit spreads with capped
A thread about STBT options selling,
— Jig's Patel (@jigspatel1988) July 17, 2021
The purpose is simple to capture overnight theta decay,
Generally, ppl sell ATM straddle with hedge or sell naked options,
But I am using Today\u2019s price action for selling options in STBT,
(1/n)
@jigspatel1988 2/ Selling Strangles in Bank Nifty based on Open Interest Data
Don't trade till 9:45 Am.
Identify the highest OI on puts and calls.
Check combined premium and put a stop on individual
Thread on
— Jig's Patel (@jigspatel1988) July 4, 2021
"Intraday Banknifty Strangle based on OI data"
(System already shared, today just share few examples)
(1/n)
@jigspatel1988 3/ Open Drive (Intraday)
This is an opening range breakout setup with a few conditions.
To be used when the market opens above yesterday's day high
or Below yesterday's day's
#OpenDrive#intradaySetup
— Pathik (@Pathik_Trader) April 16, 2019
Sharing one high probability trending setup for intraday.
Few conditions needs to be met
1. Opening should be above/below previous day high/low for buy/sell setup.
2. Open=low (for buy)
Open=high (for sell)
(1/n)
You May Also Like
One thing I've been noticing about responses to today's column is that many people still don't get how strong the forces behind regional divergence are, and how hard to reverse 1/ https://t.co/Ft2aH1NcQt
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 20, 2018
See this thing that @lymanstoneky wrote:
And see this thing that I wrote:
And see this book that @JamesFallows wrote:
And see this other thing that I wrote:
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?