In this Video I have discussed about Mean Reversion Intraday Trading Strategy

More from JayneshKasliwal

The Ultimate Guide to moving averages !
A mega thread to understand the Use of 21 , 50 and 200 ema.
4 Effective uses of Exponential Moving Averages !

Retweet and Share 🔄
#stockmarkets #nifty
@kuttrapali26 @caniravkaria

Once Can refer the use of Moving Averages Throught this thread


4 Popular uses of moving averages

1. Identifying the direction of trend
2. MA crossover
3. Dynamic Support and Resistance
4. Price Crossing above Key EMAs

Note : In chart 21 ema is red , 50 ema is green and 200 ema is black

2/n


Why EMA and not SMA ?
EMA is fast , accurate and prices in recent data !
3/n


Use 1 : Identifying the trend of stock on dtf

The 21 ema will tell us the Short term trend of a stock , while the 200 ema will tell us the long term trend of a stocks

Any EMA that is sloping
:upwards trend is BULLISH
:sideways trend is NEUTRAL
:downwards trend is BEARISH
4/n

More from Trading strategies

Detailed Study of Stocks that became 5X in past 2 Years
A Mega Thread🧵

Concepts :
Relative Strength
Stage Analysis

Retweet and Comment If you want to attend a live session on the same !


We have Got around 86 Stocks that became 5X in 2 years
These Belonged to various sectors and Groups

Excel Link for List of Stocks
https://t.co/jESOUM32b5
1/n


All stocks had few things in common :

Stocks doubled Before entering into Stage 2 Uptrend
52 week RS was positive in stage 2
90% stocks even gave all time high breakout after Stage 2
60 Stocks had market cap less than 1000 Cr

Examples : OLECTRA , PGEL
2/n


So What is Relative Strength ?

Relative strength is a strategy used in momentum investing and in identifying value stocks.

It focuses on investing in stocks or other investments that have performed well relative to the market as a whole or to a relevant benchmark.
3/n

How to Apply ?
Type
“Relative Strength”
Choose any
By bharattrader
By traderlion
By Modhelius
I use by bharattrader
In setting use 52 period
Use Weekly Chart
4/n

You May Also Like

A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.