A Guide to Position Sizing

--- Thread 🧵 ---

To perform in the market, position sizing needs to be the main focus.

This is what ultimately separates the good from the great.
It will make no difference on your account if you have a 100% gain in a name with only 1% of your equity.

It will make a huge difference on your account if you have a 100% gain in a name with 20%+ of your equity.
There are 2 consistent ways to position size in the markets 👇

1️⃣ Position Size Based on Risk
2️⃣ Position Size Based on Number of Edges
1️⃣ Position Size Based on Risk

Before you take a position in a stock, you must know how much you are willing to lose on a trade.

We recommend never risking more than 1% of your overall account equity on any single trade, especially if you are in the consistency phase.
Example 1:

▪️ Buy Point: $100
▪️ Stop Loss: $99
▪️ Total Risk: 1%

If your max risk per position is 1% of your overall equity, this setup would allow you to take a 100% equity position and still be within your rules if the trade goes against you.
Example 2:

▪️ Buy Point: $50.50
▪️ Stop Loss: $49.00
▪️ Total Risk: 3%

If your max risk per position is 1% of your overall equity, this setup would allow you to take a 33% equity position and still be within your rules if the trade goes against you.
You must still be focused on taking your best setups and capitalizing on your best edges, but understand that your position size is based on allotted risk.
2️⃣ Position Size Based on Number of Edges

To position size based on # edges, you must have a great grasp as to what your edges are in the market.

🔸Strongest edges = biggest size
🔸Weakest edges = lowest size
Examples:

▪️ Highest Volume Ever: Up to 25% of equity
▪️ Volatility Contraction Pattern (VCP): Up to 20% of equity
▪️ IPO Base Breakout: Up to 15% of equity
With the rules above, you could have up to 60% of your equity in a name meeting those three characteristics.

You must still trade with a risk first mindset though, knowing where you will exit the trade and how much of your account you are risking if the trade goes against you.
Things to Remember:

▪️ Conviction drives Position Sizing
▪️ $STUDY of your edges is the only way to build conviction
▪️ Whatever style you choose, you must do it consistently
We also have a great presentation that @anishsikri gave on this topic.

You can find that here 👇

https://t.co/hcAKEG8WX1
@anishsikri If you found this thread to be helpful, please like & retweet the first tweet!

If you want more similar content, please follow us
@TraderLion_

Let us know how you position size in the comments below 🔽

More from TraderLion 🦁

More from Traderlion

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?