A Guide to Position Sizing

--- Thread 🧡 ---

To perform in the market, position sizing needs to be the main focus.

This is what ultimately separates the good from the great.
It will make no difference on your account if you have a 100% gain in a name with only 1% of your equity.

It will make a huge difference on your account if you have a 100% gain in a name with 20%+ of your equity.
There are 2 consistent ways to position size in the markets πŸ‘‡

1️⃣ Position Size Based on Risk
2️⃣ Position Size Based on Number of Edges
1️⃣ Position Size Based on Risk

Before you take a position in a stock, you must know how much you are willing to lose on a trade.

We recommend never risking more than 1% of your overall account equity on any single trade, especially if you are in the consistency phase.
Example 1:

β–ͺ️ Buy Point: $100
β–ͺ️ Stop Loss: $99
β–ͺ️ Total Risk: 1%

If your max risk per position is 1% of your overall equity, this setup would allow you to take a 100% equity position and still be within your rules if the trade goes against you.
Example 2:

β–ͺ️ Buy Point: $50.50
β–ͺ️ Stop Loss: $49.00
β–ͺ️ Total Risk: 3%

If your max risk per position is 1% of your overall equity, this setup would allow you to take a 33% equity position and still be within your rules if the trade goes against you.
You must still be focused on taking your best setups and capitalizing on your best edges, but understand that your position size is based on allotted risk.
2️⃣ Position Size Based on Number of Edges

To position size based on # edges, you must have a great grasp as to what your edges are in the market.

πŸ”ΈStrongest edges = biggest size
πŸ”ΈWeakest edges = lowest size
Examples:

β–ͺ️ Highest Volume Ever: Up to 25% of equity
β–ͺ️ Volatility Contraction Pattern (VCP): Up to 20% of equity
β–ͺ️ IPO Base Breakout: Up to 15% of equity
With the rules above, you could have up to 60% of your equity in a name meeting those three characteristics.

You must still trade with a risk first mindset though, knowing where you will exit the trade and how much of your account you are risking if the trade goes against you.
Things to Remember:

β–ͺ️ Conviction drives Position Sizing
β–ͺ️ $STUDY of your edges is the only way to build conviction
β–ͺ️ Whatever style you choose, you must do it consistently
We also have a great presentation that @anishsikri gave on this topic.

You can find that here πŸ‘‡

https://t.co/hcAKEG8WX1
@anishsikri If you found this thread to be helpful, please like & retweet the first tweet!

If you want more similar content, please follow us
@TraderLion_

Let us know how you position size in the comments below πŸ”½

More from TraderLion 🦁

More from Traderlion

You May Also Like

Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! πŸ‘‡

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
β€’ Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
β€’ Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
β€’ The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent β€” this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have β€” though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.