More from The_Chartist 📈
More from Stockslearnings
1 - Accuracy
There is no such thing as 90% Accuracy without compromising on other factors (like profit factor, etc)
Fact - A good trading system will have only 35-60% accuracy without compromising other factors.
(1/n)
2 - Profit Factor (PF)
It is similar to risk-reward. It is derived using the below formula:
Profit Factor = Total Profit by winning trades / Total loss by losing trades
Fact - A trading system above 1.2 PF is good if it scores well with other factors.
(2/n)
3 - Maximum Drawdown
The maximum drawdown also plays a vital role psychologically while picking a trading system.
Fact - Maximum Drawdown in any trading system should not exceed 20%. I suggest picking only the techniques which have less than 10% maximum drawdown.
(3/n)
4 - Maximum Consecutive Losers
We all feel bad even if we lose only Rs.1,000 in a trade. Because it is not only about the money, it is emotionally difficult to accept the failure.
Fact - A good trading system will have less than 15 consecutive losing trades.
(4/n)
TRADE LIKE CRAZY
10 Profitable Intraday Trading Systems, which are backtested against 10-years of Banknifty Historical Data!
(n/n)
https://t.co/BuUie17Ish
Thread's on:
• How to find targets and exit criteria?
• Shanon's Demon (Investing)
• Tradingview scanner- Intraday/BTST
• 90-degree angle inflection point for profit-booking
• Importance of Leverage
Other cool tweets as well.
🧵Shannon's Demon - an investing "thought exercise"
This account writes the best threads, if you like the threads I make, you will surely love this account. Must
1/
— 10-K Diver (@10kdiver) October 23, 2021
Get a cup of coffee.
In this thread, I'll walk you through Shannon's Demon.
This is an investing "thought exercise" -- posed by the great scientist Claude Shannon.
Solving this exercise can teach us a lot about favorable vs unfavorable long-term bets, position sizing, etc.
🧵Finding expected targets and exit criteria to look for to exit the
How to find out the expected targets and what should be the exit criteria when you enter a trade - \U0001f9f5
— Sheetal Rijhwani (@RijhwaniSheetal) October 25, 2021
Possible ways to find out the target:
Check if any patterns forming - it gets quite easy to figure out the targets that way. (1/15)
🧵Trading View Scanner process to trade in momentum stocks.
Trading view scanner process -
— Vikrant (@Trading0secrets) October 23, 2021
1 - open trading view in your browser and select stock scanner in left corner down side .
2 - touch the percentage% gain change ( and u can see higest gainer of today) https://t.co/GGWSZXYMth
🧵90-degree angle inflection point for
The 90 degree angle inflection point in a stock is a signal to book profit
— Nikita Poojary (@niki_poojary) October 24, 2021
Lets understand with a recent example of a stock #IRCTC \U0001f683\U0001f68b
Time for a thread\U0001f9f5
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".