Everything else: demo day, what investors you get, how much you raise, what press covers you -- it is all window dressing.
I just gave a talk to the W2021 YC batch. It's my favorite startup audience to talk to. Here are some of the highlights:
Everything else: demo day, what investors you get, how much you raise, what press covers you -- it is all window dressing.
1/ What is \u201cproduct/market fit\u201d? I\u2019m not sure I can give you a definition. But maybe I can share what the subjective difference is in how it feels when you have it and when you don\u2019t. Founding a startup is deciding to take on the burden of Sisyphus: pushing a boulder up a hill.
— Emmett Shear (@eshear) July 27, 2019
YC is really an accountability framework for you to make fast progress in finding PMF. No one wants to be the person that shows up during office hours and reports that nothing got done the last two weeks.
You should outline your values up front. Then make decisions in accordance with your values. I can’t tell you what they should be (and no one else can).
Start with values. Values will keep you together when you face stressful decision points (selling the company, shutting down, pivoting).
With your cofounders, build trust through vulnerability, clear communication, clear areas of responsibility.
More from Justin Kan
More from Startup
In order to expand their business, startups need to identify and use efficient products (tools). We have listed down Top 5 Products for Startups, and what makes them the top products.😎👇🏻
#prodmgmt #productsforstartups
https://t.co/0IPd51VibU
https://t.co/hICowg9VvP
https://t.co/T3epyQXEoX
https://t.co/Sm8G1JNxx0
#prodmgmt #productsforstartups
https://t.co/0IPd51VibU
https://t.co/hICowg9VvP
https://t.co/T3epyQXEoX
https://t.co/Sm8G1JNxx0
You May Also Like
The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
The story doesn\u2019t say you were told not to... it says you did so without approval and they tried to obfuscate what you found. Is that true?
— Sarah Frier (@sarahfrier) November 15, 2018
In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.
In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.
This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.
In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.