A ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’, the alleged cause of so-called ‘COVID-19’, is based on ‘theoretical’ (NOT actual, NOT real) sequences supplied by a Chinese laboratory to Professor Christian Drosten & Co, early January 2020.
1) To @Kevin_McKernan @MichaelYeadon3 @ClareCraigPath This may appear patronizing & repetitive to you, but as you are REPEATEDLY evading this issue & patronizing lay people who look to you as authorities on a so-called ‘virus’ that has devastated their lives,
I feel it's-
A ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’, the alleged cause of so-called ‘COVID-19’, is based on ‘theoretical’ (NOT actual, NOT real) sequences supplied by a Chinese laboratory to Professor Christian Drosten & Co, early January 2020.
Meaning that, until NOW, there’s NO proof the ‘SARS-CoV-2 virus’ is anything other than a THEORY.
Because Drosten & Co, NOR ANYONE ELSE, is able to MAGIC a purely THEORETICAL virus into an ACTUAL one. https://t.co/QqqUz2lA3Y
Meanwhile, in the REAL WORLD, the flu season had begun to pick up steam, so Drosten and his team, which included PCR ‘test’ manufacturer, Olfert Landt, quickly-
This PCR ‘test’ protocol consisted of some snippets of gene-sequences from Drosten’s computer creation.
https://t.co/ggMBle7d8I
6) Two of the INVENTORS of the so-called '2019-nCoV virus' - later relabeled, 'SARS-CoV-2' - and the PCR test protocol to 'detect' it.
— Deputy Dawgly (@DDawgly) December 20, 2020
Their computer handiwork is the basis of the global #COVIDSCAMDEMIC - a massive FRAUD of which the SCIENCE & POLITICAL world are FULLY AWARE. pic.twitter.com/ID4FbQAG2m
5) To increase the probability of 'positive results', the PCR amplification cycles were set ridiculously high enough to ENSURE a large number of these. No matter what illness a person had at the time of a 'positive test', it could be classed as \u2018COVID-19\u2019 - same for any death.
— Deputy Dawgly (@DDawgly) December 27, 2020
More from Society
Patriotism is an interesting concept in that it’s excepted to mean something positive to all of us and certainly seen as a morally marketable trait that can fit into any definition you want for it.+
Tolstoy, found it both stupid and immoral. It is stupid because every patriot holds his own country to be the best, which obviously negates all other countries.+
It is immoral because it enjoins us to promote our country’s interests at the expense of all other countries, employing any means, including war. It is thus at odds with the most basic rule of morality, which tells us not to do to others what we would not want them to do to us+
My sincere belief is that patriotism of a personal nature, which does not impede on personal and physical liberties of any other, is not only welcome but perhaps somewhat needed.
But isn’t adherence to a more humane code of life much better than nationalistic patriotism?+
Göring said, “people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”+
\u0926\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u092a\u0939\u0932\u0940 \u092c\u093e\u0930 \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3
— AAP (@AamAadmiParty) March 12, 2021
\u0926\u0947\u0936\u092d\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u0915\u0940 \u0938\u094d\u092a\u0947\u0936\u0932 \u0915\u094d\u0932\u093e\u0938 \u0932\u0917\u093e\u090f\u0917\u0940 @ArvindKejriwal \u0938\u0930\u0915\u093e\u0930\u0964
\u090f\u0915 \u092a\u093e\u0920\u094d\u092f\u0915\u094d\u0930\u092e \u092c\u0928\u093e\u092f\u093e \u091c\u093e\u090f\u0917\u093e, \u091c\u093f\u0938\u0938\u0947 \u092c\u091a\u094d\u091a\u094b\u0902 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0915\u0942\u091f \u0915\u0942\u091f \u0915\u0930 \u0926\u0947\u0936\u092d\u0915\u094d\u0924\u093f \u092d\u0930\u0940 \u091c\u093e\u090f\u0917\u0940\u0964 pic.twitter.com/iO6WMBh4YG
Tolstoy, found it both stupid and immoral. It is stupid because every patriot holds his own country to be the best, which obviously negates all other countries.+
It is immoral because it enjoins us to promote our country’s interests at the expense of all other countries, employing any means, including war. It is thus at odds with the most basic rule of morality, which tells us not to do to others what we would not want them to do to us+
My sincere belief is that patriotism of a personal nature, which does not impede on personal and physical liberties of any other, is not only welcome but perhaps somewhat needed.
But isn’t adherence to a more humane code of life much better than nationalistic patriotism?+
Göring said, “people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”+
