I believe very strongly we need to start tolerating one another more, making space for one another, working hard to bridge the divide. It's a theme I've been on about for a while. And I get push-back - often very indignant and heated. Sometimes outright accusatory. #cdnpoli 1/16

A point I keep trying to make, with varying degrees of success, is no matter how much other people may bug you, even disgust you, they're simply not going to disappear tomorrow. So we need to live together. It's not a question of if, it's only a question of how. #cdnpoli 2/16
The response I've never understood is the purist one. I refuse to live with X. I make no allowance for Y. How dare you (turning the question back on me) even imply we should tolerate Z. That's offensive. They are wrong and we are right. It's simple. No compromises. #cdnpoli 3/16
I consider purists to be comically self-indulgent. I've even started arguments over it. I recognize the attraction of purity. It feels great to stand firm on principle and uphold what's right. The question I return to is - now what? They're still here, as are we. #cdnpoli 4/16
What I forget, sometimes, is I view this as a political problem and not everyone does, even when talking about politics. They hear me say we need to live with the "other side" and imagine I mean make friends with them, date them, go bowling with them. That isn't it. #cdnpoli 5/16
If a certain kind of person disgusts you, you can cut them out of your life. Stop being friends with them, stop inviting them to family functions, refuse even to work with them if you have that luxury. You can socialize with only like-minded people. To a point. #cdnpoli 6/16
I wonder if the ability to curate our news, our online communities, even our own "facts" has led to the odd impression we can curate people we dislike entirely out of our environment. That doesn't actually work. Again, the basic problem. They're still here. #cdnpoli 7/16
So, to the issue. How do we live together? Saying you don't want to live with those people at all doesn't solve the problem. It just makes it someone else's problem to solve. That's exactly what politics is. I can't force you to care about it. But I do, very much. #cdnpoli 8/16
Purists love to imagine the problem gets solved when they win. Some of them are very happy right now. But the other side becomes desperate in equal measure. Society can't function when half of us are terrified of the other half at all times. Isn't that obvious? #cdnpoli 9/16
I'd love to offer a sweeping solution, but truthfully I don't have one. It's easier to burn bridges than build them. Rapprochement is a challenge and not one I find easy myself, no matter how many people call me out as an apologist. But it's our challenge to meet. #cdnpoli 10/16
I know we need to start, at least, with the most basic observation I keep making. They're here. So are we. They aren't leaving. Neither are we. We need to function as a society. That's part of what government does. We need to talk and work together. Somehow. #cdnpoli 11/16
I admit what I've failed to see at times in the past. You can opt-out of the problem if you like. It's hard for many people, frankly. But if you pass on the dirty, difficult task of making society function, you really might want to go easy on the criticism too. #cdnpoli 12/16
I know viewing things from this perspective - making politics a problem for all of us to solve - can be challenging. But I think we're up for it. People say that social media, the Internet, digital communities are dividing us. I actually see great hope in this. #cdnpoli 13/16
I think we've all been greatly empowered by access to information, to dialogue, to creating our own audiences both large and small. With that power comes responsibility - which we've struggled with at times - and a learning curve. But we'll get there. #cdnpoli 14/16
The reason I get so pissy (and I do, I know) with people who blow off the problem of just living with others around us, and imagining that purity and righteousness will make that problem go away, is that I see it as an abdication of power and responsibility. #cdnpoli 15/16
I don't have a solution. I've said that already. But I want to work on the problem with anyone else who wants to try. Tell me you can't be bothered if you like. I can live with that. Just don't tell me it's simple. It isn't. It's the defining challenge of our time. #cdnpoli 16/16

More from Society

So, as the #MegaMillions jackpot reaches a record $1.6B and #Powerball reaches $620M, here's my advice about how to spend the money in a way that will truly set you, your children and their kids up for life.

Ready?

Create a private foundation and give it all away. 1/

Let's stipulate first that lottery winners often have a hard time. Being publicly identified makes you a target for "friends" and "family" who want your money, as well as for non-family grifters and con men. 2/

The stress can be damaging, even deadly, and Uncle Sam takes his huge cut. Plus, having a big pool of disposable income can be irresistible to people not accustomed to managing wealth.
https://t.co/fiHsuJyZwz 3/

Meanwhile, the private foundation is as close as we come to Downton Abbey and the landed aristocracy in this country. It's a largely untaxed pot of money that grows significantly over time, and those who control them tend to entrench their own privileges and those of their kin. 4

Here's how it works for a big lotto winner:

1. Win the prize.
2. Announce that you are donating it to the YOUR NAME HERE Family Foundation.
3. Receive massive plaudits in the press. You will be a folk hero for this decision.
4. Appoint only trusted friends/family to board. 5/

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
Great article from @AsheSchow. I lived thru the 'Satanic Panic' of the 1980's/early 1990's asking myself "Has eveyrbody lost their GODDAMN MINDS?!"


The 3 big things that made the 1980's/early 1990's surreal for me.

1) Satanic Panic - satanism in the day cares ahhhh!

2) "Repressed memory" syndrome

3) Facilitated Communication [FC]

All 3 led to massive abuse.

"Therapists" -and I use the term to describe these quacks loosely - would hypnotize people & convince they they were 'reliving' past memories of Mom & Dad killing babies in Satanic rituals in the basement while they were growing up.

Other 'therapists' would badger kids until they invented stories about watching alligators eat babies dropped into a lake from a hot air balloon. Kids would deny anything happened for hours until the therapist 'broke through' and 'found' the 'truth'.

FC was a movement that started with the claim severely handicapped individuals were able to 'type' legible sentences & communicate if a 'helper' guided their hands over a keyboard.