Consider this to be an educational thread to all international media that has pissed me off for a long time now.

(Sorry for the length but I needed to so it hopefully sticks)

https://t.co/78W3yGvZ9O
https://t.co/EzO2xnTVtB
https://t.co/ONG3pW3lJ0
https://t.co/dI1gxqp9S5
https://t.co/Lst5iKwKKT
https://t.co/2DneRcJSME
https://t.co/iyUCu0wwYk
Sorry, missed the narrative 3: Sweden is not listening to experts or data

More from Society

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x