B2B is hard to scuttlebutt, need to reach out to people in co and hope that are willing to talk. Connections help
Most of market does not beat the market by a lot. Which is alright.
In any activity the distribution of outcomes follows bell curve (Gaussian).
Those that are willing to put in effort reap the benefits. 😀
Otherwise we always have option to go for hard working PM's/etf/mf
Things to need to do before you buy a stock. I wonder though how many investors have the ability for item numbers 5, 6 & 7. I don't pic.twitter.com/E5AMVxbpNb
— Prashanth (@Prashanth_Krish) August 16, 2021
More from Sahil Sharma
More from Screeners
A thread on some features that will help you trade and invest better😀👇
With Nudges, our aim is to help users avoid mistakes at the point of decision-making. We’ll nudge you when you’re about to make a mistake like buy dubious stocks, trade illiquid scrips, stocks with corporate actions etc. Here are a few Nudges that have helped users the most👇
With GTT, you can place long-standing orders. You can place a target and a stop loss for the stocks you buy so that you don’t have to track the prices every day. The orders will remain active until triggered*🏖
If you trade large quantities of scrips with freeze quantity, for example, you'll have to open the order window each time. With sticky order window, the order form remains open even after you place an order so that you can quickly place multiple
Normally after you place an order, the order window closes. With the Sticky order window, the order window remains open, making it easy to place multiple orders with the same input with just one click\u26a1rather than doing it all over again. This helps overcome qty freeze limits. pic.twitter.com/65kXY4h9f0
— Zerodha (@zerodhaonline) November 15, 2021
With the Positions Analysis tool by @BeSensibull, you can see Max loss, Max profit, Breakeven probability of profit, Greeks, IVs and much more right on Kite.
You can also change the price and expiry to see how much you'll gain or lose.
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?