99 names of Allah; a thread

Recall and retweet, you and they earn reward at the end of tweet.



Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) said: “indeed Allah has 99 names, whoever count them shall enter into paradise.

-Al-Bukhari
“And to Allah belong the Best names so invoke by him by them.”
-Qur’an | 07:180

“Allah, there is no deity except him, to him belong the best names.”
-Qur’an | 20:08
1. Al-Rahman
2. Al-Raheem
3. Al-Malik
4. Al-Quddus
5. Al-Salam
6. Al-Mumin
7. Al-Muhaymin
8. Al-Aziz
9. Al-Jabbar
10. Al-Mutakabbir
11. Al-Khaaliq
12. Al-Baari
13. Al-Musawwir
14. Al-Ghaffaar
15. Al-Qahhaar
16. Al-Wahhab
17. Al-Razzaq
18. Al-Fattah
19. Al-Aliim
20. Al-Qaabid
21. Al-Baasit
22. Al-kaafid
23. Al-Raafi
24. Al-Muizz
25. Al-Muzil
26. Al-Samii
27. Al-Baseer
28. Al-Hakam
29. Al-Adl
30. Al-Lateef
31. Al-Khabeer
32. Al-Haleem
33. Al-Azhiim
34. Al-Ghafoor
35. Al-Shakoor
36. Al-Aliyy
37. Al-Kabeer
38. Al-Hafeez
39. Al-Muqeet
40. Al-Haseeb
41. Al-Jaleel
42. Al-Kareem
43. Al-Raqeeb
44. Al-Mujeeb
45. Al-Waasi
46. Al-Hakeem
47. Al-Wadud
48. Al-Majeed
49. Al-Ba’ith
50. Al-Shaheed
51. Al-Haqq
52. Al-Wakeel
53. Al-Qawiyy
54. Al-Mateen
55. Al-Waliyy
56. Al-Hameed
57. Al-Muhsee
58. Al-Mubdi
59. Al-Mueed
60. Al-Muhyi
61. Al-Mumeet
62. Al-Hayy
63. Al-Qayyoom
64. Al-Waajid
65. Al-Maajid
66. Al-Waahid
67. Al-Ahad
68. Al-Samad
69. Al-Qaadir
70. Al-Muqtadir
71. Al-Muqaddim
72. Al-Mu’akhkhir
73. Al-Awwal
74. Al-Akhir
75. Al-Zhaahir
76. Al-Baatin
77. Al-Waali
78. Al-Muta’ali
79. Al-Barr
80. Al-Tawwaab
81. Al-Muntaqim
82. Al-Afuww
83. Al-Ra’oof
84. Malik Al-Mulik
85. Zhul Jalali Wal Ikram
86. Al-Muqsit
87. Al-Jaami’
88. Al-Ghaniyy
89. Al-Mughni
90. Al-Maani’
91. Al-Darr
92. Al-Naafi’
93. Al-Noor
94. Al-Haadi
95. Al-Badii’
96. Al-Baaqi
97. Al-Warith
98. Al-Rasheed
99. Al-Saboor

He is Allah ﷻ the creator the inventor, the fashioner; to him belong the best names.

-Qur’an | 59:24.

More from Religion

just a my thought...

❶/12 Roughly speaking, primitive Buddhism was about liberation from the inner suffering of the ordained individual. In contrast, Mahayana Buddhism, especially the teachings of the Lotus Sutra, emphasises 'the salvation of all people, together'.


❷/12 In short, people of Mahayana Buddhism do Practice as Bodhisattva for all in the secular world. Strictly, these are different religions, and primitive Buddhism is not well suited to being associated with the state or secular communities.

❸/12 I believe that if anti-secular primitive Buddhism had arrived in ancient Japan it would not have spread very far. In Japan, where rice cultivation is very important, the idea of destroying the community would have been a threat of people's survival.

❹/12 By the way, it's perhaps inevitable that the purity of the teachings will diminish depending on how they are disseminated in society. In other words, I think that, roughly speaking, what develops away from the original form can even become a civilization.

❺/12 But anything that significantly reduces the quality of the original should be called a degeneration. I think that Christian civilization, although flawed, has built a civilization in tension.

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?