🖍 What is investing cycle?
😄 2006-07, 2009-10, 2017, 2021
What fundamental, what valuation, what governance, what history when future bright 🤡
😕 2002-03, 2008, 2012-13, 2018-19
Only invest in good companies, fair valuation, with good history and honest promoter 🥵
More from kumar saurabh
#No 1 #Shreedigvijaycement
#AR2021 #Shreedigvijay cement. Started this year annual report reading with Digvijay cement. First time read a cement company AR. Some interesting comments on overall economy. Watch it herehttps://t.co/AQM2snbcHG pic.twitter.com/JL4lx26LlC
— kumar saurabh (@suru27) June 1, 2021
#No 2 #Bajajconsumer
#AR2021 #Bajajconsumer. 2nd company. Highlights - Rs 30 cr cost cutting sustainable ? Who gets Rs 8-9 Cr royalty benefit ? Who owns brand ? Why infra subsidiary with losses, intangible asset complexity ? Industry grown fat 2% in volume n 8% in value at 10 yr cagr pic.twitter.com/W4C0H2h8aV
— kumar saurabh (@suru27) June 7, 2021
An extended analysis of the morning tweet is in this Youtube video. Like and retweet for wider reach
morning tweet on NASDAQ
#NASDAQ How much NASDAQ can fall?
— kumar saurabh (@suru27) June 14, 2022
Since 2000, this is the 3rd worst fall in NASDAQ
2000: 77% fall from peak
2008: 55% fall from peak
2022: 34% fall from peak pic.twitter.com/MO8KNtzQez
More from Market cycle
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x