
ZUCKERBERG'S ELECTION🚨
1/ Funded by $350 Million from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, activist organizations created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on whether they lived in Democrat or Republican strongholds.🔻


In Pennsylvania, $13,063,828 for Clinton and $692,742 for Trump.
CTCL hidden COVID-19 grant agenda was to increase the votes for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.🔻


The “Wisconsin Safe Election Plan” was not authored by the state. Effectively, CTCL managed the election in these five cities.
•Promote no voter ID "indefinitely confined"
•Drop Boxes breaching chain of custody
•Consolidating counting centers🔻

Election officials hired & trained by CTCL failed to provide meaningful bi-partisan observation. They gave direct access of state voter files to "leftist" groups like 'Rock The Vote'. Thousands of ballots were cured without oversight from bipartisan observers.🔻

CTCL paid election judges & election officials in Philadelphia mandated polling places & drop boxes.
In Democrat Delaware County, there was 1 drop box every 4 square miles.
In 59 Republican counties, there was 1 drop box every 1,100 square miles.🔻

Fulton County allowed private access directly to government voter registration files & access to early voting opportunities.
CTCL-funded counties had drop boxes every 14 square miles while unfunded counties had drop boxes every 294 square miles.🔻

Zuckerberg-money initiated the use of drop boxes for ballot collection, significantly breaching the chain of custody & failing to maintain proper logs to ensure all properly cast ballots were counted & all improperly cast ballots were not counted.🔻

Zuckerberg's charity, CTCL, paid for election judges, purchased the drop boxes, ordered the consolidation of the counting facilities, paid the election officials that boarded up the windows, & dictated the policies that undermined state law.🔻


Mahalo to @PhillDKline for fighting for election integrity as a private citizen and compiling this report on how private funds enabled election fraud in several key states.🔻
https://t.co/ekl5es8AnO
https://t.co/uGA5yeCEwB
CTCL\U0001f6a8
— Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) December 5, 2020
Zuckerberg donated $400M to help with local elections. In Philadelphia, CTCL dictated the polling places, paid the election officials, brought in drop boxes, consolidated the counting centers. In short, private partisan funds led to a violation of equal protection laws.\U0001f53b pic.twitter.com/8j7TxPldZ2
More from Kanekoa
There is overwhelming evidence of election fraud in all contested states. Therefore it is the duty of the Executive, Legislative, & Judicial branches to throw out the fraudulent votes & to honor their oath to protect & defend the Constitution of the USA.🇺🇸🦅

https://t.co/XP9LQuEPtY
*The Evidence Collection*
— Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) December 29, 2020
There is overwhelming evidence of election fraud. Therefore it is the duty of the Executive, Legislative, & Judicial branches to throw out the fraudulent votes & to honor their oath to protect & defend the Constitution of the USA.\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8\U0001f985
A list below.\U0001f53b pic.twitter.com/x57NgPVhhd
https://t.co/LMeZ6uOfzW
Thread of my threads. pic.twitter.com/KCQ1AOoIn3
— Kanekoa (@KanekoaTheGreat) November 23, 2020
You May Also Like
Viruses and other pathogens are often studied as stand-alone entities, despite that, in nature, they mostly live in multispecies associations called biofilms—both externally and within the host.
https://t.co/FBfXhUrH5d

Microorganisms in biofilms are enclosed by an extracellular matrix that confers protection and improves survival. Previous studies have shown that viruses can secondarily colonize preexisting biofilms, and viral biofilms have also been described.

...we raise the perspective that CoVs can persistently infect bats due to their association with biofilm structures. This phenomenon potentially provides an optimal environment for nonpathogenic & well-adapted viruses to interact with the host, as well as for viral recombination.

Biofilms can also enhance virion viability in extracellular environments, such as on fomites and in aquatic sediments, allowing viral persistence and dissemination.

If everyone was holding bitcoin on the old x86 in their parents basement, we would be finding a price bottom. The problem is the risk is all pooled at a few brokerages and a network of rotten exchanges with counter party risk that makes AIG circa 2008 look like a good credit.
— Greg Wester (@gwestr) November 25, 2018
The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.
This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.
The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."
This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.
Like company moats, your personal moat should be a competitive advantage that is not only durable—it should also compound over time.
Characteristics of a personal moat below:
I'm increasingly interested in the idea of "personal moats" in the context of careers.
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
Moats should be:
- Hard to learn and hard to do (but perhaps easier for you)
- Skills that are rare and valuable
- Legible
- Compounding over time
- Unique to your own talents & interests https://t.co/bB3k1YcH5b
2/ Like a company moat, you want to build career capital while you sleep.
As Andrew Chen noted:
People talk about \u201cpassive income\u201d a lot but not about \u201cpassive social capital\u201d or \u201cpassive networking\u201d or \u201cpassive knowledge gaining\u201d but that\u2019s what you can architect if you have a thing and it grows over time without intensive constant effort to sustain it
— Andrew Chen (@andrewchen) November 22, 2018
3/ You don’t want to build a competitive advantage that is fleeting or that will get commoditized
Things that might get commoditized over time (some longer than
Things that look like moats but likely aren\u2019t or may fade:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
- Proprietary networks
- Being something other than one of the best at any tournament style-game
- Many "awards"
- Twitter followers or general reach without "respect"
- Anything that depends on information asymmetry https://t.co/abjxesVIh9
4/ Before the arrival of recorded music, what used to be scarce was the actual music itself — required an in-person artist.
After recorded music, the music itself became abundant and what became scarce was curation, distribution, and self space.
5/ Similarly, in careers, what used to be (more) scarce were things like ideas, money, and exclusive relationships.
In the internet economy, what has become scarce are things like specific knowledge, rare & valuable skills, and great reputations.