1/n Many cited this article as evidence for historicity of Md

It is work of some Ahemdiya and is full of non-scholarly arguments.

In this thread I rebut each claim one by one.

Truth: no archaeological evidence for Muhammad from around his

2/n Lies around Gospel of Mark, Mathew, Luke
3/n Lies through Thomas the Presbyter
4/n The myth of Sebeos
5/n Papyrus letter sent by Muslim Admin in Egypt
7/n The biggest propaganda through Abd-Al-Malik
8/n Abd Al Malik, was being transformed into Muhammad.
9/n
10/n Tombstone Of ʿAbāssa Bint Juraij, 71 AH / 691 CE, first inscription mentioning Muhammad and Islam but after 50 years from alleged death of former and at a distance of 950 miles from Mecca.

Does it not look like problem?

More from History

You May Also Like

Still wondering about this 🤔


save as q
Margatha Natarajar murthi - Uthirakosamangai temple near Ramanathapuram,TN
#ArudraDarisanam
Unique Natarajar made of emerlad is abt 6 feet tall.
It is always covered with sandal paste.Only on Thriuvadhirai Star in month Margazhi-Nataraja can be worshipped without sandal paste.


After removing the sandal paste,day long rituals & various abhishekam will be
https://t.co/e1Ye8DrNWb day Maragatha Nataraja sannandhi will be closed after anointing the murthi with fresh sandal paste.Maragatha Natarajar is covered with sandal paste throughout the year


as Emerald has scientific property of its molecules getting disturbed when exposed to light/water/sound.This is an ancient Shiva temple considered to be 3000 years old -believed to be where Bhagwan Shiva gave Veda gyaana to Parvati Devi.This temple has some stunning sculptures.