1/n Many cited this article as evidence for historicity of Md

It is work of some Ahemdiya and is full of non-scholarly arguments.

In this thread I rebut each claim one by one.

Truth: no archaeological evidence for Muhammad from around his

2/n Lies around Gospel of Mark, Mathew, Luke
3/n Lies through Thomas the Presbyter
4/n The myth of Sebeos
5/n Papyrus letter sent by Muslim Admin in Egypt
7/n The biggest propaganda through Abd-Al-Malik
8/n Abd Al Malik, was being transformed into Muhammad.
9/n
10/n Tombstone Of ʿAbāssa Bint Juraij, 71 AH / 691 CE, first inscription mentioning Muhammad and Islam but after 50 years from alleged death of former and at a distance of 950 miles from Mecca.

Does it not look like problem?

More from History

You May Also Like