1/15
Why can cefepime cause neurological toxicity?

And why is renal failure the main risk factor for this complication?

The answer requires us to learn about cefepime's structure and why it unexpectedly binds to a certain CNS receptor.

#MedTwitter #Tweetorial

2/
Let's establish a few facts about cefepime:

🔺4th generation cephalosporin antibiotic
🔺Excretion = exclusively in the urine (mostly as unchanged drug)
🔺Readily crosses the blood-brain barrier (so it easily accesses the brain)

https://t.co/rjYG1BfGPR
3/
The first report of cefepime neurotoxicity was in 1999.

A patient w/ renal failure received high doses of cefepime and then developed encephalopathy, tremors, myoclonic jerks, and tonic-clonic seizures.

✅All symptoms resolved after hemodialysis.

https://t.co/u7JLVitQpp
4/
Cefepime neurotoxicity is surprisingly common, occurring in up to 15% of treated critically ill patients (w/ symptoms varying from encephalopathy to seizures).

💡The main risk factors = renal failure and lack of dose adjustment for renal function.

https://t.co/nxbnzSq8AR
5/
What about cefepime induces neurotoxicity?

One clue is that it's not the only antibiotic that causes neurotoxicity, particularly seizures.

This actually is a class effect w/ other beta-lactam antibiotics (including penicillins and carbapenems).

https://t.co/Lf4BhON9IY
6/
Recall that beta-lactam antibiotics all share a common structural feature: a beta-lactam ring.

https://t.co/iWXweuG4Ct
7/
A 1971 study in cats implicated beta-lactam rings as the source of neurotoxicity.

High doses of penicillin were used to induce seizures.

🔑But pre-incubation w/ the enzyme beta-lactamase (disrupts the beta-lactam ring) blocked all seizure activity.

https://t.co/M3lDiXm88N
8/
So why can beta-lactam antibiotics like cefepime cause neurotoxicity?

It turns that they block the binding of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) to its receptor.     

🔑Cephalosporins block GABA particularly effectively.

https://t.co/Eo0OlTduOE
9/
The GABA receptor has two subtypes (A and B), and the A subtype functions as a ligand-gated Cl⁻ ion channel.

Cefepime binds to the GABA-A receptor and blocks Cl⁻ influx, which correlates with its ability to induce seizure activity.

https://t.co/l2f9QHHEEW
10/
We've established that cefepime blocks GABA.

This induces neuro-excitation leading to seizures and other neurotoxic manifestations such as tremors and encephalopathy.

💡But why is there such a strong link with renal failure?
11/
An obvious explanation would be that, since cefepime is renally cleared, elevated serum and CNS drug levels build up.

This is supported by the observation that cefepime and other cephalosporins block GABA in a concentration-dependent manner.

https://t.co/l2f9QHHEEW
12/
But increased drug levels might not be the only reason that patients w/ renal failure are predisposed to neurotoxicity.

The milieu around neurons seems to matter as well.
13/
This experiment in rat brain slices simulated a "renal" milieu by using a hyperkalemic medium around neurons.

⚡️Exposure to higher potassium levels significantly increased the ability of cefepime to induce epileptiform discharges.

https://t.co/vb3p4xXdTm
14/
Let's ask one final question.

Why can cefepime (and other beta-lactam antibiotics) block the GABA receptor?

Exactly why hasn't been well-studied but it likely reflects sufficient structural similarity w/ GABA.

https://t.co/KN7I6ACXvb
15/
🧠Cefepime induces neurotoxicity by blocking the GABA receptor, similar to other beta-lactam antibiotics
🧠This results from structural similarities between GABA and the beta-lactam ring
🧠Renal failure = main risk factor b/c of ⬆️ drug levels +/- hyperkalemia

More from Health

You May Also Like

हिमालय पर्वत की एक बड़ी पवित्र गुफा थी।उस गुफा के निकट ही गंगा जी बहती थी।एक बार देवर्षि नारद विचरण करते हुए वहां आ पहुंचे।वह परम पवित्र गुफा नारद जी को अत्यंत सुहावनी लगी।वहां का मनोरम प्राकृतिक दृश्य,पर्वत,नदी और वन देख उनके हृदय में श्रीहरि विष्णु की भक्ति अत्यंत बलवती हो उठी।


और देवर्षि नारद वहीं बैठकर तपस्या में लीन हो गए।इन्द्र नारद की तपस्या से घबरा गए।उन्हें हमेशा की तरह अपना सिंहासन व स्वर्ग खोने का डर सताने लगा।इसलिए इन्द्र ने नारद की तपस्या भंग करने के लिए कामदेव को उनके पास भेज दिया।वहां पहुंच कामदेव ने अपनी माया से वसंतऋतु को उत्पन्न कर दिया।


पेड़ और पौधों पर रंग बिरंगे फूल खिल गए और कोयलें कूकने लगी,पक्षी चहकने लगे।शीतल,मंद,सुगंधित और सुहावनी हवा चलने लगी।रंभा आदि अप्सराएं नाचने लगीं ।किन्तु कामदेव की किसी भी माया का नारद पे कोई प्रभाव नहीं पड़ा।तब कामदेव को डर सताने लगा कि कहीं नारद क्रोध में आकर मुझे श्राप न देदें।

जैसे ही नारद ने अपनी आंखें खोली, उसी क्षण कामदेव ने उनसे क्षमा मांगी।नारद मुनि को तनिक भी क्रोध नहीं आया और उन्होने शीघ्र ही कामदेव को क्षमा कर दिया।कामदेव प्रसन्न होकर वहां से चले गए।कामदेव के चले जाने पर देवर्षि के मन में अहंकार आ गया कि मैने कामदेव को हरा दिया।

नारद फिर कैलाश जा पहुंचे और शिवजी को अपनी विजयगाथा सुनाई।शिव समझ गए कि नारद अहंकारी हो गए हैं और अगर ये बात विष्णु जी जान गए तो नारद के लिए अच्छा नहीं होगा।ये सोचकर शिवजी ने नारद को भगवन विष्णु को ये बात बताने के लीए मना किया। परंतु नारद जी को ये बात उचित नहीं लगी।
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.