Categories Government
My latest for
"The BBC needs a chairman committed to demolishing its institutional groupthink. . . . . . .it isn't going to get one, thanks solely to the timidity & duplicity of Johnson and his flaccid government"
As pretty much confirmed by @Madz_Grant's perceptive sketch of the new BBC chairman's not so much grilling as gentle warming by an unthreatening DCMS Select
"He fluently deployed trendy corporate jargon and phrases like 'matrix of diversity'. The licence fee, he added, was the 'least-worst' model, although 'when we next get a chance to review ... it may be worth reassessing'."
Doesn't exactly suggest a radical reformer, does it?
Already clear from Maitlis' continued blatant editorialising, despite new #BBC CEO's instruction to curb it, that Davie's executive writ barely runs to his own office door.
Sadly, BBC's new chairman looks unlikely to change that.
#DefundTheBBC
ICYMI: \u201cThere are millions of Americans who are very worried one man can create a lie so huge that his supporters believe in him over the principle of democracy."@maitis pushes Tea Party Movement co-founder @michaeljohns over his belief the election was "stolen"#Newsnight pic.twitter.com/SENIYKdbsd
— BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) January 14, 2021
Over past week, have become convinced that getting all doses out now is better
Its NOT a no-brainer
Reasonable people can (and do!!) disagree
So here's why my thinking evolved
Thread
In @washingtonpost, @ashishkjha & I argue for the 2nd-shot-deferred strategy, partly by invoking the Mike Tyson principle. https://t.co/ZxrgVj3TJe We both came to this view because of the slow rollout & the new variant. But it's a tough call and reasonable people will disagree.
— Bob Wachter (@Bob_Wachter) January 3, 2021
Obviously, if you want to stick to the trials (reasonable position), then stay with standard interval
But soon, we'll be confronted with question -- do we give 2nd shot to some people or 1st shot to more people
Is there clinical trial evidence that 1 dose is helpful?
Yes
2/n
Yes
There is compelling data from Pfizer and Moderna trials that after about 10 d after 1 dose, you get 80-90% efficacy
https://t.co/38qlTYP77u
https://t.co/4V8SxM3tU5
So the BIG question is -- is that going to be durable beyond 21 to 28 days?
We don't know for sure
3/n
But while we may not be sure, it doesn't mean we have no idea
Here's one of our nation's most expert immunologists, @VirusesImmunity laying out her assessment of delayed vs immediate 2nd
My first tweet of 2021 is going to be about 1 dose vs. 2 dose vaccine. I have tweeted in the past of the immunological advantages of a 2 dose vaccine. However, given the enhanced transmission variants on the rise, we need a modified strategy. (1/n) https://t.co/si1bxgKqbf
— Prof. Akiko Iwasaki (@VirusesImmunity) January 1, 2021
What I take away from Dr. Iwasaki's thread and broader experience with vaccines is that it its unlikely that a short delay will harm protection
But we can't be sure
So why take this risk at all?
Why not just stay with the clinical trial?
Reasonable question
Here's why
5/9
What - and who - pushed her into thinking it was the right thing to do.
You might want to consider that many people like her are still out there.
Unpopular opinion, perhaps, but Babbit had it coming.
— The Biggest Mad. (@TweakaliciousTV) January 22, 2021
Crazy thought, but what if we started focusing our efforts on fighting the sources of disinformation that pushed Ashli over the edge.
What if we taught people how to spot propaganda -- especially from their own political side?
If you're left leaning - like me - consider left wing propaganda.
(What? There's no such thing!)
Sure there is. The left scares its voters, same as the right.
(Yeah, but we scare them about REAL crises, not racist nonsense.)
Hmm.
The core idea isn't about left vs right. It's about power, and manipulating people to obtain that power.
And no, I'm not saying that #BothSides practice this to the same degree.
I'm saying we all have blind spots when we agree with what's being said and who's saying it.
When you're inclined to believe some thing A, it might be easy to get you to believe a related thing B. Then thing C, and D, and so on.
Until eventually you believe thing Q.
And as crazy as thing Q is, there are a disturbingly large number of letters that come after it.
/1
We cannot live in a world where Twitter\u2019s terms of service are more important than the terms in our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
— Rep. Matt Gaetz (@RepMattGaetz) January 11, 2021
1. If you enter my place of business & you start calling for an over-throw of the U.S. govt, or shout racist stuff or yell insults at me or my employees or my staff - I will ask you to leave & have the police remove you if U refuse. /2
2. In banning U from my place of business, I have NOT violated any of your rights. U have no right to disrupt my place of business and I have every right to not allow disgusting ppl like you to verbally abuse me, my customers or staff. /3
3. In fact, one of the great things abt American ideals (tho not always f/u in reality) that we should not allow discrimination based on a person's race, sex, religion, class, sexual orientation, disability, etc, BUT indvl citizens have a RIGHT to free association. /4
4. Similarly, businesses should not be allowed to discriminate based on race, sex, religion, class, sexual orientation, disability, etc, but can forbid/ban based on behavior/speech. /5