Categories Government
Not just rhetoric, but actions that put lives of Members of Congress and Senators at increased risk.
Thread collecting these reports.
1/ Val Demings - "there was some inside
Rep. Val Demings has just confirmed to @CNN that she believes "there was some inside assistance" for the Capitol rioters.
— Amee Vanderpool (@girlsreallyrule) January 13, 2021
2/ Ayanna Pressley's Chief of Staff - Staff noticed all of the panic buttons in Pressley's office were torn out BEFORE the attack while they were barricading the room.
According to Ayanna Pressley\u2019s chief of staff Sarah Groh, the panic buttons in the Congresswoman\u2019s office were all \u201ctorn out\u2014the whole unit.\u201d
— Eoin Higgins (@EoinHiggins_) January 13, 2021
They don\u2019t know why or who did it. https://t.co/MLhxhi7nUp pic.twitter.com/l7wgoHOJKN
The Vice President has the power to reject fraudulently chosen electors.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 5, 2021
This is what @lessig and I have called the "VP Super Power Theory" in our course on disputed presidential elections @Harvard_Law. We do a deep dive into it on the Another Way to Elect a President podcast
What's the backstory of this radical theory of the VP's power? Poor drafting of the Twelfth Amendment, which says: "The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted."
Note the passive voice: the VP opens the certificates, but who does the counting? (Writing tip: avoid the passive voice, especially when drafting a constitutional provision that allocates critical powers among political actors.)

So, the VP Super Power Theorist argues, the VP is the only actor mentioned in the sentence so it *must* be the VP who does the counting (and thus can reject electors' votes). Wrong. Every single method of interpretation demonstrates otherwise. Let's go through them:
The entire CIA, FBI, and AG have been outworked by a private attorney.
The 2020 Election is a cyber Pearl Harbor:
— Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs) December 10, 2020
The leftwing establishment have aligned their forces to overthrow the United States government #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs pic.twitter.com/v1hOAPMqGY
And let me add it is the job of the CIA and FBI to PREVENT this from occuring, not investigate after the fact. That mandate was changed after 9/11. Congress needs to ask how did this voter fraud occur and how was it able to operate unimpeded with no disruption from said agencies.
The FBI was mandated to create a Directorate of Intelligence whose main function is to identify emerging threats to the US: terrorism, foreign intelligence service operations, transnational criminal enterprises, and other things on a grand scale like election interference.
The new mandate is to disrupt, deter and dismantle. How did the FBI fail on such a massive scale? The FBI has analytical units in each field division whose sole job is to identify emerging threats in their area of responsibility.
POTUS even identified the threat for the FBI regarding mail in ballot fraud and potential foreign interference. The FBI has something they use to legally collect intelligence in their AOR to prove or disprove if certain activities are occurring.
THREAD.
(Spoiler: It makes the notion even more ridiculous)
Income support doesn't cause overdose. Income support doesn't cause overdose. Income support doesn't cause overdose. Income support doesn't cause overdose. Income support doesn't cause overdose. Income support doesn't cause overdose.
— Hakique Virani (@hakique) December 18, 2020
Income
support
doesn't
cause
overdose.
Temporality?
If CERB caused an increase in fatal ODs, the program had to come *before* the increase. The surge clearly started in *March*.
Compared to Feb:
AB: 43%⬆️
BC: 53%⬆️
ON: 19%⬆️
You couldn't even apply for CERB till *April 6*, and payments didn't come till mid-April.

Dose-response?
In causal relationships, there's⬆️incidence where there's⬆️exposure.
In April when people started getting CERB OD deaths went up in:
AB by 26%
BC by 4.3%
ON by 29%
But the proportion of people getting CERB was statistically *the same* (~23.5%) in each province.

Coherence with established evidence?
The literature shows financial *insecurity*, not financial support, contributes to higher risk substance use and poorer health outcomes. The "CERB made ODs go up" narrative isn't just inconsistent with the science. It's *opposite* to it.

More plausible than other explanations?
The mechanism suggested for the "CERB effect" is that when you give extra money to people previously living on less than we need to survive (that's the *actual* problem), they buy a bunch of drugs and die. So fatality rates go up.

£350m Covid19 award goes to company run by Impellam, where former Tory treasurer has ‘significant interest’. THREAD:

Recruitment firm Medacs Healthcare won the 17 Dec contract to “support medical and clinical services in laboratories” & assist “national testing programme in response to Covid-19”. It’s the 3rd largest Covid-related single award seen by @allthecitizens https://t.co/WjCQXuhTfA

Medacs Healthcare is part of the Medacs Global Group, owned by parent company ‘Impellam Group’. Impellam’s main shareholder & Chairman is Conservative donor Michael Ashcroft. He’s donated £176,104 to the Tories since the pandemic began and £851,029 since 2001.

Lord Ashcroft is listed as having ‘significant influence’ over Impellam. In addition, 56% is owned by the Lombard Trust. In 2010, Ashcroft transferred the 26m shares he held in Impellam to the Lombard Trust; the beneficiaries are his children. https://t.co/Z8gcdRpwKz

Medacs Healthcare is majority owned by Medacs Global Group, which is majority owned by Impellam Group. Medacs Healthcare has also won other Covid contracts: £357,830 on 2 smaller awards to supply temporary health personnel and also was part of two large group contracts.

Treasury sanctions key actors in Iran\u2019s steel sector https://t.co/NxjgtQr6h2
— Treasury Department (@USTreasury) January 5, 2021
@UkNatArchives @VCH_London @bho_history Along with lots of other material (there are some useful subject guides for @bho_history here: https://t.co/loHRv7JvZq - I wrote the Local History one). 2/x
@UkNatArchives @VCH_London @bho_history If you have access, a simple placename search on the Bibliography of British and Irish History will almost certainly pull up anything published in local and national journals. Declaring an interest, I'm a section editor on that, but it is invaluable. 3/x
@UkNatArchives @VCH_London @bho_history With @CHPPC_IHR we've put together some online training/seminars/events which address some key themes (and there are more on the way; please let me know if there's a particular topic you'd like covered): https://t.co/ujY5aYIek8 4/x
@UkNatArchives @VCH_London @bho_history @CHPPC_IHR My colleagues @IHR_Library have put together an excellent guide to free/open access online resources (some grouped under local history but many more are applicable):
"Sadly, watching the Chancellor, once again without even acknowledging or mentioning the excluded left me and so many others bewildered, angry and upset"
#GapsInSupport
Watch live or catch up here:https://t.co/CmnZHiHLqW
— APPG Gaps in Support (@APPGGapsSupport) January 13, 2021
‼️LIVE TWEET THREAD‼️
"For some, the Government has stepped in, a financial safety net. But for so many others, our fellow taxpayers, they have been abandoned and left to fend for themselves"
#GapsInSupport
‼️LIVE TWEET THREAD‼️
"In the words of @AndyBurnhamGM, 'basic fairness demands a solution be found'"
#GapsInSupport
‼️LIVE TWEET THREAD‼️
"During the recall last week, Member after Member from across the House stood up and requested support for those who have been left out.
Incredulously, the Prime Minister said in response, 'Nobody has been excluded'"
#GapsInSupport
‼️LIVE TWEET THREAD‼️
"Kim was deemed ineligible for SEISS because HMRC treats bereavement allowance and the pension payments from her late husband as trade income and therefore she falls foul of the 50/50 rule"
#GapsInSupport
Focus.
This is how our system of government was designed to work. These soldiers swore to defend the constitution.
They are doing exactly that!
Love this, the quintessential minutemen, and minutewomen, guarding democracy.
— Eduardo Sanchez (@edusanchez19us) January 13, 2021
This time, the MAGAs were coming.... https://t.co/AjNticJmyq
NOW: Gov. Jared Polis, who today said Colorado was “lied to” by the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services about promised vaccine shipments, is giving an update on the COVID-19 pandemic in the state.
WATCH LIVE: https://t.co/CiWBfluw7U #COVID19Colorado
Gov. Polis: Today I come before you extremely disappointed that we were lied to by plans from the administration to get second doses.
“There is no federal reserve of doses,” Polis said, explaining the state was expecting 210,000 doses next week. Colorado will only get 79,000.
Polis now providing a timeline on the number of doses starting Jan. 25-31 until Feb. 21.
“We have been misled before but we're expecting (doses) to go up to 90-100K” in the early days of February.
Watch live: https://t.co/CiWBfluw7U #COVID19Colorado

Gov. Polis says he “hopeful” that President-elect Joe Biden's
100 million doses in 100 days” goal will be a reality.
He said Colorado has achieved its goal to vaccine those in Phase 1A by Jan. 15.
"By and large, the priority is 70 and up,” Polis says.
Despite challenges, we believe we can advance a sensible, coherent, humane and just immigration system by focusing on the following 10
1.) Prioritize the reunification of all separated families and strengthen protections for unaccompanied children.
https://t.co/oh9sHxtiTO

2.) Restore U.S. leadership in refugee resettlement.
https://t.co/oh9sHxtiTO

3.) Ensure COVID-19 relief, testing, and treatment regardless of immigration status
https://t.co/oh9sHxtiTO

4.) Reinstate asylum, suspend deportations, and institute ICE and CBP reforms
https://t.co/oh9sHxtiTO
