You've found your way here, likely, through the process of digression and reincarnation (either literal or allegorical).

WTF is going on is the question for the ages--and--it's hotly debate, exactly "WTF is going on".

People with much to lose are sneaking and lying and paralleling the truth. You can learn more here:

https://t.co/DHf9IQLUYW

This was my 1st ever "interview on the internet". The man interviewing me has tragically passed away. Almost two years now probably. How sad.
So it's nearly impossible to discern just WTF is going on. They're tossing around huge military budgets just to manage such things.

I mean, here's a document from 2019, (22 pages), and it's alleging to explain how much is in the budget for 'counterintelligence programs'.
Here's the link, though I've not read it:

https://t.co/Eg10ogQqLg

Of course "counter-intelligence" is just a made up marketing word for "LIES".

So if they're budgeting in the billions, how in the HELL can we ever know WTF is going on?

And that's not the half of it!
AND if you DO figure out a tiny piece of WTF is going on, they'll attack you & troll you.(Using invisible robots of course). & they'll waste your time, & if you're not careful they'll ruin your reputation, especially if you talk of JEWS, which you're likely of course to do.
It would seem that JEWS have a BIG PART to play in "WTF is going on", or, perhaps they've used that BIG budget to just make it LOOK like Jews are involved. Yyou see how convoluted this gets? And now we're both anti-Semites--you and I--Because, I wrote about Jews, and you read it.
And perhaps it's not Jews, it's Jesuits. Or it's Freemasonry. Or it's the British Crown VS the Catholic Church. And this digression goes on and on.

IF you start listing people--and--you fail to mention the Illuminati, or the CFR, or the Council of 100, or Club of Rome, or...
The lesser known CNP, or maybe we need to add Saudi Royals, or very secret and powerful homosexuals... My god if you fail to list ALL of the possible players, then some well informed person on the internet will point our your flaws or omissions or your glaring bias, and now what?
I mean SERIOUSLY!? Now what. Do we try to address our biases or omissions? Do we accuse them of their own biases or omissions? Maybe we accuse them of being a SHILL?! Perhaps they ARE a shill, and they're actually an invisible robot just pretending to be a human on the internet.
Or maybe they're someone in an "asian" country, getting paid pennies a day to manage a whole bank of smart phones or computers, like these people we see in the photographs here on Google:
...and it goes WAY downhill from here man. I mean we can ask WTF is going on with more specify and it becomes a goddamned NIGHTMARE.

EXAMPLES:

✅WTF IS GOING ON W/ USA POLITICS
✅WTF IS GOING ON W/ COVID-19
✅WTF IS GOING ON W/ INDUSTRIAL FARMING
✅ "" "" "" W/ART
✅ "" "" "" W/ HYPERSEXUALIZATION OF CHILDREN
✅ "" "" "" W/ MEDIA PROGRAMMING
✅ "" "" "" W/ CENSORSHIP
✅ "" "" "" W/ THE WEATHER
✅"" "" "" W/ UFO'S/ALIENS
✅"" "" "" W/ THE CHRONOLOGY OF HISTORY
❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓❓
We can do this endlessly.
(Seriously!)

I didn't even scratch the surface right?

...and where are we now? We've made it clear we know FAR LESS of 'WTF is going on' than we did when I 1st started trying to answer your question.

I do hope this helps!
🤷🤷🤷
ps

It looks like I might have been prompted to write this thread by a BOT!

...oh the IRONY!
😅😅😅

More from For later read

Wow, Morgan McSweeney again, Rachel Riley, SFFN, Center for Countering Digital Hate, Imran Ahmed, JLM, BoD, Angela Eagle, Tracy-Ann Oberman, Lisa Nandy, Steve Reed, Jon Cruddas, Trevor Chinn, Martin Taylor, Lord Ian Austin and Mark Lewis. #LabourLeaks #StarmerOut 24 tweet🧵

Morgan McSweeney, Keir Starmer’s chief of staff, launched the organisation that now runs SFFN.
The CEO Imran Ahmed worked closely with a number of Labour figures involved in the campaign to remove Jeremy as leader.

Rachel Riley is listed as patron.
https://t.co/nGY5QrwBD0


SFFN claims that it has been “a project of the Center For Countering Digital Hate” since 4 May 2020. The relationship between the two organisations, however, appears to date back far longer. And crucially, CCDH is linked to a number of figures on the Labour right. #LabourLeaks

Center for Countering Digital Hate registered at Companies House on 19 Oct 2018, the organisation’s only director was Morgan McSweeney – Labour leader Keir Starmer’s chief of staff. McSweeney was also the campaign manager for Liz Kendall’s leadership bid. #LabourLeaks #StarmerOut

Sir Keir - along with his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney - held his first meeting with the Jewish Labour Movement (JLM). Deliberately used the “anti-Semitism” crisis as a pretext to vilify and then expel a leading pro-Corbyn activist in Brighton and Hove

You May Also Like

The chorus of this song uses the shlokas taken from Sundarkand of Ramayana.

It is a series of Sanskrit shlokas recited by Jambavant to Hanuman to remind Him of his true potential.

1. धीवर प्रसार शौर्य भरा: The brave persevering one, your bravery is taking you forward.


2. उतसारा स्थिरा घम्भीरा: The one who is leaping higher and higher, who is firm and stable and seriously determined.

3. ुग्रामा असामा शौर्या भावा: He is strong, and without an equal in the ability/mentality to fight

4. रौद्रमा नवा भीतिर्मा: His anger will cause new fears in his foes.

5.विजिटरीपुरु धीरधारा, कलोथरा शिखरा कठोरा: This is a complex expression seen only in Indic language poetry. The poet is stating that Shivudu is experiencing the intensity of climbing a tough peak, and likening

it to the feeling in a hard battle, when you see your enemy defeated, and blood flowing like a rivulet. This is classical Veera rasa.

6.कुलकु थारथिलीथा गम्भीरा, जाया विराट वीरा: His rough body itself is like a sharp weapon (because he is determined to win). Hail this complete

hero of the world.

7.विलयगागनथाला भिकारा, गरज्जद्धरा गारा: The hero is destructive in the air/sky as well (because he can leap at an enemy from a great height). He can defeat the enemy (simply) with his fearsome roar of war.
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.