Did you catch our thread on the expanding reach of US company Palantir into UK public institutions? £91m+ awarded to the controversial Silicon Valley data-analytics outfit across government. Let's take a closer look at their work with the NHS...

@allthecitizens examined the NHS contracts Palantir won under Covid19, trying to find out what aspects of our health data this private company has been given access to. But we couldn’t find out - key parts of the contracts are redacted.
At least £25.4m in contracts have been awarded to Palantir from UK Health Services. Their latest (Dec 2020) was worth up to £23m for them to continue deploying their Foundry data management platform within the NHS until 2022.

https://t.co/BsdutBO4oZ
Foundry claims it can ‘source, connect, and transform’ data to ‘make operations analytical and analytics operational.’ It’s a big-data system that, in an NHS context, analyses patient data. More specifically, your data.

https://t.co/4hdjhRdyQI
Palantir won their first NHS contract for just £1, supporting the COVID-19 datastore (Mar-June 2020); then a £1m, 4 month extension for the same work; then £908k for aiding the Test & Trace system (June-Sep 2020).

https://t.co/z4cgp0nY4w
The £1 contract was awarded under the emergency procurement legislation brought in under Covid, circumventing the tender process. Palantir provided 45 engineers, costing c.£88,000. Initially it was meant to be a short term agreement.

https://t.co/zt5sV9TQLW
The £1m extension was also not tendered. NHSX even released a statement Palantir would be required to “package up the work they’ve been doing so the service can go out to tender”. That never happened.

https://t.co/9e5V6kqQ8a
The £23m contract wasn’t tendered either, and despite early assurances Palantir’s involvement with the NHS was only an “emergency” response, it seems a much longer-term relationship between Palantir and UK Health Services is now on the cards.

https://t.co/dtjbxvx5MQ
The new contract stipulates the health data gathered by Palantir will extend to Cabinet Office,UK Gov branches, GPs, and local councils - “integrated or collaborating formally with a Local System”. It’s big data across government.
Also, it says some data processes will become “general business-as-usual monitoring” post-pandemic, raising concerns Covid19 is being used as a cover for major data handling changes in government.
So what health data will Palantir have access to? Well, we don’t know. The details of what data sets Palantir can view were redacted on the contract.
Older contracts issued under emergency procurement rules showed Palantir were given access to patient genders, nationalities, work IDs, religious/political beliefs, physical & mental health conditions and past criminal offences.
Why a private company needs access to patient religious or political beliefs, or past criminal offences, is uncertain. Concerns are that Covid19 provides private companies a chance for major public data grabs - and what then happens to that data is not clear.
Also - is there a danger that, as with the initial £1 NHS deal, Palantir gets entry into the NHS via a ‘loss leader’ of discounted software, before becoming enmeshed deep within the NHS’s patient data systems - indispensable and immovable?
In the US, Palantir primarily works with public bodies. @wired reported police forces there who bought them in encountered “spiralling prices, hard-to-use software, opaque terms of service, and “failure to deliver products”

https://t.co/Bzs2BPlmUw
Given No.10’s recent plans to introduce a “radical shake-up” of the NHS, should we be concerned about all these medical contracts that have gone to Palantir? After all it is your data that is at stake here.

https://t.co/WLmqacr3EO
UK Government is required under the NHS Act to consult with the public before making major structural changes to the NHS. They have not done so in this case, despite Westminster moving towards mass-data sharing initiatives across government.

https://t.co/HczYNPjPdl
We don’t know what role Palantir software will play in this, or how the privacy of your medical data will be impacted by this new drive for data-lead “innovation” in government. But if contracts are issued in the dark, delayed, or redacted, how are we even to know?

More from Finance

I'm lucky to attain financial freedom before 30.

I credit Fintwit for my learnings.

Here's 10 key concepts every investor must know:

1. $$ needed to retire
2. Researching a business
3. Reading annual reports
4. Reading earnings calls
5. Criteria of a multi bagger

(Read on...)

6. Holding a multi bagger
7. Economic moats
8. When to buy a stock
9. Earnings vs cashflow
10. Traits of quality companies

Here's my 10 favourite threads on these concepts:

1. How much $$ do you need to retire

Before you start, you must know the end game.

To meet your retirement goals...

How much $$ do you need in your portfolio?

10-K Diver does a good job explaining what's a safe withdrawl rate.

Hint: It's NOT


2. Research a business

Your investment returns are a lagging indicator.

Instead, your research skills are the leading predictor of your results.

Conclusion?

To be a good investor, you must be a great business researcher.

Start with


3. Reading annual reports

This is the bread and butter of a good business analyst.

You cannot just listen to opinions from others.

You must learn to deep dive a business and make your own judgments.

Start with the 10k.

Ming Zhao explains it

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".