2/25
WTT MEDIA CLASS
HATE LIKE THE PRESS 101
Welcome to class everyone. Today we will learn 2 different kinds of news story. Then we will ignore the good one and go for the one that (if done enough) will create a profitable moral panic against transgender people. (Long Thread)
1/25
2/25
3/25
1. A statement that someone has said
2. Proof that they said it
3. Other views BRIEFLY at the end (which most people will not get to)
4. Lies that are presented as equal to the (optional) truth
And
5. Few/No Trans quotes or names
4/25
Almost every transphobic news report fits a "They said" model.
5/25
Lesbians going extinct due to people being trans
Subject: Transgender people existing?
Statement from: LGB Alliance
Proof they said it: Journalist interview
https://t.co/yhgCMX5DJq
6/25
Evidence: https://t.co/bwjZTHsViL
ONS figures shows UK population percentage of gay men and lesbian women rise from 2014 to 2018
(Delete this if potential profitability threatened)
7/25

Bonus point: LGB Alliance allegedly cites studies showing elevated rates of autism in transgender people. They do not link/name studies. Are they good/bad studies? Who knows?
8/25
Oh right, that is just going to be a fact in it now? That this happened? AWESOME!
Pro LGB Alliance bias established. Their word is truth now.
9/25
Number of trans people mentioned by name: 0
This report successfully makes trans people a faceless, voiceless force. References throughout of 'clashes' with feminists. No details provided (physical? verbal? WHO KNOWS?)
10/25
11/25
NEXT: The Silly Famous Source
12/25
JK Rowling says she got 3000 letters of support after essay
Subject - JK Rowling wrote anti-trans blog
Statement from: JK Rowling
Proof she wrote it: https://t.co/LjglYYp45i
https://t.co/xs3JPlv2AE
13/25
Since writing my essay, I\u2019ve received over 3000 emails thanking me for speaking up. I\u2019ve been brought to tears many times while reading, sometimes out of gratitude for their kindness, but also because many women have shared their own experiences of violence & sexual assault. 4/9
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) June 28, 2020
This story is JK tweeted words. The reporter does not have to prove JK received those letters. Only that JK tweeted those words. This is a unique privilege of the silly famous. Anything they say can be a story. Truth, lie, the reporter can use ANYTHING.
14/25
But this is not the same as it being proven. The only proven thing is JK said she did. This is not the same as proof of 3000 letters.
A "This is" story on this would need the reporter to see the 3000 letters. But that's HARD
15/25
But all news reporting is biased in some form. Unbaised reporting is a fiction.
16/25
What The Trans has a pro trans bias.
The most insidious biases live in "unbiased" outlets. But they have them too.
17/25
18/25
19/25
Number of trans people mentioned by name: 0
BUT this is where we get to say "We are allies!" because we link to a story about trans people quitting an agency they share with JK! But they could only get that because, it is still about JK...
20/25
21/25
22/25
23/25
"Christians say Labour councils want book about gay parents in all schools" + "Thatcher says children shouldn't have right to be gay" = Section 28
Oh that's right. You see, if you do this long enough...the government will legislate
24/25
Welcome to the free press.
Congratulations!
You have passed HATE LIKE THE PRESS 101. Please use this to spot awful shit and not create your own? Please?
25/25
But you used JK Rowlings claim, took it as truth and then republished loads of her transphobic crap.
And again, talking about trans issues for this many words without speaking to a single one?
If you did a report on posties with no posties...
I can't know this for sure. But if I had to bet....I would bet that you knew of all the inaccuracies.
More from Education
We've been falsely told 'schools are safe', 'don't drive community transmission', & teachers don't have a higher risk of infection repeatedly by govt & their advisors- to justify some of the most negligent policies in history. 🧵
data shows *both* primary & secondary school teachers are at double the risk of confirmed infection relative to comparable positivity in the general population. ONS household infection data also clearly show that children are important sources of transmission.
Yet, in the parliamentary select meeting today, witnesses like Jenny Harries repeated the same claims- that have been debunked by the ONS data, and the data released by the @educationgovuk today. How many lives have been lost to these lies? How many more people have long COVID?
has repeatedly pointed out errors & gaps in the ONS reporting of evidence around risk of infection among teachers- and it's taken *months* to get clarity on this. The released data are a result of months of campaigning by her, the @NEU and others.
Rather than being transparent about the risk of transmission in school settings & mitigating this, the govt (& many of its advisors) has engaged in dismissing & denying evidence that's been clear for a while. Evidence from the govt's own surveys. And global evidence.
Why?
Questions have to be asked about the evidence Jenny Harries gave to the Education Committee today about the risk to teachers.
— Adam Hamdy (@adamhamdy) January 19, 2021
Was she aware of this data?
If not, why wasn\u2019t she properly briefed?#COVID19 #schools https://t.co/4wa1PyAJld pic.twitter.com/eqFjaA1zYC
data shows *both* primary & secondary school teachers are at double the risk of confirmed infection relative to comparable positivity in the general population. ONS household infection data also clearly show that children are important sources of transmission.
Yet, in the parliamentary select meeting today, witnesses like Jenny Harries repeated the same claims- that have been debunked by the ONS data, and the data released by the @educationgovuk today. How many lives have been lost to these lies? How many more people have long COVID?
has repeatedly pointed out errors & gaps in the ONS reporting of evidence around risk of infection among teachers- and it's taken *months* to get clarity on this. The released data are a result of months of campaigning by her, the @NEU and others.
Rather than being transparent about the risk of transmission in school settings & mitigating this, the govt (& many of its advisors) has engaged in dismissing & denying evidence that's been clear for a while. Evidence from the govt's own surveys. And global evidence.
Why?