Wanted to circle round on this from last week & reiterate the importance of getting underneath the issues. Last fall, @ErinStraza & I did a @PersuasionCAPC series to highlight those deep differences & called it #ForGodandCountry.

Series started w/ an episode w/ @KaitlynSchiess on how political formation & spiritual formation relate.

Underlying Q: What is the purpose of political engagement? To love neighbor or to win for our group?
https://t.co/TBlqt96x2j
We followed that up w/ a convo w/ @socofthesacred on the phenomenon of Christian Nationalism.

Underlying Q: How should the church & state relate to each other? What role should faith play in political engagement?

https://t.co/mLLeudhOav
Then in episode 3, we settled in to talk about political tribalism and the danger of "us vs. them" mentality.

Underlying Q: How should we relate to those who hold opposing viewpoints? What happens when we tie ourselves to certain politicians & parties?

https://t.co/PWSOCbB0sS
In episode 4, we discuss the call to "just preach the gospel" & @samhaist joins us to talk discipleship irt political engagement.

Underlying Q: What does the gospel demand of Christians in a broken world? Should we detach from public arena? Can we?

https://t.co/VnalvMdWZo
Next @KathrynAnnette joined us to explore the role of public debate & the risk of voicing political opinions.

Underlying Q: How is silencing used to control debate? What happens when we stop talking to each other & simply talk to likeminded folks?

https://t.co/mz22c9j6pv
Finally, we wrapped up w/ the dynamics of voting & whether it's possible to "waste your vote." @TheAlanNoble joined us to talk virtue > policy

Underlying Q: Is a vote a mere calculus about policy initiatives? Does our vote incriminate us? Is it moral?

https://t.co/DSVRcG4BN3
Our goal w/ this series was to expose the places of deep disagreement that might otherwise be hidden. For example, if you believe politics is tool to pursue common good, you're probably going to relate to it differently than a person who uses it to protect them & theirs.
IME, these deep divides can be both philosophical & theological. The shifts occurring slowly over time & perhaps completely undetected--both by yourself & those around you.
The differences only become obvious once the presenting symptoms emerge (e.g. vastly different choice of candidate or approach to policy). But if you can trace the differences back to roots, you'll save yourself a lot of agnst & angry debate.
Finally, I'll say this. The changes in my political views over the last 2 decades are deeply linked to my spiritual growth. I do not mean that changing certain views made me more spiritual.
I mean that as I grew in my understanding of deep truths about God, the nature of life, human frailty, neighbor love, the breadth of the gospel, resurrection, & our ultimate hope, it changed me. It changed how I moved thru the world & who I am as a member of a community.
In some ways, it's a lot harder than it used to be. In others, it's liberating. So liberating. But ultimately, my hope for the world does not rest on politics even as I understand politics to be a way to pursue goodness, justice, & love of neighbor.
My righteousness does not rest on a vote or party affiliation. It rests in Christ & the hope that he is actively redeeming this world. And that one day, his shalom will reign & that goodness will overcome evil.
What ever role he calls me to play in political realm, it's as one called to embody his character & love for my neighbors. It's a one whose allegiance is to a better way.

More from Culture

@bellingcat's attempt in their new book, published by
@BloomsburyBooks, to coverup the @OPCW #Douma controversy, promote US and UK gov. war narratives, and whitewash fraudulent conduct within the OPCW, is an exercise in deception through omission. @BloomsburyPub @Tim_Hayward_


1) 2000 words are devoted to the OPCW controversy regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in #Douma, Syria in 2018 but critical material is omitted from the book. Reading it, one would never know the following:

2) That the controversy started when the original interim report, drafted and agreed by Douma inspection team members, was secretly modified by an unknown OPCW person who had manipulated the findings to suggest an attack had occurred. https://t.co/QtAAyH9WyX… @RobertF40396660


3) This act of attempted deception was only derailed because an inspector discovered the secret changes. The manipulations were reported by @ClarkeMicah
and can be readily observed in documents now available https://t.co/2BUNlD8ZUv….

4) @bellingcat's book also makes no mention of the @couragefoundation panel, attended by the @opcw's first Director General, Jose Bustani, at which an OPCW official detailed key procedural irregularities and scientific flaws with the Final Douma Report:
Best books I read in 2020

1. Atomic Habits by @JamesClear

“If you show up at the gym 5 days in a row—even for 2 minutes—you're casting votes for your new identity. You’re not worried about getting in shape. Youre focused on becoming the type of person who doesn’t miss workouts”


Good Reasons for Bad Feelings

https://t.co/KZDqte19nG

2. “social anxiety is overwhelmingly common. Natural selection shaped us to care enormously what other people think..We constantly monitor how much others value us..Low self-esteem is a signal to try harder to please others”


The True Believer by Eric Hoffer

https://t.co/uZT4kdhzvZ

“Hatred is the most accessible and comprehensive of all unifying agents...Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a God, but never without a believe in a devil.”


Grandstanding

https://t.co/4Of58AZUj8

"if politics becomes a morality pageant, then the contestants have an incentive to keep problems intact...politics becomes a forum to show off moral qualities...people will be dedicated to activism for its own sake, as a vehicle to preen"


Warriors and Worriers by Joyce Benenson

https://t.co/yLC4eGHEd4

“Across diverse cultures, a man who lives in the house with another man’s children is about 60 times more likely than the biological father to kill those children.”
I woke up this morning to hundreds of notifications from this tweet, which is literally just a quote from a book I am giving away tonight.

The level of vitriol in the replies is a new experience for me on here. I love Twitter, but this is the dark side of it.

Thread...


First, this quote is from a book which examines castes and slavery throughout history. Obviously Wilkerson isn’t claiming slavery was invented by America.

She says, “Slavery IN THIS LAND...” wasn’t happenstance. American chattel slavery was purposefully crafted and carried out.

That’s not a “hot take” or a fringe opinion. It’s a fact with which any reputable historian or scholar agrees.

Second, this is a perfect example of how nefarious folks operate here on Twitter...

J*mes Linds*y, P*ter Bogh*ssian and others like them purposefully misrepresent something (or just outright ignore what it actually says as they do in this case) and then feed it to their large, angry following so they will attack.


The attacks are rarely about ideas or beliefs, because purposefully misrepresenting someone’s argument prevents that from happening. Instead, the attacks are directed at the person.

You May Also Like