He says that no authority seems to be looking into the grievances of the borrowers.
<< ππ€ππ£ ππ€π§ππ©π€π§ππͺπ’ & ππ£π©ππ§ππ¨π© ππππ«ππ§ >>
#SupremeCourt bench led by Justice Ashok will today take up plea(s) seeking extension of loan moratorium owing to the pandemic alongwith sector-specific pleaβs.
@RBI
#loan
#loanmoratorium #ExtendMoratorium
He says that no authority seems to be looking into the grievances of the borrowers.
He adds that he is unable to understand how the RBI is holding the borrowers hands with the present policy stipulations.
βBut there has to be a cut off date. Otherwise how will there be invocation?β Justice Reddy asks
More from Live Law
More from Court
1) God bless the State of Texas and @KenPaxtonTX What he has just done gives us every chance to save our Republic and our country.
Keep in mind that there are only a few instances where a party can file a direct lawsuit with the U.S. Supreme Court, a state claiming harm by
2) another state is one of those instances.
https://t.co/xvXGDdgDYh
Texas Attorney General @KenPaxtonTX has filed a lawsuit with the Supreme Court seeking and emergency injunction against Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia βfrom taking action to
3) certify presidential electors or to have such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the electoral college.β
@KenPaxtonTX argues that arbitrary changes made by the stateβs governors, secretaries of states and election supervisors were
4) βinconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.β
The lawsuit states: βthese non-legislative changes β¦ facilitated the casting
5) and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution.β [β¦] βBy these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens vote, but
Keep in mind that there are only a few instances where a party can file a direct lawsuit with the U.S. Supreme Court, a state claiming harm by
2) another state is one of those instances.
https://t.co/xvXGDdgDYh
Texas Attorney General @KenPaxtonTX has filed a lawsuit with the Supreme Court seeking and emergency injunction against Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia βfrom taking action to
The ONLY court that can hear the #TexasLawSuit is the Supreme Court of the United States. When a case is between two or more states, the Supreme Court holds both original and exclusive jurisdiction, and no lower court may hear such cases. SCOTUS does not have discretion to ignore
— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) December 8, 2020
3) certify presidential electors or to have such electors take any official action including without limitation participating in the electoral college.β
@KenPaxtonTX argues that arbitrary changes made by the stateβs governors, secretaries of states and election supervisors were
4) βinconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution.β
The lawsuit states: βthese non-legislative changes β¦ facilitated the casting
5) and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution.β [β¦] βBy these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens vote, but
