#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Supreme Court Bench headed by CJI SA Bobde will shortly consider today a batch of PILs seeking removal of farmers protesting at Delhi borders against farm laws.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
SG: I just received a message.
CJI: We don’t have any information of him appearing.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Courtmaster informs CJI that no AOR has informed of Salve’s appearance.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Tiwari continues his submissions.
CJI: This is such an important matter. Why can’t you argue it properly ? We are asking, what is your standing, your issues and your prayer.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
CJI: Please don’t interrupt us, there’s no case of Salve before us.
Om Prakash Parihar makes submissions now.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
CJI: How many people had blocked the road there ? Will the number of people not determine this ? Who will take responsibility ? There can be no precedent in law and order situation.
CJI asks the Petitioners if the organisations have been added. Parihar responds that there is no information of the organisations.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Parihar: Then the Court will say that we are relying on newspaper reports and dismiss this.
CJI: You should be assisting the Court. Don’t unnecessarily argue with us.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
“I don’t know if this is the farmer’s fault or the government’s fault”.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt
Mani submits that he knows the pain of protesting in the peak cold.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
SG: I have not blocked the road.
SG: The farmers are protesting and roads have been blocked by Delhi Police.
CJI: So, the only party who is actually on ground is you.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
SG: Bhartiya Kisan Union. The government will not do anything against the interest of farmers. Sit with the government clause by clause, then there can be a discussion or debate with an open mind.
SG: I can give you the name within ten minutes. Immediately I can think of Bhartiya Kisan.
Adv. Rahul Mehra, GNCTD appears: No efforts have been made to check the veracity of the claims of the Petitioners and to show the authenticity.
SG: He seems to be appearing for some farmer organisation.
Mehra: I can also say that you are appearing for something else.
SG: Yes, we will talk over call.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
More from Live Law
More from Court
I've decided that I will not be spouting off an uninformed, kneejerk opinion on a topic I don't have enough information about. Instead I shall cast shame on the idiots who do, and bring further confusion to everyone.
We as a people have been defanged not only by being fed wheelbarrows full of raw unmitigated horseshit, but even the knowledge of where to go to find this information has been buried beneath obscuring layers of horseshit thicker than the planet's crust.
We do not live in a democracy, whose vital functions require a freeflow of information much like pure capitalism requires a completely informed consumer populace. We instead live in an oligopoly of knowledge, where important facts we need to know are denied to us and hoarded away
Much like how we do not live under true capitalism as knowledge we need to make informed decisions as consumers is locked away and hidden behind thicc layers of legal documents, denying us knowledge of our rights under the rules of commerce we allegedly agreed to.
This is how we are denied our rights. By denying us knowledge of our rights, and then by denying us pathways to seek said knowledge, and if not removing them then hiding them within websites hosted on fucking geocities servers and javascript written by lowest bidder.
What\u2019s your level of optimism on this election going to the Supreme Court
— Dr. Gulag inmate president elect 69420 (@ViewnComs) December 17, 2020
We as a people have been defanged not only by being fed wheelbarrows full of raw unmitigated horseshit, but even the knowledge of where to go to find this information has been buried beneath obscuring layers of horseshit thicker than the planet's crust.
We do not live in a democracy, whose vital functions require a freeflow of information much like pure capitalism requires a completely informed consumer populace. We instead live in an oligopoly of knowledge, where important facts we need to know are denied to us and hoarded away
Much like how we do not live under true capitalism as knowledge we need to make informed decisions as consumers is locked away and hidden behind thicc layers of legal documents, denying us knowledge of our rights under the rules of commerce we allegedly agreed to.
This is how we are denied our rights. By denying us knowledge of our rights, and then by denying us pathways to seek said knowledge, and if not removing them then hiding them within websites hosted on fucking geocities servers and javascript written by lowest bidder.
In the MATTER OF Jones David HOLLISTER
A171609.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
July 8, 2020.
https://t.co/qB3G8IAtxS we must correctly interpret the statute.
Stull v. Hoke, 326 Or. 72, 77, 948 P.2d 722 (1997).
legal change of sex from male or female to nonbinary
Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and Mooney, Judge, and Hadlock, Judge pro tempore.
https://t.co/oJuecwvEKc
Bruce L. Campbell, John C. Clarke, and Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP filed the brief amicus curiae for Transgender Law Center, interACT, and Beyond Binary Legal.
Does ORS 33.460 permit the circuit court to grant a legal change of sex from male or female to nonbinary? The circuit court concluded that the statute does not permit such a change, and it denied petitioner's application under ORS 33.460
A171609.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
July 8, 2020.
https://t.co/qB3G8IAtxS we must correctly interpret the statute.
Stull v. Hoke, 326 Or. 72, 77, 948 P.2d 722 (1997).
legal change of sex from male or female to nonbinary
Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and Mooney, Judge, and Hadlock, Judge pro tempore.
https://t.co/oJuecwvEKc
J. Gibbons https://t.co/TieeoF2bZd
— braingarbage (@braingarbage) December 5, 2020
Bruce L. Campbell, John C. Clarke, and Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP filed the brief amicus curiae for Transgender Law Center, interACT, and Beyond Binary Legal.
Does ORS 33.460 permit the circuit court to grant a legal change of sex from male or female to nonbinary? The circuit court concluded that the statute does not permit such a change, and it denied petitioner's application under ORS 33.460