#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Supreme Court Bench headed by CJI SA Bobde will shortly consider today a batch of PILs seeking removal of farmers protesting at Delhi borders against farm laws.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
SG: I just received a message.
CJI: We don’t have any information of him appearing.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Courtmaster informs CJI that no AOR has informed of Salve’s appearance.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Tiwari continues his submissions.
CJI: This is such an important matter. Why can’t you argue it properly ? We are asking, what is your standing, your issues and your prayer.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
CJI: Please don’t interrupt us, there’s no case of Salve before us.
Om Prakash Parihar makes submissions now.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
CJI: How many people had blocked the road there ? Will the number of people not determine this ? Who will take responsibility ? There can be no precedent in law and order situation.
CJI asks the Petitioners if the organisations have been added. Parihar responds that there is no information of the organisations.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
Parihar: Then the Court will say that we are relying on newspaper reports and dismiss this.
CJI: You should be assisting the Court. Don’t unnecessarily argue with us.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
“I don’t know if this is the farmer’s fault or the government’s fault”.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt
Mani submits that he knows the pain of protesting in the peak cold.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
SG: I have not blocked the road.
SG: The farmers are protesting and roads have been blocked by Delhi Police.
CJI: So, the only party who is actually on ground is you.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
SG: Bhartiya Kisan Union. The government will not do anything against the interest of farmers. Sit with the government clause by clause, then there can be a discussion or debate with an open mind.
SG: I can give you the name within ten minutes. Immediately I can think of Bhartiya Kisan.
Adv. Rahul Mehra, GNCTD appears: No efforts have been made to check the veracity of the claims of the Petitioners and to show the authenticity.
SG: He seems to be appearing for some farmer organisation.
Mehra: I can also say that you are appearing for something else.
SG: Yes, we will talk over call.
#FarmersProtests #SupremeCourt #FarmLaws2020
More from Live Law
#LIVE Delhi High Court Women Lawyers Forum in Association with LiveLaw is conducting a Webinar on the topic 'Attack On Love Marriages And Freedom Of Choice'.
#FreedomOfChoice
Watch the Webinar live at :
YouTube link: https://t.co/l074foe9RA
Facebook link:
https://t.co/d0m3h0Ut1w
Instagram Link:
Advocate Kajal Chandra begins the webinar and introduces the panelist Justice AP Shah, Delhi High Court’s Former Chief Justice. Advocate Gayatri Virmani introduces Human Rights Activist Jagmati Sangwan.
#FreedomOfChoice
The moderator Adv Chandra questions Justice Shah: Do the freedom of Religious ordinance of laws stand the test of Constitutionality and in your opinion, do they violate the fundamental right of liberty including the freedom to choose? #FreedomOfOpinion
Delhi High Court’s Former Chief Justice AP Shah: This topic cannot be discussed without referring to the Indian Constitution that guarantees Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity and protects dignity of individual and Unity and integrity of the Nation. #FreedomOfChoice
#FreedomOfChoice
Watch the Webinar live at :
YouTube link: https://t.co/l074foe9RA
Facebook link:
https://t.co/d0m3h0Ut1w
Instagram Link:
Advocate Kajal Chandra begins the webinar and introduces the panelist Justice AP Shah, Delhi High Court’s Former Chief Justice. Advocate Gayatri Virmani introduces Human Rights Activist Jagmati Sangwan.
#FreedomOfChoice
The moderator Adv Chandra questions Justice Shah: Do the freedom of Religious ordinance of laws stand the test of Constitutionality and in your opinion, do they violate the fundamental right of liberty including the freedom to choose? #FreedomOfOpinion
Delhi High Court’s Former Chief Justice AP Shah: This topic cannot be discussed without referring to the Indian Constitution that guarantees Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity and protects dignity of individual and Unity and integrity of the Nation. #FreedomOfChoice
More from Court
so @tedwheeler did you hear? today we are discussing "public whippings" thanks to @JamesBuchal
its a great chance to study the history of public beatings.
understandably, women feel threatened. https://t.co/jck05JGM4B
#PDX #tourism
FIRST OREGON WIFE-BEATER TO RECEIVE WHIPPING POST PUNISHMENT
https://t.co/3SJOODbuLf
PORTLAND. Or., June 7—The whipping post law passed at the last session of the Legislature was Into execution for the first time today, the victim being Charles Mcdlnty, convicted of wlfe-beatlng
whip was a braided blacksnake, made of rawhide, with four lashes. ..hustled to jail, stripped to the
waist, manacled, and his hands tied to the door high above his head. The whipping was as severe as the powerful deputy was capable of administering. Blood drawn on the 4th blow.
its a great chance to study the history of public beatings.
understandably, women feel threatened. https://t.co/jck05JGM4B
#PDX #tourism
@MultCoDA https://t.co/GgR1rCGIdG @OregonStateBar @BrentWeisberg @USAO_OR
— braingarbage (@braingarbage) November 28, 2020
Even if this is a "joke" or a drunk tweet, it appears that he is inciting gender-based violence on a woman via Twitter@twittersupport pic.twitter.com/TcaBiQ2wvU
FIRST OREGON WIFE-BEATER TO RECEIVE WHIPPING POST PUNISHMENT
https://t.co/3SJOODbuLf
PORTLAND. Or., June 7—The whipping post law passed at the last session of the Legislature was Into execution for the first time today, the victim being Charles Mcdlnty, convicted of wlfe-beatlng
whip was a braided blacksnake, made of rawhide, with four lashes. ..hustled to jail, stripped to the
waist, manacled, and his hands tied to the door high above his head. The whipping was as severe as the powerful deputy was capable of administering. Blood drawn on the 4th blow.
In the MATTER OF Jones David HOLLISTER
A171609.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
July 8, 2020.
https://t.co/qB3G8IAtxS we must correctly interpret the statute.
Stull v. Hoke, 326 Or. 72, 77, 948 P.2d 722 (1997).
legal change of sex from male or female to nonbinary
Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and Mooney, Judge, and Hadlock, Judge pro tempore.
https://t.co/oJuecwvEKc
Bruce L. Campbell, John C. Clarke, and Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP filed the brief amicus curiae for Transgender Law Center, interACT, and Beyond Binary Legal.
Does ORS 33.460 permit the circuit court to grant a legal change of sex from male or female to nonbinary? The circuit court concluded that the statute does not permit such a change, and it denied petitioner's application under ORS 33.460
A171609.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
July 8, 2020.
https://t.co/qB3G8IAtxS we must correctly interpret the statute.
Stull v. Hoke, 326 Or. 72, 77, 948 P.2d 722 (1997).
legal change of sex from male or female to nonbinary
Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and Mooney, Judge, and Hadlock, Judge pro tempore.
https://t.co/oJuecwvEKc
J. Gibbons https://t.co/TieeoF2bZd
— braingarbage (@braingarbage) December 5, 2020
Bruce L. Campbell, John C. Clarke, and Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP filed the brief amicus curiae for Transgender Law Center, interACT, and Beyond Binary Legal.
Does ORS 33.460 permit the circuit court to grant a legal change of sex from male or female to nonbinary? The circuit court concluded that the statute does not permit such a change, and it denied petitioner's application under ORS 33.460