🚨🚨🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧🚛🚒🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨🚨 serious #brexit story alert - companies now starting to see penny drop on what rules of origin does to supply chains (food for example) but Brussels seems deaf to both EU & U.K. pleading. A bellwether? 😬 Stay with me. 1/

So first the problem: its a tad complicated but basically goods that are imported into UK and then 'hubbed' onwards into Ireland or other parts of the EU are facing full EU tariffs - this is particularly bad for food stuffs, which attract high tariffs. Why is this? /2
It's a function of the Rules of Origin clauses that mean that goods have to sufficiently "originate" in the UK to qualify for zero-tariff entry to EU (and vice versa).

But to qualify, you have to do something to the goods - process them or add value - not just punt them on /3
The brilliant @AnnaJerzewska does a better job than me of explaining, but the important thing is that this is a nightmare for companies that 'hub' /distribute products through the UK - and that's both EU and UK companies /4
@AnnaJerzewska So both the @Foodanddrinkfed and EU groups like @CAOBISCO_EU (chocs etc) say they want the EU Commission to fix this with a derogation/waiver that takes into account proximity and interdependence of EU/UK supply chains. /5
@AnnaJerzewska @Foodanddrinkfed @CAOBISCO_EU Because as @AnnaJerzewska points out, in a usual FTA (say with Japan or Canada) good don't arrive from the EU customs territory (or vice versa) and then bounce straight back across the border. It's a pretty unique situation. /6
@AnnaJerzewska @Foodanddrinkfed @CAOBISCO_EU It's also tough on Ireland that gets a lot of goods via UK. As Paul Kelly, director of Food Drink Ireland @FoodDrink_Irl the main lobby group for the sector. “Companies are beginning to raise this across the industry." /7
@AnnaJerzewska @Foodanddrinkfed @CAOBISCO_EU @FoodDrink_Irl Now. It is true that goods could "transit" through UK to Ireland/EU - so they aren't imported into UK, they're just 'passing through' - but that, it seems, is not how the system currently works. /8
@AnnaJerzewska @Foodanddrinkfed @CAOBISCO_EU @FoodDrink_Irl According to both @AnnaJerzewska and @SamuelMarcLowe the Commission could - if it wanted - apply a derogation/waiver sorting this out, based on previous precedents. Per Mr Lowe: “If the EU wants to resolve the issue, it could do so pretty easily with an extra clarification." /9
@AnnaJerzewska @Foodanddrinkfed @CAOBISCO_EU @FoodDrink_Irl @SamuelMarcLowe So what did the EU tell my colleague @Sam1Fleming when he asked officials whether this was going to be sorted?

“You can’t expect Brexit not to have consequences. The UK won’t be a distribution hub for the EU any more. EU businesses will need to stop relying on UK hubs.” /10
@AnnaJerzewska @Foodanddrinkfed @CAOBISCO_EU @FoodDrink_Irl @SamuelMarcLowe @Sam1Fleming So to translate from the Bruxellois, that means "touch". Brexit means Brexit mon brave. etc etc.

Not exactly clear how you quantify the impacts of this - am told clothing industry also hugely impacted on this - but the EU position seems pretty stark. /11
@AnnaJerzewska @Foodanddrinkfed @CAOBISCO_EU @FoodDrink_Irl @SamuelMarcLowe @Sam1Fleming We shall see over next year or two whether those who reckoned the barebones deal @DavidGHFrost negotiated is really something to "build on" but this doesn't feel that encouraging! ENDS

More from Peter Foster

Good to see @Marthakearney on @BBCr4today taking @pritipatel to task over the numbers of lorries in Dover - now 1,500 in Stack (M20) and Manston airfield combined - rather more than 170 that @BorisJohnson said yesterday, baffling haulage groups /1

@BBCr4today @pritipatel @BorisJohnson She won't say whether lorry drivers will have to take a PCR test (long-winded, requires RNA extraction etc. 24-48hrs) rather than much faster (and less sensitive) lateral flow test. Short Strait will struggle to operates with PCR tests. You'd need one yesterday for tomorrow! /2

@BBCr4today @pritipatel @BorisJohnson Because of the delays that have empty lorries already stuck in the queues, in an earlier interview British Retail Consortium @the_brc Andrew Opie said fresh food shortages would occur within days because lorries couldn't get back to Spain etc to reload /3

@BBCr4today @pritipatel @BorisJohnson @the_brc Haulage experts like @RHADuncanB are always at pains to explain that the lorries at Dover (and GB-IE, for that matter) are flowing in a continuous cycle. More than 85% are from EU countries. So if you block one side, or artery the whole system starts to grind to a halt/4

@BBCr4today @pritipatel @BorisJohnson @the_brc @RHADuncanB This episode has been a bit of a teaching moment, exposing the canard that the UK can unilaterally "take back control of its borders". It can't. Borders are membranes. Traffic flows in both directions. Actions by one side impact the other - as French move has demonstrated. /5

More from Brexit

You May Also Like

Still wondering about this 🤔


save as q
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇

It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details):
https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha

I've read it so you needn't!

Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.

The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.

Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.


The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.

This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.

The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."

This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.