Immigration is inherently a biological question, whether you like it or not.

Nations are basically large extended families. We know this because you can find out your ethnic background with a DNA test.

Not many people talk about the expected outcome of mass migration.

We're given a lot of platitudes about diversity and inclusion, but what does this really mean in concrete terms?
Should host nations, like the Swedes or French, expect to live in perpetual segregation from imported newcomers?

Or is the expectation that one day they will fully intermix with the newcomers, and differences will disappear?
This raises more questions. If the intention is for differences to eventually disappear, what was the point of diversity, which we are told to value so highly?

At that point, there will be no more diversity. Diversity can only be maintained through segregation.
And if the endpoint is thorough intermixing, that naturally will result in visibly altered nations.

Especially when the native stock portion of a country may scarcely be 30% by century's end, as in the UK.

In other contexts, such outcomes might be labeled genocide.
And this is really the fundamental question I think any nation should ask about immigrants:

Would you be happy if every native child married an immigrant?

Are people happy taking ancient nations and diluting them beyond recognition with twice as many newcomers?
Many people will find such questions offensive or “racist,” but this is the reality of what mass migration entails.

It's easy to be open-minded toward a tiny number of immigrants, but the numbers imply much different outcomes.

More from All

@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the


chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project

starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".

P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!

https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?

You May Also Like

The YouTube algorithm that I helped build in 2011 still recommends the flat earth theory by the *hundreds of millions*. This investigation by @RawStory shows some of the real-life consequences of this badly designed AI.


This spring at SxSW, @SusanWojcicki promised "Wikipedia snippets" on debated videos. But they didn't put them on flat earth videos, and instead @YouTube is promoting merchandising such as "NASA lies - Never Trust a Snake". 2/


A few example of flat earth videos that were promoted by YouTube #today:
https://t.co/TumQiX2tlj 3/

https://t.co/uAORIJ5BYX 4/

https://t.co/yOGZ0pLfHG 5/