Mollyycolllinss Categories For later read
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
So this is a subject that fascinates me for one reason.
Authoritarians (both followers and leaders) tend to see their leaders as god-like figures, and if you cut off the head, the body follows.
This is why they try to find "leftist leaders".
Most of this is drawn from one of my favorite books on the subject, The Authoritarians, by Bob Altemeyer.
You can find it
The thing about authoritarian followers, is that they don't ask why. They don't question. They don't get suspicious. They don't suspect ulterior motives. When someone tells them what they wanna hear, they buy it, hook, line, and sinker... and they assume everyone else does too.
Therefor, they assume others do this too, and they try to poke holes in their opponents arguments. They think that if they catch, say, Hillary Clinton lying, then her "followers" will leave her.
Under the assumption that they aren't already aware she probably is lying at times.
They don't understand how a decentralized movement works, they don't understand how to be properly critical of politicians you vote for, and they see this as one giant political game of King of the Mountain.
Just shove people off and you win.
Authoritarians (both followers and leaders) tend to see their leaders as god-like figures, and if you cut off the head, the body follows.
This is why they try to find "leftist leaders".
This is an important post to read if you're concerned about QAnon. pic.twitter.com/WIpOk1BXRe
— Social Consequences (@hachx0) January 20, 2021
Most of this is drawn from one of my favorite books on the subject, The Authoritarians, by Bob Altemeyer.
You can find it
The thing about authoritarian followers, is that they don't ask why. They don't question. They don't get suspicious. They don't suspect ulterior motives. When someone tells them what they wanna hear, they buy it, hook, line, and sinker... and they assume everyone else does too.
Therefor, they assume others do this too, and they try to poke holes in their opponents arguments. They think that if they catch, say, Hillary Clinton lying, then her "followers" will leave her.
Under the assumption that they aren't already aware she probably is lying at times.
They don't understand how a decentralized movement works, they don't understand how to be properly critical of politicians you vote for, and they see this as one giant political game of King of the Mountain.
Just shove people off and you win.
@heatherpeno I never said I knew more or less than you.
I have asked you for citations to support your assertions and to explain the relevance of some of your assertions, both of which you have demonstrated incapable of doing.
Maybe you are just incapable?
...and @heatherpeno blocks conceding and demonstrating that she cannot support her assertions or explain the relevance of some of her assertions to the original conversation (https://t.co/BzO0Xu2kGG). Her loss.
I have asked you for citations to support your assertions and to explain the relevance of some of your assertions, both of which you have demonstrated incapable of doing.
Maybe you are just incapable?

...and @heatherpeno blocks conceding and demonstrating that she cannot support her assertions or explain the relevance of some of her assertions to the original conversation (https://t.co/BzO0Xu2kGG). Her loss.

Paternal legal surrender is not yet a thing in any jurisdiction I am aware of but the female equivalents are legal (though not all of them are legal everywhere): abortion, baby Moses laws, unilateral adoption, etc.
— Michael Stretton, III, Rosa Ferreum (\u9435\u7470) (@MSS3RosaFerreum) February 3, 2020
Do you have a citation to the contrary?
Important tweet from @jaketapper. One amendment: mainstream media will try to change the subject too. It's not a new criticism, the deferential spirit among the political press corps has been noted since Didion wrote about it in the 1990s.
"Those who talk to Mr. Woodward, in other words, can be confident that he will be civil (âI too was growing tired, and it seemed time to stand up and thank himâ), that he will not feel impelled to make connections between..." 1/
"what he is told and what is already known that he will treat even the most patently self-serving account as if untainted by hindsight..." 2/
"In this business of running the story, in fact in the business of news itself, certain conventions are seen as beyond debate. âOpinionâ will be so labeled, and confined to the op-ed page or the Sunday-morning shows." 3/
"'News analysis' will be so labeled, and will appear in a subordinate position to the 'news' story it accompanies. In the rest of the paper as on the evening news, the story will be reported â'impartially,' the story will be 'even-handed,' the story will be 'fair.'â 4/
We\u2019re beginning to see what will likely be a Herculean effort by MAGA media and certain pols to change the subject from their grotesque assault on democracy, one that resulted in bloodshed and the death of a police officer. Be aware of what they\u2019re doing as they try.
— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) January 10, 2021
"Those who talk to Mr. Woodward, in other words, can be confident that he will be civil (âI too was growing tired, and it seemed time to stand up and thank himâ), that he will not feel impelled to make connections between..." 1/
"what he is told and what is already known that he will treat even the most patently self-serving account as if untainted by hindsight..." 2/
"In this business of running the story, in fact in the business of news itself, certain conventions are seen as beyond debate. âOpinionâ will be so labeled, and confined to the op-ed page or the Sunday-morning shows." 3/
"'News analysis' will be so labeled, and will appear in a subordinate position to the 'news' story it accompanies. In the rest of the paper as on the evening news, the story will be reported â'impartially,' the story will be 'even-handed,' the story will be 'fair.'â 4/