1/9

Comment: good morning world. Just thinking as typing here. It's not a habit starting doing this, yet bear with me please. It can happen.
To me, this isn't issue of right or left (to extremes) per se. Yet, is there a failing?
I think so.
Sat, thinking...it occurred-->

2/9

that i am looking to find solutions. And following, that I am and think alone. (Its the way it is here.) So, not being in a constant or really, anytime chat to talk of. I wonder ... as i am here-and-now, what can be done?

We're in it, aren't we!
Indeed we are.
Viewing -->
3/9

this and that somewhat more than reading. I get a picture of say, excited distress in many. Okay, not all? But meaning here, it doesn't take to act to be the way i may have you envisage it. Not violently. I just think of a state to this. But, who does it encompass?

Well-->
4/9

if I'm on the right line to thinking. Then this is a true and utter MF. Not just contemporary from what I glean. Though exceptional today.
If we, those who are concerned to resolve peacefully. If we don't get a grip. I think it's then Nature makes humanity walk the plank.-->
5/9

It won't matter where or who one is. I think this is clear.

Anyhow, we're also clever in the main. Categorizing individuals, groupings and all that. It won't cut the mustard now. But i see differences, i do.
Now and again, more and more frequently, it occurs that -->
6/9

the call for the outreach and grouping of the peaceful or even "decent" people is subsumed. And subsumed in yes, chatter of excited distress amongst even the very ones they all are. No matter how outwardly calm, how knowledgable, how basically functional and/or level -->
7/9

headed or not. Subsumed is what i suggest. And we know, like it or not, that not getting it together to mindfully solve this. Is to be carried off by our ineptitude in the face of even peaceful issue. Or, by the Planet's situation we're not then handling well enough.-->
8/9

Like it or not, stewardship is the (unfortuante) ask of Nature upon us. I think?!
For each and all, any playtime is over on this planet. And as this means shepherding the violent (each and every generation to follow also), then the peaceful best get a grip. And find a way.
9/9

I can't think more here. I'd ramble to be honest.
I do know conflict isn't in this to be me. That's my baseline. I'll argue, blah blah. Yet I'll walk away too. So, who are the violent who would harm nevertheless? What's the argument? What's their beef?

It's this to deal to
End/

I'm so sorry if you read this far. And haven't been satisfied by content. A suggestion is to coalesce somehow.

Somehow we must sustain and improve in peace. Sheperd the violent away from such acts, and steward this entire planet.

https://t.co/dM2vIktetq

More from For later read

The common understanding of propaganda is that it is intended to brainwash the masses. Supposedly, people get exposed to the same message repeatedly and over time come to believe in whatever nonsense authoritarians want them to believe /1

And yet authoritarians often broadcast silly, unpersuasive propaganda.

Political scientist Haifeng Huang writes that the purpose of propaganda is not to brainwash people, but to instill fear in them /2


When people are bombarded with propaganda everywhere they look, they are reminded of the strength of the regime.

The vast amount of resources authoritarians spend to display their message in every corner of the public square is a costly demonstration of their power /3

In fact, the overt silliness of authoritarian propaganda is part of the point. Propaganda is designed to be silly so that people can instantly recognize it when they see it


Propaganda is intended to instill fear in people, not brainwash them.

The message is: You might not believe in pro-regime values or attitudes. But we will make sure you are too frightened to do anything about it.

You May Also Like